From: Erik Viirre <

From: Erik Viirre < Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 2:29 PM To: jeffrey E. Subject: Research Plan Extramission Research Plan 6_15_2017 Erik =iirre M.D. Ph.D. What Evidence will be Necessary to Show EM??? Summary The photon emission phenomena of the eye may range from the low-level spontaneous visible wavelength =hotons that have already been demonstrated by Viirre and Furness, to rapid =urst, near-invisible photon streams that are only activated when precise =lignment occurs between the preferred eyes of two naturally "coupled"=people. The Extramission research program will be a systematic procedure to look for =he most likely coded photon features based on the theoretic utility of the phenomenon to humans. The process will be controlled experiments to =etect and verify any systematic coded features discovered. An advanced photonics =aboratory with various photo detectors, stimulus control paradigms, specially =onfigured laboratory space and administrative controls and procedures are =ecessary for this program. Of note, the encoding may be purely in the quantum =ntanglement states of those photons and a search process for such is planned. The=study program will be feature searches for two different EM paradigms: one for broadcast signals from individuals and the other for signals between two adult people with interpersonal connections with high data transfer rates. A systematic =earch process will be used for discovery and then controlled experiment =rocedures within and across subjects will be used to verify the presence of =iscovered codes. Other feature searches can be considered. Below are listed the various photon light stream features that should be considered, the two year study =rogram outline and the program budget for one and two years. The first year =ill be conventional photonics experiments followed by a project review and the =econd year will be validation studies of the first year and also examine =uantum state entangled photons as stimuli. Also in the second year will be investigations of mother/child pairs. Light Stream Features to Examine: 1. Light Timing =nbsp; -Continuous, uncoded/coded =nbsp; -Intermittent uncoded/coded, regular/irregular, timed/random EFTA_R1_01431915 EFTA02398141 -Stimulus Triggered =ncoded/coded, meaningful/random, regular/random, instantaneous/delayed 2. =ight Features - Wavelength(s), single, narrow band, broadband, multiple, polarization? = Visible/non-visible &=bsp; Endogenous Photon Generation: Back prop Photoreceptors = =nbsp; =xternal Catalytics with controls: Autofluoresence. - wavelengths that are likely to be received: photoreceptor or two photon. =nbsp; - on/off axis 3. Stimuli and =ontrols =nbsp; -Dark =nbsp; &n=sp; Continuous =nbsp; &n=sp; Recorded Eye =nbsp; &n=sp; &nbs=; Shuttered =nbsp; &n=sp; &nbs=; Hooded -Light Stimuli =nbsp; &n=sp; Ganzfield =nbsp; &n=sp; &nbs=; White =nbsp; &n=sp; &nbs=; Monochromatic =nbsp; &n=sp; &nbs=; Just Detectable, Moon, Room, Daylight =nbsp; &n=sp; Spot =nbsp; &n=sp; &nbs=; Laser =nbsp; &n=sp; &nbs=; Fovea =nbsp; &n=sp; Images =nbsp; &n=sp; &nbs=; Static =nbsp; &n=sp; &nbs=; Dynamic 2 EFTA_R1_01431916 EFTA02398142 =nbsp; &n=sp; &nbs=; =nbsp; Smooth =nbsp; &n=sp; &nbs=; =nbsp; Saccadic =nbsp; &n=sp; &nbs=; =nbsp; Voluntary/Directed =nbsp; &n=sp; Individuals =nbsp; &n=sp; &nbs=; People =nbsp; &n=sp; &nbs=; Partners =nbsp; &n=sp; &nbs=; Mother Child =nbsp; &n=sp; Non Visual =nbsp; &n=sp; &nbs=; Auditory =nbsp; &n=sp; &nbs=; Mental Continuous, Trigger: Visualization -Stimulus Triggers: =nbsp;uncoded/coded, meaningful/random, regular/random, instantaneous/delayed 4.) Eye =nbsp; -Monocular: continuous =nbsp; &n=sp; same eye/fellow eye binocular - Closed Eye o Through Lid o Eye forced open o Experimental CL 5.) Code =nbsp; -Continuous =nbsp; -Pulse: Regular/Irregular -Stimulus Triggered: uncoded/coded, meaningful/random, regular/random, instantaneous/delayed - entangled 3 EFTA_R1_01431917 EFTA02398143 Laboratory=Requirements Sensor: =nbsp; -Low Light: PMT, Avalanche Photodiodes, -Camera, Visible, IR, UV, =Hz? =nbsp; &n=sp; Unobstructed path/filters - Hood for Darkness in recorded eye, light stimulus through shutter, or fellow eye. - Divided path: stimulate and record same eye - Possible Binocular Recording Stimuli =nbsp; Same/fellow eye mono/binocular =nbsp; Control =nbsp; &n=sp; Timing: delay minimize (shutter/piezo/optical resonance element) &nb=p; Entangled Photon stimuli with verification of receipt of entanglement. Eye Activity =nbsp; Blinks =nbsp; EOMs: gaze patterns: gaze contingent tasks Brain Activity =nbsp; Attention/Alpha =nbsp; VEP Data Acquisition =nbsp; Continuous Recording with Epoch Marking 4 EFTA_R1_01431918 EFTA02398144 =nbsp; &n=sp; Audio, trigger with control =nbsp; &n=sp; Blink EOM record =nbsp; &n=sp; EEG signals Analysis =nbsp; Data Recording and Analytic Algorithms. =nbsp; Laboratory =pace Set-up: Light Control =hamber =nbsp; Subject =nbsp; Stimulus =nbsp; Experiment video recording: on axis, off axis =nbsp; lighting controls =nbsp; Air quality for test subjects Control Room =nbsp; Intercom =nbsp; Lights Procedure Prediction =riven Systematic Search: Discovery via Controlled Experiments The challenge to executing this program will be to efficiently search the available feature space with a process that will be most likely to detect any coded features. Unlimited =ime and universal fine-resolution examination of all possible parameters is =ot possible. Thus review, by a group of knowledgeable experts, of likely =eatures would be done. Clever use of broad wavelength detection photonics will =ead to a search pattern that has the best chance to rapidly detect photons and =hen coded signals within the photon stream. Once any coded features are =abeled, then repeated tests within and across individuals will be used to verify =he identification. 5 EFTA_R1_01431919 EFTA02398145 "I'm Here" Broadcast vs. Inter-personal Data Transfer Two likely coding =aradigms are a broadcast signal that has rudimentary signal content, such as "I =80 m Here" vs. a detailed data transfer stream that occurs during concentrated direct interpersonal interaction between two people. The broadcast EM =aradigm would incorporate broadcast features: wide angular spread, low signal content, =ut high reliability, continuous and repeated signals. It would occur in circumstances where other signals might be reduced: low light and quiet =udio. It would likely use endogenous photon generation especially as ambient =ight may be low or indirect, but two photon cascades might be used. Higher energy photons would be more likely to serve as signal carriers and thus should =e part of the spectrum tested for. Thus to detect the =roadcast paradigm, continuous recording in the visible wavelengths would be =traightforward and feasible. Highly sensitive photomultiplier tubes and avalanche =hotodiodes would be able to detect small numbers of photons, and the system would =e configured for continuous presentation of the photon detection in a =ontrol room display. Ambient conditions would be darkness, low light and visual stimuli such as shadows of people. Monocular recording would be done =ith a hooded recording eye and an un-occluded receiving eye. Rudimentary codes =ould be looked for by visual inspection and simple code detection algorithms =hat detect repeated patterns. The data transfer paradigm, which would be revolutionary science if discovered, will take a dedicated =roject to detect. The paradigm is two individuals who can gaze directly into each =ther's eyes. In a "co-equal" partnership, transfer would be =xpected to be two ways, so one way detection would suffice. A key item would be the passage of =hotons from one transmitting eye and where that eye is aligned. Eye =E2 preference" would most likely determine both the transmitting eye and receiving eye. =iming of the Extramission would depend on the gaze being "locked in"=to the receiving eye, blinks, microsaccade intrusions and then signals for stimulus. The =erson with the receiving eye would be the stimulator: what would they signal? Continuous recording for bursts of photons would be used. Endogenous =hoton generation would be the most likely photon generator, but broad-spectrum detectors would be used to improve detection rates. Recording of all =ctivity features of emitter, receiver, photons, eye activities, stimuli would be seeded to ensure successful detection. Extramission Study Budget 1 year 2 years Year One Year Two (Thousands) Personnel (burdened) PI: Erik Viirre =49%) 6 EFTA_R1_01431920 EFTA02398146 150 150 Optical Engineer =: 175 175 Data Equipment =ngineer 1: 150 150 Analyst 1: 150 150 Technician 100 100 Administrator 100 100 Consultants (TAF + QM =r 2) 100 200 Code Breaker 50 7 EFTA_R1_01431921 EFTA02398147 100 Equipment PMT 20 Avalanche =hotodiode 20 Computer Controls 50 Eyetracking 100 Optics 50 Light hoods etc. 25 Entanglement Infrastructure Lab (10X10) Control Room =10X5) Meeting Room =10X20) 250 8 EFTA_R1_01431922 EFTA02398148 Admin/reception (10 X =0) Total 1000 sq =t 25 25 Admin Costs (IRB =tc) 5 5 Travel SO 75 Total 1055 1230 Plus Overhead =15%) 1213.25 1414.5 Total Equipment 265 250 Total recurring + equipment 9 EFTA_R1_01431923 EFTA02398149 1478.25 1664.5 Erik Viirre M.D. Ph.D UCSD Departments of Neurosciences, Surgery and =ognitive Sciences Arthur C Clarke Center for Human =magination Taubman Endowment for Neurotechnology XPRIZE Foundation Office: Rm =121, UCSD Atkinson Hall = 10 EFTA_R1_01431924 EFTA02398150