Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 355 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/20/2016 Page 1 of 3
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 355 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/20/2016 Page 1 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHRN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA
JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2,
Petitioners,
vs.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent.
RESPONDENT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER
Respondent, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Unopposed Motion to
Amend Scheduling Order, and states:
I. On December 23, 2015, the Court entered its Scheduling Order, setting forth dates on
which the parties are to file their respective motions for summary judgment; responses thereto;
and replies. D.E. 346. This Order was based upon the parties Joint Scheduling Report, filed on
December 17, 2015. D.E. 345.
2. When the Joint Scheduling Report was filed, respondent expected it would be able to
respond to petitioners' Third Request for Admissions to the Government Regarding Questions
Relevant to "Victim" Status under the Crime Victim Rights Act, and petitioners' Supplemental
Request for Production to The Government Regarding "Victim" Status, by January 19, 2016.
This would have allowed petitioners to have the responses prior to January 22, 2016, the date
they were to file their motion for summary judgment. D.E. 346,1 1.
3. Due to the absence of one of respondent's co-counsel during the period January 14 —
24, 2016, respondent's counsel were unable to prepare the responses to the two discovery
EFTA01130791
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 355 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/20/2016 Page 2 of 3
requests by January 19, 2016. Respondent asked petitioner's counsel for an extension until
February 1, 2016, to which they graciously consented. Since petitioners will not have the
responses prior to the filing of their motion for summary judgment, the parties have agreed to
seek leave of the Court to amend the briefing schedule to the following:
February 10, 2016
March 24, 2016
April 12, 2016
April 26, 2016 Petitioners shall file their motion for summary judgment
(presently due on January 22, 2016)
Government shall file its response to petitioners' motion for summary
judgment, and its own cross-motion for summary judgment
(presently due on February 22, 2016)
Petitioners shall file their reply to the Government's response to
petitioners' motion for summary judgment, and their response to the
Government's cross-motion for summary judgment
(presently due on March 11, 2016)
Government shall file its reply to petitioners' response to the
Government's cross-motion for summary judgment
(presently due on March 25, 2016)
4. Respondent respectfully requests the Scheduling Order be amended to reflect the
adjusted dates in the preceding paragraph. A proposed Order is attached.
DATED: January 20, 2016 Respectfully submitted,
By: WIFREDO A. FERRER
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
s/ Dexter A. Lee
DEXTER A. LEE
Assistant U.S. Attorney
Fla. Bar No. 0936693
99 N.E. 4th Street, Suite 300
Miami, Florida 33132
ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT
EFTA01130792
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 355 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/20/2016 Page 3 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on January 20, 2016, I electronically filed the foregoing
document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF.
s/ Dexter A. Lee
DEXTER A. LEE
Assistant U.S. Attorney
SERVICE LIST
Jane Does 1 and 2 v. United States,
Case No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON
United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
Bradley J. Edwards, Esq.,
Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.
425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301
Paul G. Cassell
S.J. Quinney College of Law at the
University of Utah
332 S. 1400 E.
Salt Lake City, Utah 84112
Attorneys for Jane Doe # I and Jane Doe # 2
3
EFTA01130793
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 355-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/20/2016 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA
JANE DOE I AND JANE DOE 2,
Petitioners.
vs.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent.
ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER
This matter is before the Court upon respondent's Unopposed Motion to Amend
Scheduling Order. It is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED;
1. Petitioners shall file their motion for summary judgment addressing whether a
violation of the CVRA occurred by February 10, 2016.
2. The Government shall file its response to Petitioners' motion for summary judgment,
and its own cross-motion for summary judgment, by March 24, 2016.
3. Petitioners shall file their reply to the Government's response to Petitioners' motion
for summary judgment, and their response to the Government's cross-motion for summary
judgment, by April 12, 2016.
4. The Government shall file its reply to Petitioners' response to the Government's
cross-motion for summary judgment by April 26, 2016.
5. In the event the Court finds that a disputed issue of fact precludes the granting of
EFTA01130794
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 355-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/20/2016 Page 2 of 2
summary judgment, the Court will schedule an evidentiary hearing at a later date.
DONE AND ORDERED in chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County,
Florida, this day of January, 2016.
KENNETH A. MARRA
United States District Judge
2
EFTA01130795
📷 Images in this document (5 detected)
AI-generated factual descriptions of embedded images (llava:13b). These are searchable across the corpus.
[Image 1] The image shows a document with text, which appears to be a legal or official notice. The document is titled "NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO DISMISS" and is dated "January 13, 2021." It is addressed to "Defendant" and is signed by "DANIEL R. BECKER, ESQ." The document mentions a case number and includes a section titled "WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court enter an order gran
[Image 2] The image shows a document that appears to be a court filing or legal document. It includes sections such as "Case No." and "Plaintiff," indicating that it is related to a legal proceeding. There are paragraphs with headings such as "Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment" and "Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment." The document contains text that is typical of legal do
[Image 3] The image is a document scan, specifically a court document. It appears to be a page from a legal case file. The document is titled "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA" and includes a case number and a page number. There are sections for the names of the parties involved, the names of the attorneys, and the date of the document. The document also includes a section titled "O
[Image 4] The image shows a document, which appears to be a legal or official letter. The document is titled "NOTICE OF LITIGATION" and is addressed to "Defendant." It is dated "January 20, 2021" and is from "Plaintiff." The document mentions a case number and includes a paragraph that seems to be a statement of the case. The visible text includes the names "Plaintiff" and "Defendant," but the names are red
[Image 5] The image appears to be a digital document, possibly a court filing or a legal notice. It contains text and a header that includes a case number, a date, and a reference to a specific court. The document is titled "NOTICE OF FILING OF PLEADINGS" and includes a list of parties involved in the case. There are also sections for the date of filing and the signature of the person who filed the pleading