Nature Positive Role of the Mining and Metals Sector

Page 63 of 73 · WEF_Nature_Positive_Role_of_the_Mining_and_Metals_Sector.pdf

75. International Resource Panel. (2024). Intentionally designing sustainable consumption and production policies and practices to reduce inequalities. https://www.resourcepanel.org/reports/intentionally-designing-SCP . 76. Circle Economy Foundation. (2024). The Circularity Gap Report 2024. https://www.circularity-gap.world/2024. 77. International Resource Panel. (2024). Intentionally designing sustainable consumption and production policies and practices to reduce inequalities. https://www.resourcepanel.org/reports/intentionally-designing-SCP . 78. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). (2024). Global Resources Outlook 2024. https://www.unep.org/resources/Global-Resource-Outlook-2024. 79. Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures (TNFD). (2024). Additional sector guidance – Metals and mining. https://tnfd.global/publication/additional-sector-guidance-metals-and-mining/. 80. Science Based Targets Network (SBTN). (n.d.). Step 1: Assess. https://sciencebasedtargetsnetwork.org/companies/take-action/assess/ . 81. Science Based Targets Network (SBTN). (n.d.). Step 2: Prioritize. https://sciencebasedtargetsnetwork.org/companies/take-action/prioritize/. 82. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2023). Handbook on Environmental Due Diligence in Mineral Supply Chains. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/finance-and-investment/handbook-on-environmental-due-diligence- in-mineral-supply-chains_cef843bf-en; Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2016). Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/governance/oecd-due-diligence-guidance-for-responsible-supply-chains-of-minerals-from- conflict-affected-and-high-risk-areas_9789264252479-en. 83. International Finance Corporation (IFC). (2012). Performance Standard 6: Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Management of Living Natural Resources. https://www.ifc.org/en/insights-reports/2012/ifc-performance-standard-6. 84. International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). (2023). Measuring Nature-Positive: Setting and implementing verified, robust targets for species and ecosystems. https://iucn.org/sites/default/files/2023-11/iucn-nature-positive- contribution-v1.0.pdf. 85. Science Based Targets Network (SBTN). (n.d.). Step 3: Measure, Set & Disclose Freshwater Targets. https://sciencebasedtargetsnetwork.org/companies/take-action/set-targets/freshwater-targets/; Science Based Targets Network (SBTN). (n.d.). Step 3: Measure, Set & Disclose Land Targets. https://sciencebasedtargetsnetwork.org/ companies/take-action/set-targets/land-targets/; Science Based Targets Network (SBTN). (n.d.). Step 3: Biodiversity within SBTs for Nature. https://sciencebasedtargetsnetwork.org/companies/take-action/set-targets/biodiversity-targets/. 86. World Economic Forum. (n.d.). Sector Transitions to Nature Positive website. https://initiatives.weforum.org/sector- transitions-to-nature-positive/home. 87. Business for Nature. (n.d.). Sector Actions Towards a Nature-Positive Future. https://www.businessfornature.org/sector-actions. 88. Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance (IRMA). (n.d.). Resources: Full documentation and guidance. https://responsiblemining.net/resources/#full-documentation-and-guidance. 89. The Copper Mark. (n.d.). Core Documents. https://coppermark.org/standards/core-documents/. 90. Aluminium Stewardship Initiative (ASI). (n.d.). ASI Performance Standard. https://aluminium-stewardship.org/asi-standards/performance-standard. 91. International Finance Corporation (IFC). (2012). Performance Standard 6: Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Management of Living Natural Resources. https://www.ifc.org/en/insights-reports/2012/ifc-performance-standard-6. 92. Cross-Sector Biodiversity Initiative (CSBI). (2015). Cross-sector Guide for Implementing the Mitigation Hierarchy. http://www.csbi.org.uk/our-work/mitigation-hierarchy-guide/. 93. The Nature Conservancy (TNC). (2015). Achieving Conservation and Development: 10 Principles for Applying the Mitigation Hierarchy. https://www.conservationgateway.org/Documents/TNCApplyingTheMitigationHierarchy.pdf. 94. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). (2012). Biodiversity offsets: voluntary and compliance regimes. https://files.ctctcdn.com/b3b328ed001/7b1aaa64-234c-4918-abb8-27a30c51ac03.pdf. 95. Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures (TNFD). (2024). Recommendations of the Taskforce on Nature-Related Financial Disclosures. https://tnfd.global/publication/recommendations-of-the-taskforce-on-nature-related-financial- disclosures/#publication-content. 96. International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB). (2023). IFRS S1 and IFRS S2. https://www.ifrs.org/issued-standards/ifrs-sustainability-standards-navigator/. 97. CDP . (n.d.). Guidance for companies. https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-companies. 98. Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). (2024). Sector Standard for Mining. https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/standards-development/sector-standard-for-mining/. 99. Includes high and very high materiality dependencies from ENCORE across the value chain – the full methodology for this assessment can be found in the Appendix: United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC). (2024). Exploring Natural Capital Opportunities, Risks and Exposure. https://encorenature.org/en. Nature Positive: Role of the Mining and Metals Sector 63
Ask AI what this page says about a topic: