FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

EFTA00108882 Dataset 9 6 pages Download original PDF Download as text
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Title: (U//FOUO) EC REQUESTING PALM SPRINGS RA TO Date: 11/17/2010 INTERVIEW Approved By: Drafted By: Case ID #: -2-MM-113327 (U) SEE SUB Details: Precedence: ROUTINE Date: 11/18/2010 To: Los Angeles Attn: Riverside RA Palm Springs RA From: Miami PB-2/PBCRA Contact: Approved By: Drafted By: Case ID #: 72-MM-113327 (Pending) Title: OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE Synopsis: EC requesting Palm Springs RA to interview MICHAEL D. EFTA00108882 Title: (U//FOUO) EC REQUESTING PALM SPRINGS RA TO INTERVIEW MICHAEL D. Re: 72-MM-113327, 11/17/2010 Details: In October 2009, Miami Division opened an obstruction of justice case against was the previous house manager and butler to Palm Beach County resident JEFFREY EPSTEIN. EPSTEIN was the subject of a child prostitution, 31E matter, worked by Miami Division beginning in 2006. Investigation of EPSTEIN revealed that he brought underage girls to his home to perform massages and paid them to engage in sex acts with himself and one another. The U.S. Attorney's Office entered into a non-prosecution agreement with EPSTEIN where EPSTEIN pled guilty tO state offenses in Florida state court. EPSTEIN was sentenced to a period of state prison followed by community supervision as a registered sex offender. EPSTEIN completed his community supervision in July 2010. EPSTEIN's victims filed suit against EPSTEIN in state and federal court seeking damages in civil litigation. During the discovery process, RODRIGUEZ was deposed by attorney BRADLEY EDWARDS who represented several of the victims. After his deposition, RODRIGUEZ contacted EDWARDS and advised that he had lists of additional victims that he had not previously disclosed to law 2 EFTA00108883 Title: (U//FOLIO) EC REQUESTING PALM SPRINGS RA TO INTERVIEW MICHAEL D. Re: 72-MM-113327, 11/17/2010 enforcement during the criminal investigation or after being served with a subpoena in the civil case. RODRIGUEZ advised he would not turn the information over to the attorney but instead wanted monetary compensation. In November 2009, RODRIGUEZ attempted to sell the information to a LICE for $50,000.00, which resulted in the above captioned case. Information was recently provided to FBI Miami that MICHAEL and previously worked for EPSTEIN as housekeepers or property managers at one of his properties and may have witnessed EPSTEIN's interaction with underage girls and criminal conduct. It is unclear at which property MICHAEL and worked. EPSTEIN maintained homes and residences in New York, New York, Palm Beach, Florida, the U.S. Virgin Islands, New Mexico, London, England, and Paris, France. It is requested that Los Angeles Division interview MICHAEL and regarding their employment with EPSTEIN and any interactions they observed between EPSTEIN and underage girls. Reference Name - 3 EFTA00108884 Title: (U//FOLIO) EC REQUESTING PALM SPRINGS RA TO INTERVIEW MICHAEL D. Re: 72-MM-113327, 11/17/2010 Last: FRIEDMAN First: MICHAEL Middle: D Race: U Sex: M DOB: SOC: Addressfes) - House #: Street Name: City: State: California Postal Code: 92253 Country: USA Phone #: Phone #: Phone #: Phone #: Reference Name - 4 EFTA00108885 Title: (U//FOUO) EC REQUESTING PALM SPRINGS RA TO INTERVIEW MICHAEL D. Re: 72-MM-113327, 11/17/2010 Race: U Sex: F DOB: SOC: Addressfes) - House #: Street Name: City: State: California Postal Code: 92253 Country: USA LEAD(s) : Set Lead 1: (Action) LOS ANGELES AT PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA It is requested Palm Springs RA interview MICHAEL and * * 5 EFTA00108886 Title: (U//FOUO) EC REQUESTING PALM SPRINGS RA TO INTERVIEW MICHAEL D. Re: 72-MM-113327, 11/17/2010 .• 6 EFTA00108887

📷 Images in this document (6 detected)

AI-generated factual descriptions of embedded images (llava:13b). These are searchable across the corpus.

[Image 1] The image is a document scan, specifically a court document. It contains text that appears to be a legal document, possibly a transcript or a court order. The visible text includes a title, a case number, a date, and a reference to a specific case. There are also names of individuals, which are likely parties to the case, and a description of the case details. The document is structured with headi [Image 2] The image is a document scan, specifically a letter. It contains text that appears to be a formal communication, possibly related to legal or official matters. The visible text includes a date, a reference number, and a recipient's name. There are also sections with headings such as "Case Number," "Plaintiff," "Defendant," and "Court." The document includes paragraphs with text that discuss legal [Image 3] The image shows a document with the title "FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION" at the top. The document appears to be a form or report with various fields filled out, including a date, a case number, and a location. The fields are mostly blank, with the exception of the date, which is redacted. The form includes sections for "Case Number," "Date," "Location," "Victim," "Suspect," and "Description of [Image 4] The image shows a document with text, which appears to be a letter or a report. The document is titled "REPORT OF INVESTIGATION" and includes a date and a reference number. The text is partially obscured, but it mentions a "SENIOR STAFF MEMBER" and includes a list of names, titles, and locations, such as "CALIFORNIA," "SACRAMENTO," and "SAN FRANCISCO." There are also sections titled "SUMMARY," "FI [Image 5] The image shows a document with text, which appears to be a list or a table with various entries. The text is too small to read clearly, but it seems to be a structured document with headings and possibly a list of names or items with corresponding details. The document is not a photograph, but rather a scan or a digital representation of a written or printed document. There are no visible names, [Image 6] The image appears to be a document scan, specifically a page from a legal or official document. The text is too small to read clearly, but it seems to be a formal document with a header and footer, which is typical for legal or official correspondence. There are no visible names, dates, places, or logos that can be discerned from this image. The document is presented in portrait orientation.