The Board Room
The Board Room
guide to hacking
Vincenzo lozzo
EFTA01071708
"GET YOUR FACTS FIRST, THEN
DISTORT THEM AS IOU PIE
MARK TWAIN
Lifehack Quotes
EFTA01071709
Are you compromised?
Yes
EFTA01071710
Why is everyone
compromised?
1 Your network is a replicable monoculture
2. Compromising is a one-way street: You can't "un-
compromise" something
3. The internet and your network are a graph of trust:
compromising is viral and exponential
4. Your defense is reactive and slow, it must be
proactive and fast
EFTA01071711
I' k
ly r bf.
•
Or • t et , . •
' rs.„r
• Re • IA: •
r)xt;•, •
:Jr444104 4
".,t4 • 6
EFTA01071712
Monoculture
• The attacker can download the same software you
have and attack it until he finds a way in.
• An attacker can replicate an almost-exact copy of
your machine and go at it until he finds an "in"
• Once the attacker is on a machine he can
experiment and explore the trusted neighbors until
he finds an "in"
EFTA01071713
EFTA01071714
"Un-compromise"-able
• A maxim: there's always a deep enough level in a
machine that is not defended/defendable
• It used to be the kernel, now it's the bios, the
firmware, the hardware, the secret co-processor,
you name it
• You can't "un-compromise" because it's impossible
to know what's compromised
EFTA01071715
EFTA01071716
Graphs of trust
• A lot of security today happens at the "perimeter",
once you're in it's game over. This is called "lateral
movement"
• Implicit trust: we trust somebody else servers to
download executables, we trust certificate
authorities keys, we trust our partner servers
• This means that your threat model is in large part
outside of your control
EFTA01071717
EFTA01071718
Reactive and slow
• Most security tools today work by identifying an
attack somewhere else and then try to protect
everyone else
• This is reactive in nature and ineffective: most
attacks stay latent for a very long time
• Even with almost-real time detection, the attacker
needs to beat you at the race just once
EFTA01071719
EFTA01071720
The recursive guide to
compromise anything
1. Compromise a machine (exploit, social
engineering, backdoor, physical access)
2. The maxim: there's always a deep enough level in
a machine that is not defended/defendable. Go
there and stay put
3. For every node in the graph that trusts your
machine, go to 1 and be fast
EFTA01071721
Digital immune system
EFTA01071722
Digital immune system
• We have the technology to build 80% of the digital
immune system
• We need network effects and board-level decisions
to make the remaining 20% true
• This will not solve computer security but it will leap
it ahead by a lot
EFTA01071723
EFTA01071724
"Shape-shifting" software
• No two copies of the same app, (kernel, firmware,
etc etc) should behave the same way at the micro
level
• Code should adapt to its users/owners, detect and
log anomalous behavior on a distributed ledger
EFTA01071725
"Accountability
breeds response-
ability."
-Stephen Covey
QuoteAddicts
EFTA01071726
Code Signing
• Every piece of code that is executed on a machine
should be signed by a trusted entity
• We can't trust a single company/machine: create a
distributed ledger of valid signatures for every
piece of code
EFTA01071727
EFTA01071728
Self-destructing machines
• Every machine should have a "known-good" state
to revert to
• Every time a machine is thought to be
compromised it should be destroyed immediately
and reverted back to the "known-good" state
EFTA01071729
EFTA01071730
Adaptive network structure
• The trusting neighbors of a machine must be able
to shut down communication with the allegedly
compromised machine
• The trusting neighbors should be able to adapt
their network topology to use a mirror copy of the
compromised machine
EFTA01071731
4
EFTA01071732
The Al future
• In the future a lot of offensive security will be Al/ML-
driven
• In the future security will be much faster and much
more complicated
• We can't have proper defense against that without
these building blocks
EFTA01071733
CAA
EFTA01071734
📷 Images in this document (27 detected; 6 largest described)
AI-generated factual descriptions of embedded images (llava:13b). These are searchable across the corpus.
[Image 1] The image shows a text-based message with a motivational quote. The quote reads, "Look in the mirror that's your competition." The text is presented in a bold, capitalized font with a distressed texture overlay, giving it a grunge or worn appearance. The background is a solid color, which appears to be a dark grey or black. The style of the image is reminiscent of a motivational poster or a graphi
[Image 2] The image is a photograph of a person with a stylized appearance. The individual has a prominent facial structure with a blend of human and non-human features, including pointed ears, a slender nose, and a textured skin pattern. The person's eyes are yellow and have a glowing effect. The individual is wearing a costume that resembles a character from a science fiction or fantasy genre, with a pred
[Image 3] The image shows a network of computer monitors arranged in a circular pattern, each with a blue glowing outline representing a person. The monitors are connected by blue lines, suggesting a network or a collaborative system. The image is likely a digital artwork or a conceptual representation of a network or teamwork. There are no visible texts, logos, or other identifiable features that would pro
[Image 4] The image shows a sign with the text "NO EXIT" prominently displayed. The sign is designed to look like a brick wall with a green arch at the top and a white border. The text is in bold, capital letters, and the sign is likely intended to indicate that there is no exit in that direction. The style of the image is a straightforward photograph, capturing the sign in its entirety.
[Image 5] The image shows a single snail on a green leaf. The snail has a spiral shell and is moving along the edge of the leaf. The background is out of focus, but it appears to be a natural setting with greenery. The image is a photograph, and there are no visible texts or logos.
[Image 6] The image shows a close-up of a person's face, likely a photograph. The individual appears to be wearing a headpiece with electronic components and has a serious expression. The background is out of focus, but it seems to be an industrial or technological setting. There are no visible texts or logos that provide additional context.