Document text
A.-
_¢-1';
gr-1~r .,_ U5. k T ._-. - .,f u-J T. '_~_"i-_-:1 . .4 - .7-J-.-»- -~.-. +.¢@;¥*192.§1.-.:§¢-».*».-:-==- ~**-1-4 ..,~~:..= =-an £11;=-*=- r ~ .1 " -- rzw ..| . ' . ,,_ 3: II ,' ',, .8 5- J '~ |
.
1 .v- _._.. ,_,. - '-; .'.*:"./""~l.."."~-r=Y L
/_ W, ,7.
.*<.1-.:=-. , - . -1 -_7_ -. 4:. .
-1,: "".I G
"@2:..1.1.- cs ~ ~..92=**~ >35 _._,__ an1' W 9 5 W53BAFBEME Clh -A,-.92
- ' ' ' - '.- 92"1 *£$Iui;_,t=.-. ...=_;¢ _.....4.:..~.-A..;.; ~--1 ,,;_ ..., Q ,1. -ehu.a..»:i...: m~ -1*-l'"-"_ __!
,,- .. .-...- ---'._ '
v._,. ¢.__ ._r 92 ~ 3 ' .» ._ _,- _ .,92 ,h "- .0 .". , ..." ._ _-af.' . 1- 2- #1-;'E'¢' =9!--'1mm . j_:;, _. ._ ;>;H-
°I=A39.¥=l , _ .
New Yqm . _. ..i ; .': '"~ ".-.l;.§" - V Q I: I?--:' Ab 7' J1?:f';-- V t;.".~_'. - ;§u+=»1..=-1e/2?/$55"-...;%:~:».%
r-» - advlao SA
i J. scheduled*= %"f*:*~-11/2/55.*Y.f~1IsI>¢. WW. . . . . . - -
1 Q ~ -_-Z;-?aubjact_'§ Ltwo at'1:;|;'np7a. Qtntea DA' '|a5h1n892;9""'D, 12.," is to he one of the 1 a
'*"' . subject and the othgr attorney ip unknown.H ' '-5§:."'. ~"u'. 3 ;-..":.;*'5T5':-;i- wt" an-6 -will" adv1ao'Burau:u'I1_:1fl_~ I_aif'-¥ol'ibf _. Subjggtl gearing. 1- ;,. :2 H P= m..=- mar zr . !m All E. ¬."[E..mT...u}%. BJM ...,
urns;-.m m lékgm int-£=,1£>Z!92
|l.i-33'.-ii ?! ..1F4,.-'hL.92¢0av.-
.. .. _ ;. -f'_,_ ; ..'..1, 'v_ ' - "-., .. , * .' .1.1 - .. ,- r. .*F-#33. .1 ...d ¢92_-a/L I I . 4. _t_ _-,_. .- W!, in .. id A _ __.
" 1" f HI. -" _ '__V': . : .4 "_- ' - ":_ ' '_; ..:~_ 5 ti ' 1 . .. . :5 an .<;_~.'-¥--=-3*-*- 72.5%?-1~7S4. L. _ '_-.._.. -gg-_-_ I. ¥.?» "- 77¢-_,..a:.f_.I ~--' . 4 - . I-_ 1-'7. -92-. , _ . _. '| ~n . .' -~ "' >-,5_._. __.].1 ,. ._. _ _ 4- ... ._ _..,:.1-,; := * .» -- ~ ~ ~,.-"-..»+-.= 1
1¢ ¢
J2
roam
_. _ I" . _. him"?
3 _
. ..,..j-_-._.._- _ ¬=-1".»o_ , - .
I I1 RE ____ - ,. , ,1.1..».@=;92"2w;;<:!,1iB. - ....,'~"~-' 3 We *1
:._;._ Q3 V
1 -_ ~51 » _ -9 -__ ., -92-.;_-- ;92._92.,_92.. I :~.,.- .. ,.._ -»..-92 ¢"'~qnq:_I|gunw92--
Fwi "
a-1 Mn: ff? -QFW E»
~ Hui F '*>
Ai ! 1~. K, r
Q NM] 8
_92.
', . .." . P
.,_,
5.
'2-
_; '-
;';A _-F92.--Q.-A
.:= Yr ". 1
Lr
' -. =..-.'»
;:,'-§92;.';... .
Z; if: -"Tr
E_,v
21'} @-- :1:_<> -3I _ __ ___,___A;,..__.n _ t. _ .. _._-.._.-.-.-_..,.._
n- 0-19 '1-e-52/-r i 92"" "!
lautlia ones Given i '
I A Ill I I n- B
my Une Week s my
WASHINGTON, Nov. 2. - Federal Iudge Luther
Youngdahl ruled today that Claudia Iones, Communist EXC-. -1 'l
Party leader, can remain free from deportation for only one OI WISE
wee}: provided she remains in the.
Mt. Sinai hospital where she isinow conned. l
'_ Miss Iones was released Sunday.
'1 vreelt ago from the Federal Wom-1
en's eiorrnaiory at Aldersmr, W.
Va., where she had served nine
months as a Smith Act prisoner.
On arriving in New Ynrlt.she was ' "'55
greeted by 200 friends at Penn- tl j_-
sylvaniaShe slrered a sudden attack of [I I ll '1 .1 I"heart pains" last 9292[edrn-sduy and; 5was taken immediately to Mt. Sinai -
Hospital.
Although she suered from a
lerious heart :0n<;li_92i0rt while Lulprison she was threatened with]
deportation to Trinidad, British,West lnéies, by Department ofi. FF:-""'-"I='>n"
..... _: L H
Justice o cials on her release. She _, _was then released !empOraril_92' on_ 94"?/:4 -.own recognizance. _ h l /viss ones was represent e- ' /- ,for ludge Youngdahl by Bla eh ,. '4, .-C0 ,1 1/ I -'Fr man and David Rein, a - ' 7 I _laeys. ~ 2 M/V I // {T elf Nu°bUR}.qi 4 , 1. , ._ '-'Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Miss Gundy
Wash. Post and _._._.._
Times Herald
Wash. News
Wash. StarTolson
Bocrrdmcn
Nichols
BelmontHarbo
Mohr
Parsons
Flosen
Tcrmm
Sizoo
Hollom an-ii-i_
in--i
-i-i--_
_
--i--o.
ii;-i_
i
Winterrowd _..._.._
Tele. Room
_._.,.--i...
:-I , r"
,w
1_-
- ¢
P _
:'- ".,_ 1
-l r-_.~!-
""-
heF a -
.=*-'-id,
'5'_
L , I
3%. i . .
r'L_"IF_ 1; 1» -.4- -;., _ ,11. -5>.»t="r-».-"=5
1'-1" F";
.;,»__,
E.5!; _
. - 1;
-,3:
<I5-V-*A92_._._I411:-'1.-' = f*'- '1 |.
= .1-,-.-: i
:1, Hi? .~|
,2
%:*
.01" 1
*2.
92'I~'-, 92,
- . K l¢o'7¢/:0-
If.1 m &.e.etant Attorney General
- t Iuliam -re rempkine tooember 8, 1835
,v. _._V i 92X ' Q1 Director, I8! _ 7 ',?
QED-B _g_z_4_zg;;4 ppm scnogmz-_g, miih aliaeee q//@3009 tavern; sxcumzrr - c
92%>smz nor or zoeo ' / 6; rs: rue 100-veaoo AM; x 5 J
Ieference il made to my memeraaio of
October I1 and October I5, 1085, Ihieh fmrmieled
information reflectin i ea tiomed out t . 4_m__ -... _ __ _.. .¬.@' P _ 12'.»eeiier enomn ae zauu so"-wenee mac rezeaeed {rem. the rederel Refo1'mcIe'ry for Iii", Aldereem, 1
not Virginia, en Ootobere, 1955- -4
for your additional information our lea York
qrfioe cdoieed that in the eoee United states vereae
~ rrachtenberg, et :1, an order to oboe eamee any order
ekould eet be granted reetrcieimg nietriot Director, '
*I'Ei..§!'E .i"!-3"E-!°!3"_f{!'Ef!3_.f!!'!£!_-ff°!-!3£2!'E"'PUaineue vvrwl use argue}: Iy WIIIIII atone DIIUTIQI
A -:: @*.:.:':::'ss" §:;r"-,::::*::::,":::':::.:£.:;:Ountied Statefpieirici ,6'eurt, southern nietriei of
, ew York, en 5-ooember I, .196-5. The order to ehomcanoe ie an order reeirgning the deportation of
cleudia Jonee for each rice! no mould mate it
poeeible for Alexander rnehteneerg and George eleee 92J Charney to ooneult mith Claudio Jeaee to determine
J if ikatiatti go c =¬'$-1:66 for rrcoatoaberg cad karaey.1 a r r a .'92$92 -.1. anJar
I-mm
,'/J no Iouember 8, ll-SJ, ieeme of the "Dailyd-M92_92!~ l'crleI;"' homeaer, earriee an article on the firet page- ya reflecting that Claudia Jonee en rcuember 8, 1955, men92|I -' c etay of deportation fer one not provided ehe romainein the rt. sinai Hoepital where one ie non confined.
' - :4 !,,P=-v.._@I».»§iif! r::a.! poriiaaat ir.,_,'ar=a:ic.-= ic react:concerning the captioned eubjeot, it will be furniehed
you prompt! 0H111 ,/Doc - coui.eeiee_-ee_@_Ilmirotion and lioturolieoiion Service 92.
Z Nth:
Billed
, 92 1 1 92 E fl?! S/'_ J § 5 - 1
J?' - 5 I
Ih1IiL1' '*m' _' c
>
|
#4
-
__,-».* ~_
v
ah? _
2;
"2
-
_ pi
--.*._.-.
-.
.'_0ynW§v.
? 6/ 92
Ior immeai te deportation. s ate t 1H5 0* c i
d t d tl du "~ .-.,. _ _ __ _. _ ._.
--'" -- - '-"- *"' "-'l"; ; *" J-'F"o'r-7 -rs *o*1-In-I-n-can-n--sunken .--.--1
. -
'-
9--7 ' '
I.I0 . hi
.
_ 1 W-
PG 10$-9070 _
she be given a six month stay of deportation. She added that i'__
Immigration and Hsturalization Service had filed a_deportation "e{bl Ap¢O post a bond in connection with the subject's request that"*"tj J
YG 100 9070-r_ 4--._;
-ail
mmrnmn
t$i%.*¥-it
had" I1 thdrI I
the Iubjeot on Oetober 22, 1955et wae released tr the Federal Retomatory for Iunen L";Q0 ll ea Mto 1955» that the subject, aompeuef " 3,
3 1- attorney, 3 ILUIEEHI, departed Aldo:-eon, I , I. .51~_-f -
='- oathe luedatevledheea akeandobien ed*~~ F =r- ~1-We Der 6enrouteteIeIIor and ha 1!: § "' it I. , k City} t t eai tre:!.n_ _»:§.::Q 1q;; arrive in Iel York 01%! at 6:35 II on ____ ~>._.,I.,»;*:%;¥I"?"5-: e- ~ W Q" '"- W "T-oi If -RBHII eubeequently advised 35$ on oetober _fA. 1955, um; us, Pittaburgh, ma receive a telephone 4111.
s-»¬.¥'¬':92.'2L*§° {<;;% °££%;12§¬¬2: ¬£" %=. §§;2i 8:13;; *2 ¥§§"" "' e o _wadrid mi; that a Reetrlinil Order Ihieh was iesueci. by the-*=
M Zhi,-1? Eiii 5%}; i;"é%¬2§'z§ $955 ? " "*3" A?-.2 WO I IOIBOO OI *" the subject's immediate deportation'i:-om the United states,
that the Central Office or INS had instructed that their tentative
plans for the immediate deportation of the subject had been -_
3__g-epeelled in vi.ew_ er the above-mentioned Restraining Order; ,_"_'fv 3; Z,-that the deteiner, which was planed against the eubjeet at the: *1IIderl1"Refornetory for Hanan, Aldo:-son, U Va" ehould he re ,,.-.,_,_
4 ;_,novel; Ind that the subject's IHS tile should be eent to the
new lest 01'1iee~e:I nrs hr. sxosnmr advised that their detaiher =':*'"*-
the eubjaet at the Federal Rerorneto:-1 for Hone: was * =*.;"?;"
In telephone on October 21, 1955» and eonrirnel by ==r~=-W Q- *1
the Federal Retornetorg en the sane detn HI nrther ;,;_,l,=_"-"£1.
that the mbjeot'e Ills le had been sent tron Iittebnrgb -
Office. _ __ Q _ "
J!-1, lie bee niled reliable
led tilt ll 01' ult 1, ].§§;»._lIlb}Il't had
authorities would perlit the aubjeet e
rru the RibmaI en Ierk
Ibderelhad been oenoelled. vi 3. .1 _ ¢..92-ts-I P&-1" "" _
not Mi,
-ueS~Il"- -i~'=~.a
, -if" --
< ow
Pd'°'°- CUM: ENTW e
""' """'§"""*d r3"'"' %1'*-""" '" '--'- " " ' ' ' ' -, 1. *' Z -'|e'--:'1":?=."'5,*E'_'I¢-5?? 4=~¥'»-.¢----. -.-,;:'; I.-.,:~..-n, : -HIIIIIST I'VE PK}! * . * -5*-2';-*eI1s&_m§>92; > l d "1 A
- pl v» Dlt Of l A nt r Iu
9.33% - gr Qggorlntigg Received Baum ;!;Ld -
92 B_e1orJnat=r;Y_,f<=rHelen; Llderson,' Y.'Vi.-= C.foneea1ed 1 ' - 7
due manner in ,_ _whidh information - ' __ _._' -_ /{T - "
.~he1'!}-[overheard e . i ,, . -' .» _ - 7eonversetio ' P301! " ' <1 ' I151 0/-* E: British o R 10" P M V
Consulate, Baltimore,
L_1*!d.! - . M
~i.?;e.i?e192=11e7'"cc§:§eideret1on has been given to the ooneedlnenf o1"_the_.
above sou.rce'and a '1 symbol has been utilized because the identity
of the so92;I'¢'. must be concealed. - - >1;4|.
-.m-. - ' " . ._ _ _,_, _ n. -en-+11 . Q, ___,. A,..__. ._,_ ___,92 F2_wis,frece1i"ed b3r " _ _ - e ~ ~- -_;+;I7 "* a/1/ss g 11/3255* no-o 1-.p~==v,§Z¢i1-.1_ 7 t ' |=»1¢- Fs"1.3*-T7?-"7e»;
I-'1»': A ' I J 1-"1:-216
I
'1--1»au_!r_=_ _ .';.92.
I '_.' .:.I~ y _ __'" 1 Iy Idliitf - And/or Description Date where Q"
4 A
0.4 H,J
'. -,¢
,- :-1-
-71;: "'
. .¥.
4.;-4 .1* .>
A!
92 . J--._-_,»-e -§»_ .¢»'-.2.-A". _' 92 . _ , -__H,Liih_regard_to the infer attributed A_to' T-I it isjnoted that T1 J9-Haber ' sgwedvised gem: on Lufgus _;___N,/p!¬;*:r.e55,, r e British Consulate, 11-61; ' K'ey's_'er;'-'t_B1116 ~ g,_13a1 iaore 2', Md-, visited EUHICE PI. BHILIHAHP, Inmate" "i * ""5-,_1 -1.1$5§;Eg;:h'B:it1sh suE]Fct who is serving 8.1 l11e_ s e e t'or_n_921_1-d_eg:-;,_+t ' _ 1 course 0! hits visit to the Beforinator'_y_£ -;I. subject for e few m1nu_tea'inaLemuc_h as ' 7 a_s'spo1*t { "j_s""o" ff;%;_1i7 i}'§n_§_e"Eedbeen requested for subject. Miss? can 1 *e'ntI'e.3.I§';~¢j:;==-ll . §7Q§*_92l;h&l; she had verheard the eon1rersat1on' j tween, end;sub gig that &d informed subject she wopld be permi e<i_.;iro-ifYltni 0 the s es but that theBr1ti Governlet did not * f "'~
nelson: finer return. Miss added that nad given th H¢92
p
he
5?
1* t oafa§t3§"a"1:'¢b¢e' <11-ass-v.11i éo @e<==use";qrt 1=%f@;f.11*,1.4;*'fX/"'4*i;'s ms s . e _-A " .-92v-7-I
THE $031: DLVISIQH ' A a-7a,,92ns-F FAA Lg B§ZH_}[OP.K, H.Y.;_ __ -I"F - Pa?
will follow and report aotiv spojeot.
7 . -1 . . ADMDTISERATIVE PME-
' ="_* ="="LI-- -we-1--n---1»-.i__. _....1.....,....__ e~_.1
c
2
I'. '
-..
In - J
-'- ¢-.¢_¢-- ~.a..r' r
__-..f- -,1_,__._, n-.
1- -1
Til | e V ¢
H, _.1_;_-- .. rv.
.;_!.<5 2
__- 1-r- .
. EH. .Pr .
_'.i'r -
--re , -
.-- "- '
|.-
eew
, .d,1t:..
v%
.§- ': i
--;/._"3> _*.>-~;:92- > '1._ -..--:-.- "1F""; :.'=-"[email protected]<'.'I="1;??<=
1»;-Y Q. "2 7' -_.- .,,. . , , .-..~<. ,;;'>'..-
-.,-.-»'lV I_£
.1
._1'u92iB _"-2" 3
.-~_- F?
'a_._ ._;: '* 7'-.I """'é .» r 4.":-
'_-».a-= . -._ gda- 1- -. _ ¢_ .
<_ 1»
grextiqmla.
PG 103-QOTO ~V " 7 l I4.
T_|"hT92.-'1 l"'.nh'1".lH 92 .1.4-_nQ-A-IL: 92 wvaau I
One extra copy of this report is being furnished New York in
the event New York desires disseminetion to INS, New York.
It is noted that there is a discrepancy of one deg in the date
furnished by INS, Pittsburgh, and the date furnished by the
Federal Reformetery for Women, Alderson, W.V&., with respect to
the date that the INS detaincr was removed. Mr. SKOSNIK pointed
out that the Reformetorg was epparently using the dete when they
received IHS's letter removing the detainer instead of the date
of their telephone call.
> .'" f?$ _ Rgygggcsg Pittsburgh letter to Bureau, 9/23/55
. ___
.' . I"! , .
P .-.,§§'kl: .9-Pittsburgh airtel to Bureau, 10/17/E5 _ ___
Pittsburgh teletype to Bureau and New'York, 10/23/55
Pittsburgh airtel to Bureau, 11/7/55
2. _ _. ...-.
I-
Z5. -ADHINISTRATLVE PAGE
N"-aixvli
' 11 .,_
- h fulloiinn Tglggvng ggggggg gg; _
HOHr92mn___» - - rn=1L_-.-[3K me TWIHIQ f I I ' I-In Bu;
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION _4 i
$4 92 In H1:-ho
In '
If .1! 7 -1 92 ..:.
92 IrIr
Hrtmmzn sures nspmrmrr or .ms'r1cr: * aw "'_"
' Parsons
--------- -- A :oeeu_____RTEL WW ' ' . as'§§m"_'
92 l i gm} EIrsnsmit t--e _-__-.._..=, H,
, W H .FBI rxrrssnscn 11/7/55 2.uo rm ss'r m'_D /§EC'IOR
Q! 1,10J CLAUDIA VERA SCHOLITICK, Hale; IS-C, SA OI 1911.9
Reairtel, New York to Bureau, 10/27/55.
Q5 ll,/3,55--no F.,¢_,,@_;for lvmen, merson, W Va. wnose identity should be oonc
hed reliable infomation he est!, advised
I the British. and .b1<1»=~1>sA%th~1= on 8/1/ss ii»611- 12 Keyser Building, Baltimore , Hd., visited
c who isCon ate, J
EUNICE M. E3ILLH.AR'I, Inmate ll,5 3-vi, e British subje t
serving, e lige sentence During, the course of his
also spoke to the subject forer.visit to the Refomatoryw
ass ort clearance bed been requested
l _- Report follows. K P9!
' rlm."-¥fi»'-"'1 bf . J 2 A/' SHAIIKLIH sq i /W? ~ W
£;_{ I" "11 '- ' agar ..e {'1 a few minutes inasmuch as e p p= hi for ubject-Q ooniidentielllv edvised sees ens bedoverheard the conversation between "end subject; that
had informed subject she would e permitted to return
to the West Indies but that the British Government did not welcomeher return. added that med given th u jecte good dressing down because of her pas activities
__ 9,,-,1. duh»:-° P-P--.211,-"u -
he
Lat ,1 |..C " I <.; non - lndehnl ;_ - M---*1 '
TC. ..-tn, % fFBi!t ;"92 '1 ;-~. 2 O Ma l gum
_ oo- 2 90 swsaso HAIL! d3 ... 2 - New York REGISTERED MAIL!
. .e 1.! F _ ...-~ e an - I1 ...I ,0. W. °*n /_é:?.;__7'2%f@ /5.-»~m- I *192P1M- 51"" fa Hm; TTAIJIQ!A bu? Com *: '~f;--_' 8 1955
Fin '__'-_'1-I.. I
Q 9292 5,7? , $<X¥§»6 fl £F?T1v&, Sent__a,;;_____I Per___
- - --e --I-.1 - --N _1___-__..,______ __ __ __ 1.._ _.._.-._-__.-__-_-.__
C 5 ' II. u' 1 1 Hr. B1,, _
1 ll:
lb.
Ir.
iir.
Hr.
HL
lr.
InFEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
L"P'=. g a
-+_
1
22"j 'A. _S. ' _er .
Z» .~ 5'5"
I ii 1."?
4; L
. .-
r *3 =-. 92 -he .
: Tt't*3?"..
5
1;;
i i
@525
1.
Q
err
Pr, I. _2»: ..;.28 92" .1 ;_2§ -.;
r J
-=1
"Ya?~ge=.§-:3;'1 ff 1 FD--122' l1'nnuu|Iu|u||n.ll L» I--1" ,_ - -
Oi Memorandum - UNITED sures GOVERNMENT
'1'%h= Director, FBI 03-72390! °* "' 11/10/55
3° = sac, New York 00-18676"!
""BJ"°'= CLAUDIA 1TERAS0M{OD~IICK, was
IS-C; sa-Lo Card U.T.D- /-
4-22 ~13/u-
It is recommended that a Security Index Card be prepared on the
above-captioned individual.7/?
/'
um:The Security Index Card on the captioned individual should be
changed as follows: Specify change only!_.L
ALIASFSW c_ We *_
N FEIVE BORN NATURE-IZED ALIEN
COMMUNIST SEIALISVORKEE PARTY INDEPENIENI SOCIALIST LEAGUE
lhrl-92 11/92r92 nwrnnhue -.--. -...-.-. __-__-_ _.__ --
1.5.0 run unzruun TAB run UUFBAB RAGE SEX
DATE OF BIRTH PLACE OF BIRTH _ c _
BUSINESS ADDRESS Show name of employing concern end address!
___ __ rl! I1Cl"Q."__?§!Fn"7 !_921 92--1! ~.{.:Z|...A92 -rl92H-5
I-'. "' ,;'i E777' 7 7 7 7 I ..I._l92 I: -Al. 7 W H 77 A r
} KEY FACILITY DATA: ?;j"1" I ..£ B -165$ --GEOGRAPHICAL REFERENCE NUMBER H, ; .
- T"b1cINTERESTED AGENCIES c __ ___c__ p_ _ c _,__
1 . StT¬Ct, NEW YUg:Km hrk Q E.! ---use7 T i " "bn E0 Nor REC !:' ~41,
i"'9292P ... "Q _ it _QI.;-;iit'1A$E§0-F T-3 "FF .1 r92- ~ ... ~.: re» 1 -y-Ii H8 seer, -in »1% 1»
4-750 Z-T-T9]
ML
£Z/
Cl
S
Q
l |Li
2/
XXXXXX
XXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXX
XXXXXX
FEDERAL BUREAU OF NIVESTIGATIDN
FOIPA DELETED PAGE INFORMATION SHEET
Pagvtsi withheld Oiitirely at this lncatinii in the file. 0110 or more of the f'0llovi.ng statements, when-
indicat0d_ explain this d l¬l.iU]1.
Deleted undvr Oxoniptioiitr-4! ___ ________________ _______ - with I10 F~0§.{1"t{.{t1|il '
material availablv for release to you.
liitiimiaition ]] Ii£iiIl i only to :1 third p{lI1_92' with no rcferc-nce to you or the subject oi your requvst.
lnihrrmition pertained only to u third party. Your name is listed in t_hQ titlv only.
[ 'urntnt s! originating with the t'0l]mi"i1ig gO92+'¬3l']'l]TlC*ll.[£1g ?I'lC92 i S!
M, T ..._ __?._..._ . was/vrere forwarded tn them for direct response tn Wu.
Pagetst refewed for consultation to the Following ,r_{092-'9!nnient ag01ic{v i9s!; is
_, _ ___ , AW, _ '4. as the iiiformation originated with them. Ynu will
be ad92"iSed of a92=ailahilit_92-A upon rvttirri 01 tht= material in the FBI.
Pagvis-J withheld for th * f'nllr19292'i1ig reasontsli
For your infnmiatiunz _
The following number is tn he used for referent-0 regarding these pages:
ivq - la_$t0 r i>i;>_ it
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxrotxig§ DELETED PAGEiS>
X NO DUPLICATION FEE X
X FOR THIS PAGE X
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
.. l_.,, . _,_._ .».:~ll ---A» g-__- - -*4-en:-: ~ , t A > _ -,; _ _ __
. I -I | -
AIRTEL
DEPARMENT OF JUSTICE
* 1" UNITED sm
11/9/55 - BY
Transmit the following Teletype message to: BUREAUWe - --------
i5_§;'COMPROS! NY _ ! ]M!:!!n92|lf|o;gqn92_|-5-£511?" Rex!92 1 " J _ I _ ,, t " ;." ' '-' ' J! 92'-I1"li- _',; |I;,I_,j
CLAUDIA VERAGQCHOLNICK, was =92.' _,:....3.."...- -
e. gigs ear 01? 191m 1'1 1'9?!
' ' a
ReNYairtels of 11/1/55 and 11/2/55.
P.
r -,"._ .':..-~ -' "-.{¢r:'-:»&- 1Q
.t;-"-* -
3',_ represented by AUSA/THOMAS A. BOLAN, smrr
'9A * -- -- A --- -p- ~_-_- ~ - - 92..4-___-r- --5--¢.q~' 1p_..l92____. _,__._e.
I-| qrln 1 _ I r P.M
I Ir.
Ir. Hsrbe_____
llr. Hob!-__,___%
ll .
Mr. Tamm
Hr. Simo______
Mr. Wintc-rrowd_
Tile. Room
Mr. Ho11omnn__
Illa Gmd3___
1"-i-PI-"I111
c/M?-J
US District Judge EDWARD WEINFELD; SDNY, this date
_ denied order to show cause why order should not be granted' ' restraining District Director INS from departing CLAUDIA JONES.Judge ggnted time for defense to take deposition from subject,C§_Aj_Q]QIA__ %QN]5_S_. Stay will continue on a day to day basis starting
Monday, ll/lll/55, until deposition is complete. Right to""te.ke
2-1 is
L-.-.1-1 "
_@"r~1
- 92" V
"1 Vi-'1-,
Q; ':"'
.7-4
4
';;.j
a-
1
., .-;¬__Ir _
_>- .»
-t/--H:-""
I t ;
. '-"'¬7':: =1!- -17.3-,:_.,}.--.
§;é'."11 I5
J" ,-~-, »= -;'__.." f. " -VJ
. '_ , - 1'.-7'1,
4 _. £2 r5" .5 *
?e;__a .
7.4 .="I, ._~ ;
sub 2: :1-$1 I 92 s. ___. ¢-=__-;" ,-. F59. - A 3%; t t ~wsR@~<>t»;§
2; 1_£92%'.";,, ~ , -L__n&_ _ _Q
9292
1- '»
I
BQHIROI
9%
s sop: sfLII -ISL
'E?s.!1H!?§E?é?aT§E§! Eii
EtiE§iE%§1!i8}¬3L%3S§f_I_E s -I, 0
1- o~§'~r -E I I- =
- III roam II - 8 -1 » _ _ _;_ _ .s I . _. _
=vs I'll-I
Isrsrsnss q strtsl 11/9/55» _ n
we-,1 m91us_s_. sous on n/11/55 nsds sv5p3_u£_
ordsr sigma u usn: znmm vxnursw on 11/nus; .
which dsnisd ordsr to show ssuss st Isfsndsnts RACITEIBZRQ
and cHARIF:! Otlylng ttsportltion st CLAUDII JDIES, to snsbls
than to sonsult with hsr and possibly ass Jar ss 1 vltnsss.
Qrdsr tuxtnsr ststsa 1: mm Q11! mt subsit ts t;1r._1J_, Q! ..
deposition on 11/l.l|,/55, sportstlon would is stfsct-sd forth-
with, nnlsss tbs:-s ass ssm sthsr srdsr outstanding, staying
her dspsrtst1&-
cp_Q_-.._j__l-n_ -.1-.L-._-___ x A Q 1 -slain-magi; I-.-_ -J_.-.J_-J
IXIIKI-U 'I IFFUPTIQ Y-HI uuflll XI GT1-II
AURA IOLAII that as dsposition would bs tsksn tron NIB.
A sspy at tbs shows srdsr is Using ssds an szhitlt
in I! 100-18616-18
I nnnssss-I |92nn._17 Du lulu 92-bvv J aurus1-II
1-I!_ ____s 5/J
t tint! 92
- -: 92 'I92
92
92
-I
I
A
I
,-
1--4'
i_.n-:__".._;§',
7"--=I
'92'bg-I
- --a
J A_ _r
I: -"£53..
F-
. -5
0 ;_"§f"1- .
bu.
-s
AF<-. .;!Jg_'_921~_;_11:&bBY:,2&EJ-._l92
.~ -"
bf_92?r~
-é
- T-
.1,.
.7Transmit the followingTEL/ c O
. AIRFEDERAL BUREAU O 2E%¤FIG1IION
UNITED STATES DEPABT QF
ml 10311. IL
11/9/55
CD
CLAUDIA VERQ SCHOLNICK, I&s¢ IS - C, S1 - 19hO-
furnished by AUSA T. AFD-36
TICE
Teletype message to: UREAU' I
Pursuant to info
on 11/9/55, the records of USDC, SDNY were checked.
F. X. H0 GOHEY reflected that on 11/7/55, USDJ JOHN -
should not ued an order to show cause why an order
' ' IFS fromiss
be issued restraining District Directmr
om laint depa~ting subject pending disposition of a o p
t b subject alleging that order and filed same da e y
ti n are now void and illegal in- warrant of deporta o
that the statutory provisions upon which they are based
qta e denial to subject of substantive due process or
i hts and privileges under law in violation of her r g
der to show cause is 5th Amendment. Hearing on or
scheduled for 10:00 s.m., 11/10/55. mm.
Fiiiii ;S .I".$§.."'.'t;;§>lr~ AU.!%é¥UR?.1T!BNp_CQNIAB
IEO t" Tale
| I-IN Belmont I
E ' BwiwaaKELEY
1LLI '11 TI» eH'AUDumnmrs - FIIID
nxcnrr -we
OHEEWISE
K1
/ 0 ;_z-1.3.20 - - Bureau 00-T2390! RM! L¬*_'9292¬J 9 |92|n~31r 955 i
0 - B6 6/I _ #1-5!-¢ ¢--IIII1
"% Approved ' out 5 per
e Agent in harge
, W1 5 2 NOV 301955 _/tho
-._______
ll. B1300
lh;wmQ;;;[£1-de-HR00m_______- UFe
A
54¢,
4 , ,-"// "- 5f
4-0-723%
' 92
1 ,
a = - {
_ ....~_-:7-.11.!-~T-
"""">-:'_ -W
~ -i.-'
-4" .
H _.
»_-_ av '*"¥-Z-.,.r 7 ",' _kw v _
3 _. J -t
__ 1.» .-.-_.---0!-1' . .
='_:'__...;.:___'_:.
1.. _. ix __+-. V" L -I1 ,-- -= .!§§=-.5?-*1§5 _- _:'.$_>'~"__
ii
~ = rrs- -.
v 1 _.._..1-_;f.j'.f92_';__".3 - f. ., .,._.-,~,.,¢- ,. ...-.- ~1-- -"1f.£,.".-an.~¢.. _ ,_ ;-4; .'~z=_';'a*<,g-. _-;-11$-is .3..;_~,_-P.--Ff! -.--W. -. - ,1
'1; Hm-v-é,:'T]I -r:'=" "Q-5'1
..,_' "1 AL . . .
¢
_.,,_
4,4-..-'-:
. . .1
g. . bad}.. 4 -; - ;92- 921 ... >9-
' ' .92¬,<:-.._
a~A*1 z:s:=
m..-
-1L__ _,... J. _._,_E_~__n¢_-3*;
* ,. :- ' ' W-Iw'-92 1-. .'
¢.-|-'."*; "< _
.'@ .. _, -.,
".92 '>'. ~-'.
'<.- :9.
" .'=;.n-¢:~ ._
.-_.~.92. _ ;,7'_1'?j. . - »
..:
"". 1-.r' ,.L; -_~_ ~ F. -9» "1I.- ' . _ .v - - " -M ,- ' -1- ix-»!**.~?-!?"§1 ". ' ' " :§'3z'i~=¢?§-e.~.*.;.§%.._ -' ,5; pi» -92,_ -_92. . @-Wr; --., .. i__ -if-:1; ¢_"; ,,-R in _92._'F"J-:?92-*A--92¢.I-|i.;Z,-$5-_":; E.< '!92'.1._J .V; I. __.-_-r., a§_;:U!:;2M_1- 1..-. _. _ ..~I= _ r. ._ J Ch I. I ___ __ _ . F
.'_"' .~. vi "- - !_g -'J,"- Y '
' 4 . :.- =*.. 1.. -- » -;' .1~V _. . , 1,, .. ., _ .
.2 -pm
. nu
. -»"_ '. +_ ==- ""' - .- ' _ _.-. .4 .. v . A - - .,_..? ___. _ ,.,. _ _ ,_, .4 __ v..
I _;. _ .
tel
E.A revoked the restraining = 315.953.- P a . - . _.$2,,"-1. prévejti "IHS",l't;t.'|.O!l}.10_QaQpQr|il.b1Q1;jD1'._,l!1'bJ§Q-Q13-Q1:,- at J,q.':j5§31.M..pnVth'_e sgm_e i1a1f.,8 gubjeni 1~?§s*'re1_e92g.5§-_>l§ _ pauzqm: *om M, -Sinai n<>pp1g;1, movie:-k C1t§~_*_-¥r?g,$' ~"?%,:."§="s-.' .-... ._
-
. --_/1 »..
-1?-92. §_; 0,1
92~._, .,
F4 Y _' " _. E . ~,v ¢.;'§-;~ _§;-é,_-;_,-»..-.- 1- 1,... m-Pi" .r--.-~~ _ _,_ .11"-*1 - I -£:.-W. 92g~'-_?g,'.='" - .:'- *..":&-".~ A M" i=~'?:; "**- w~-~ *
75- ..___ -' 51V I I Q .1 t 5 r
.. Q1 I!; '_.|p
§E:$@;r ',' '7,
.".".-'~-
¢_. '
|9292Irm;
. in-~ .',..»"_ 9292-,,g_,.j':|:'¥".-y
' 1..-=<=. .-42!.. Nev.Y°=k
.1955 f . E B I-'_ '
I i '7 ' ' '~ e-.. '."'~'-I -' . .;_TJ._..& _ .._._. ~-,,,'..~>_-'.@¬_ .,_,_. ..,, .. ~' _; F - . , _ ,,_ _ 1 _ _ _ . .. . .?i,.!_ ; , , . _ .., .12"-5; x .. _:T__. §,.f$~.;g:M¢E|:__»¢92_! ._?,::fA'-fa, 3,-.:,__}r,,.;92.$,,.g:.r:= 1 f.§:1_..;g J!» » I ..I. _. _H__ ». ;= é __. .§_q~___~ '|?|a.92--'l'_"i§~. '~_-é f I *§*:"=..'g~.
ET; .§.t't°d V?-?3'. t---3. >-¥t'§9§'-n§l 7'--two?'.'aLot1..onl .;i1t'JISDC.,' '$DR'Y»" "F0191 gulr ,
d ribed as Delaying tactics wh1=h.wti9.n§_.BFBMAN B". . .- P-P.9Y.0n!: ;aub:,1gpt'.g >3.:;n;q._os'1_1=1;9?.'.=1=11q31:[f~frn1=.1_<=!=1_-@; - =5!"'he'iari'r1'g' 1n "oonne'ct1on'w1th one such na_b1on.I11_0<l
" subject! W111 139
,2 3q1.19.1'§@. ._8 9.
55 z":1-I,-_ 5 Q
"nn;g»<3 _
.100 11359-. '
. 1.-' _. ._ ' »- . .~
.-.- "_-I . :, - ~ .. -- . ' - . 1' ~
,. O v*7'-1 :17-"TL:-,'.4-_.,3.r-=.r~.-é-_ ' ,4,» -_ '~. ' -_, ;_ _-_' | .11
*92§m,4;i92.92- ' /H _ - .-;§ _1_e"'1§16y'2'8T 1§55,;¢,!- 3'fiIB,4;._>. _ ..'_,. K
*"" »I'n . . .-I, a"~?I~';--"J.-F"-%:' '
A ..1:1 at USDU.|"?SDUY',
b4~/- .. .* ,5. " , '1». , ,_.;__-1 __ u _ _ . _ v _ ha; .
. -; . . V F . , ..92 -H - .__ _' .. , . V -_ . , - .. P A5 , ' ,. -- _ -._ _ Q4 s L. 1 ,-'1 - __~.' - /-'_ ' , ~ 15" j 1 '_§;92,f' "....'=,~ '~ _;'_- rL- 1'_'- ... -».. *5. ...:_ - - - _ _ .' 1-: -tr. ' . » -'fJ|<T'-' sf. I-1}. |.-_ !¢_;,;.L7n92- .§__ ,;';'929'-- 1§,_ .f~__ ',.Q I Q _ ' _ i ml I ;f .E' 92.'92I-' 1 I-= . .,=,_;. ' ' '- - P 2,- .' I * .- ,v ,_ -.. -J j ,_92, -*1 Y V J__ ' 55$ !~%I:n_ S sszrmn . ' ' -. '< { .
1- ._ . _-_ .. . F , _- - , . I-w ' - - 92. - * .. . __: __ 92,.,.-'_ 4._92._-,i___ ; .{,_ ___I T ! t 55: - I EXCEPT $30?! 1'1 1.1,-',-"Tr& ' ;?_§,§';1"?'.;»_".' é -_;'=>;.7~ .-,.~.'1-f5_ "
-r--'-X '. .. V " "-92 k ' -- ,. .' 92 .. -.:',-" '-'"~.,;-y -.- '3' -. .. ' ' . l-'- . ' "L."-'. 1, ?=""§a". L _-_é;.';'";$f ' {T-;..' ' _:'.."§&1*~a.'-S--T F
3'" 5 ' ¢ - w " » ' " " fl-i§'~rY92',
1°?-.1*?'.§Ié??;> -$3? *1 '§*="L92~"*L-53' "
*"'..'m '..r";' 1-.., " " "K" *-
£7£39o»
_/'1'
.....-.--1
_ =~~
&*-*~
2'5: 4""
"..,. *5-
. Q, _--
+64---I
H
._._;92., _. ._:.~, =1;-.:c. _?,' -"».e.= r _,.__...L,._,;.,,q..._1'./.<.r.-=5!,'92'~"§."3.';-:3-..-.'.-i
'_--.',:' 1 ..-a
' - . "-uizi '
K. _»-
l.-7 ' 11
_= I.-,"~":'; _-. -I_,,.. 1
~ :., |_ _l,,_ I
$511.1 .__
."
fr;-_;-4'-_: ' ~
Q 'J!.';: "f-ii
-@'*"1J: .'-..-I w --' -4s - - -Y I _- _; J.. .1. .
0._ -_- 7
- ' I J g}
FEDERAL BUREAU or nw STIGA on Q
UNITED STATES DEPAHIFIEN OF STIC3
AIR TEL - - W - ~ _ - - _ __ _
" .Ll/ 10/ 55
Transmit the following Teletype message to: 3351553
0
CLAUDIA VERA SCHOLNICK, waa; IS-C; SMITH ACT 01* l9
Remyairtel, 11/ 9/55 .2. :uh-m. ____
..: ,;;....'""f'"~
Ir. lemon
Ir. Ia:-bo____:r. Iohr"0 PI-l1~'|I..,.i,
Ir- ROUen..__
In 'lum_____
Ir. Blue ,_____
Mr. Winn-rmTale. Baum ___:__L
It H0l.l0tnan__
lib; I g;
I la zz.'::.r.1c... e
I .
AUSA HAROLD BABY, SDNY, advised this date that
Subject! hearing on order to show ceua signed by USDJ
JOHN F. X. MU G-OBEY on ll/7/55, was adjourned this% until .l..L/1.7/55, by mutual agreement-
KELLY
bf] Q
lmn sun T41
-
L - 571 P [email protected]£=2~>'»i*@'% * 10 - Bureau 00-72390! egiauered Hail! 5
1|. U
EX .. N 1%omcgn IF-U-IQ
_ , ,|..--"~,_1'};»_i"_§1 ._ ..~ _.F _.'.;.'L:.'.i-.l-» -"1: - 1;- " -- :1 -I !!.'|§ £ .7 AZ..-.~=. .:> ~. -=-I
Q ' 03080338
Q- B no NOV 231955 Q1rdata
57¢
/5 7
o » - ""-" ..;.l._Z__1 _---v
Approved in . _ - Sent, __ P! PerSpecial in Charge * d *?i§2 NOV 33' ..
um -
='§'.5? 3
4»
- .J_
~r-5" 5 .1.
2'
£Ti=
pI-1 .
~
'. - j-=-
I. _._
V
crest-' " .
._: _-'=*.'7.Iv92 '1""1" 1--.£' '.|-= ,,u I-Q;-';:. -- .: », _-pt
1' 4'9F5 I-/. T-92'_'"' 'i";-1""
..'_;. ~ -
-T ._}..a»-
..,.-u-
.
- -.- har-.-..':
" :':.- - '
'*.-._ai"-;-
t
>1'_§-'=§5-,_§'*"-Q--qg' ' v O .
= .
war.
. _ -I--.. 0'4,,-
.__,n-i
.I -a
."n ...
4 - _' Q. I 9
AIR-TELFEDERAL BUREAU STIGATION
tmrwsn smrss nsr Mam cross cs
New York 11/17/55
Transmit the follé-ring Teletype message to: BUR U
CLAUDIA VERA SCHOLNICK, was; IS - C, SMITH CT Of
Reference my airtel of 11/10/5 7-"/AUSA HAROLD RABY, smrr, aavishis date that
act on on co laint chargi deportation uncon- further 1 mp ng
stitutional and order to show cause signed by USDJ MCGOHEYon ll/7/55, was to be discontinued under stipulation that
subject would voluntarily accept deportation to the UnitedKingdom on or prior to 12/9/55. It was further stipulated
in a reement that subject would initiate no further liti- 8
gation to stay or halt her deportation.
INS agreed to refrain from further deportation
efforts until 12/9/SS. An order to this effect was submit
this date to usna McGOHJ':."Y, smw, for his signature. 57¢
KELLY
Qsmsrsker
EAU 00-72390! R-EG-IILAR MAIL!at 521,2J 92 92. b 9292 --. E- _4__;;_i;._ -..
_.92 . Tql5u1|_____' 1' _ Hr. Board.mgg__4 _Hr. '5c.">!s2 nsvwtI Mr. 11 , '
c h -_.-......n-.--_-n-a---- --
Hr.
Hr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
I-Ir.Mohr_____PlI'BonL___
Ros-en
Tnmm______
Sizoo
Winten-owd_
Tale. Room
Mr. Hollomgn
@~=d:_._
ii?4
- 111$,,,@_'-j92'_92 _,.,. :1 GU17? -w 1 my plmlm UQSIFIED"'~'; :;'=.1=*-=3 _ axes"?! '"" " "
""'.-.--~n'~: m-!F-W153J
. . .2. /rm 0 i},
Q
¢,--_-- t
§
.3 r
-.=~'- -e2»? ~
Ir. "
_¢
:1- T.
.->;"i..=~=;¢.¢:_ -7;,?r#_£J£1---?92
5,3» 1-111,1-I., !-r, _"' -_r,t-J-H2,--V gm
VVH
Q.-H
1:I ~- . -"""-92 .1:1 C »Ik J Assistant Attorney Q-aural ~' Iillian r. lolpkinl |ovu_n»:;.!1:>. 195:
1".
Biroctor, FBI a1
92
o ' 1.1 mu ouuc ii n aiiaao I » -- 92 gu-rnugrz. smug?! - c" t ' .5 / if
SHIT}! ICT U? 1959
RECORDED_32_I'BI P110 100-72190
EX-125 K6; lofononco ia moo to Iy nonorandam of
~92 Qctotcr 21 Qctotcr 25 one !ovc=her 3, 1955; thickE53 ., x urniahod information oonoornin tho ca tionol,__._ Qq ouhjoct hottor known a iohonoa o no
:2: r ooon _. Q. roloaood from tho Iodo o ornatory to ,
f_;.,- f}9292 ildoroon, loot Virginia, on Octohor 23, 1955.
» _-_ 1 :1 J .' " ..'._ ,3; !'or {our adiitional information according
' tho Baily orkor" of Iovoabor 10, 195$, Claudial onoo on Iovoabor 9, 195$, no iron a otay of
ooortotion tor tho nu-nooo of taking .a dopooitioa
iaihn .a..1¢'»;=ua iojotidanco 1» out trial of
Goo:-go llako Charnoy and lloaandor Trachtonhorg on
Saith Act chargoo.7 ,.-.c
the hcari" ichcéuloé tor Ciauci: Jones onIovanbor 17, 1955, 21¢» woo to challoogo hor doportation
ordor no cancollod. On Iovonhor 1.7 195$» AaoiatantUnitod Statoo lttornoy liavold Baby §outhorn Diotrict
Yoo!'_lioI York, advigoql our_lloI_!'ork_ 6:r_1;=¢ out Iurthor _
ction on tho complaint charging that tho doportation or
Claudia Jonoo Iao unconstitutional and tho ordor to ohm:* cauoo aignod by Unitod Btatoziliiotrict llcghoy 0:1 :;;;-an-.;;zz;;,';;.;; :;;....:::::§":..:: ::.,:.-,.:$. °"
to tho Unitgd Kinfdouaondoi prior to lgogazoglg, 1953. ..__tuaoturtor otp to nagroonon u<iia_ onao Y
would initiato no furthor litigation to stay or halt hor A
doportation. Tho Immigration and Naturalization Sorvico
* ass"-aid to i-ofin froi further deportation ifforta until
Docombor 9, 1955 according to Aooiotant Unitod StatoaAttornoy Baby. in ordor to this offoct was ouhnittod on
Toloou_i otonbor 17, 1955, to Unitod Statoa Diotrict Jud.go"KcGoh
outhorg iiotrict ofNo92I !ork;';>£p_1f,_hio aignotprog'3Zi§i"_Mr1 .'~ - HEM ST - P LIE:-1 1, - J"; H ' =7u=:»____.i - J £JE3uH2a,_:_'
:;;::~-:.,» h V;;;_;;=- Q"-1 1! }92U_'f _,. "i _ * _-~_- r |Eqlla: ,g'{"!v é _ JVUV Ud
',..P .-rT.»v'
i-1
5 _
- a
.--.
Fa.
~92-J
rr
V ,
'_ _3I a-'1'
F
ff;
v
_. 3.
. -1.-4 K 92-
92
Latter to lssistsno Attorney Gsnsrsl
Illliss !. Tompkins
According to the Daily Iorkor' of
lovsahsr 21 1955 Clsndil J oh , onus is I sdulsd tolssvs tho Unltsd 5tstos on Dsossbsr 9 195$, thisvo1untsr1:l.doport1n; hsrsolf. ssoorilag to tbs"D;1.1y Io 1-" the liszloul Cosstttu to Dstsad
Segre iiiii?ihii iii inaoieii iii Qiiiiii Jiii
had boon forest by 111 hsslth to rs! hsr sirrsst
ohsllspgs of tbs lsportsslon srdsr. lbs 18
sobsduls to lssvs on tho 'Qussn I11lsio92h.'
If any additional psrtinsat istoristlon
1s rocsivsd oncsrning tho dsportstion of Claudio
Jonas, 1: 1111 ho furnishsé to 7ou.youp1y.
Zoo - Gonsissionsr
Immigration snd lsturslisstton Barrios
oL;]Q_
1'!!!"
-Z.-
_ 92. ' *5-'. .' ~_"_';. u ?
P-
' .-
~' I4 .
'92
3'4 _
' r?=3.-I~3-'"' "1-"*1"
f§;
' #-
F
92
1
-1;.
2
'.1
,~.."- '4
- it-:'i:'-A-.5-11
fM» - - ~ ew~e:e.e;..e- - _1:Pf _ .._l:__ _ ____ :
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION l>'::.Moh1-_.__;
r
Hr"a."--h
UNITED STAT " EPKRTMENT OF JUSTICE" -- _--_- Elmaq
l n 11/21/5592lr. Si.zoo_______ Y
Hr
Transmit the following Teletype message to: 31133;;outrun vxméscnoxxzcx, nu? -i§_-'3 -5- ' " ' _Z--._i-,-,
ma He °g1n£;;g/2.551? advieegl ibis date queen Elizabeth sails
E? Bureai JG i;;,3y;s'
£16
H. f- -I '/ £2 ;.......
I? r~1ov221e;5
:_Sent__ A "H Per.1'ohn...__*
Kr.
Ix. 1
Ir. 1
Kr. Ha
. Plnom.._.....]
. Rolm_.._._.._
Hr. Tl.mm_._._
. Winewi Tele. Room_..i. h
Mr. Hol1om.|,n___,_
Mine Ga.ndy___
A , sum; AC1 191:0. - ,__
4 7-/
M1121 Sin-.n.nm=nm'rzwill volunt-ax-11/1 désgari: US uncle; 8:'§§§;;°§§';'; ;;1,'§§,. %9n-99'? E' -9-5" 933 -"- 7/22¢ 1:6 1.:-i.i=u:ur au?;Li6I.'.l Iii? Olriing55" 155!§§5I= =921P¢'1"VI§1'6H '6r sub eet 87>-e?T6!£5"l!IE&'§?"
The Daily Worker this date e 1 nf y nueh or the above information. ' pas ' c°_;;1;¬h@':°
o r"?Tmm! '
h .
-._ _-V.-I
_--.-1-1"-"
*_~-in Bf'-IIFiII'£'1;-'. R
1
-I
11- _,_,_._ .;_- .--
I
,-.pI.,-_- ..
_k fl._' "_ ¥.'
_ _ O...:~ ~
|._A1.0 .. -- n
_-1,;_'._,..:£;" 1.,.5 .-v . » 92'. _d _r __;
A»'.;A-I;'-1*.-3_ .v.;,
P
=5
.'- - 1:-1
-.-.__
~.-I -.9--92_.'Q: ~<--*-2.- '__j '1
_ ' 1-, -r"
_;__- -|_- "~ k'r n~ -1» Baum
1 rai<'~
-92 "' _" 4DFFZY . 51:,-.1 _ ___ 1» /-. Ch..1 ~~~~~ -~ , - _ ___ I A avY} //If-~"/7:57 b/l"7sEaE1'F 5.. aw-an 1!. ms- {.
In 1.m.u um aéiuzn, nun auuoa
, 5._ /{ nut lahlnlai lag-nth 9uquuugu;gu?n ' ': an "/W3- arty , all , WV.-l_'"lQ_1!!!l.§l_1II'F_.§%§lillm.illbanbar
or tho altar-nala Iatlanal. Otittaa It tha Oahnnllt '1
Part7,wL.lhaha.abaanlntlaG@l§.l.ltPaI'I1 ,atnaa about 1933- Manila Inna alalna ta bin A
tun barn Q rahrnary I1. B15 In I1-lanai,an-um; Uaat mu», an u ash: a Ital-an magma.
elaudla Iona: an an-raataé by an $151-anon anl
- Inwrallaatten larvlna 0: Oatabar 23, 1950; ll A
law Ia:-Ir cit; na an altan Gaaaniah aha na
aa:-nad a napartatlan Ina:-la; an naaanbar 2511990, q
. uni can Irdarai it jar dnpirtuticn 92was ham in abayanaa lnlilnath as lha nay!-an along I1!-h Itbar Mn dauannlat Part: lash:-a { dentin A 1; -at nu manna. anaaaaaaaauuaaalamu-y £1, ~<>
1953; and bagan Ill'Il.I1g bar pa-Lana a-aatanpa at ana Ainc:-andanadaranlanuaryl-1.!-9SS~ nhana K _ralmaad ts-an tha radar-at llararnaaarg tar 1-:-nan, A
Aldaratllg Haas Vlrgtnh, an oaaabav 3, 1955. ma 1
anvernnant pl-oaaaéad with aaalan ha attaat I 5
Buuu iunaai can:-utian span bar I-aiaua inn ' ;
priaan. Bna annaaatal tnla lava:-tartan. . '
an Iovauibar 21, 1955; tnrvrnatlon noabut»: tr-In tho Iantgrattnn and laturallaatlan i
rm-viaa ratlaatlag that tlaulla Ianaa U111 aalumlaa-My
depart Unitas! stat-ea maar warrant at daporliatlan ~
for London, Lngland, an Daaanbar 1 1955: 800011! Ato tbs Daily Rania!-"' It Iwanbar £1, 1955; _-ciaudia ionaa ia aahadulaa ta iaaaa aha niiaad sutaa
On thl "Quanta £1I.ll»bath.¢"
It la qulta poaalbha that budia lanai
will ba closely aaaaalabad with other calmuniata 1-I ,
England upon bar nrriiala Plrtlealn-11 with H 1., A
John vlnlnuon, nanbar at Qha llatlnll. Gcuzittac
at the Caummln 1-arty, Usn, lllw pan tanurbaa ta
hnwwq W73! 1» 1955-? .- -- ~ . .. . =M. _ -~#AA'=¢;>>;g,; AA ~ A-A 1 _§<;T'_-__ 2» -bmdon 1 sncmz-:1: ma con"amh }.~l
Ta m '21 -M no - Foreign Liaison Unit M6 -Tf¬Z° ; sa92zr., §P><,><" j {BGaatly _--ii
Tullon ___....._
Banrclman _i
Nichol!
-I -
1"":
51!.-
.. .3 ;-
..._
1'-
5'--5
131
3;
?'?
2.f[}
_ g
r_ . e:
rt.-.'-7'-3 - 3'
assess
Ft: »;i.'.,_ gt
;_ae=.-st
..J-.-
_;, .-
J-.. 'lb- 1.- .
.. ,_ a
?S.'g_
4;. 4- -a .4
-"v_:.',' .';-.7
I - :
.'vi-,_
Q_ _~4-. -..... . -- ~ .--4 - ;._;~ .~-__ ir- - " , -|-- J'._.__._ ~ ___,____ V
10-1'
, Mr. Tainan at
-N Mr. l92'~-use1" _ ' ' 11 U.92'd_.Imigration Commissioner Joseph M. Swing annouced the deportp¥ioE§°$:T .
_-I Mr.today of Claudiegcholnick, alias C British subject,Ho1!ornan_._
Gandy___
a warrant charging that she was active in Communist Party affairs
her entry into the United States.
Mrs. Scholnick departed for England today aboard the "Queen 1
Elizabeth" from New York. 5
Ms. Scholnick was horn in Irinidad, British Fest Indies, Fehruar§L
21, 121;, She last entered the United States at New York, February 9,
192k, as an imigrant.
A warrant was issued for her arrest on October 27, l9hT under
applicable immigration laws making membership in the Communist Party
a ground for deportation.92§l9292 The Board of Imigration Appeals dismissed Mrs. Scholnicks
I appeal from the Service decision finding her deportable, and the order-. { M Mr. Ti: Tin ., .' J///i/.:,;: r¥;; .;.;.r/1-on IMMEDIAEE RELEASE V q /I onnt.92 _ Jamar, nscmmn 9. 1955 5, | C "
3/
92
_.,a
_J__:______,¬ ..
"I92:
.¢;_J
'.r -' '-
-v
u_
$7 .- -
;-fw I;'._l.--_='.".;'92T ; '2.
5.? -,1 .4! ;'I:-,-A..'!~¬-"-5" 17;!-..-_-,-,,g.* .. _..7.-1'. --1.!" .92~,;,|92 "1.-T";. .- rs . p
' V 1
j ' i
f._ .-w~_ . _'. '*I"~~r
,_; . ..'/--.'._ -.'-. ~-, ...m1§-::_/¥an§J
s? ,
a
ifgi 7
§.;-J. '.'¢-T :
r - '
i
' +4r" {K1
- 92.. -"
QEB IMEDIATE RELEASE . F,a:rAY, nncm-ma 9, 1955 'nswnrmsrwr or JUSTICE M
1Immigration Commissioner Joseph M. iaéng announced the
I
today of Claudia Scholnick, alias Claudia Jones, a British subject,
a warrant charging that she was active in Comunist Party affairs after
her entry into the United States. f,¢71C7
Mrs. Scholnick departed for England today aboard the "Queen
92~_2
Elizabeth" from New York.
Ms. Scholnick was born in Trinidad, British West Indies, February
21, 1915. She last entered the United States at New York, February 9,
192k, as an immigrant.
A warrant was issued for her arrest on October 2?, 19%? under
applicable immigration laws making membership in the Communist Party
, a ground for deportation.
U
L1 The Board of Immigration Appeals dismissed Mrs. Scho1nick's
_ appeal from the Service decision finding her deportable, and the order
of deportation became final on October 27, 1952. Meantime, Mrs. Scholnick
was convicted of conspiracy to violate the Smith Act January 21, 1953
1?
by a New York Federal Jury. She served a sentence of one year and a_-q
day in prison and was fined $2,000.
in connection with the deportation, Comissioner Swing said:
llThis is another example of the concentrated effort being exerted
__ _ y the Immigration and Naturalization Service to rid the country of all
1.:liens who accepted our hospitality and then became a part of thepr:_- ---172"/~' - Communist conspiracy against the free world." / -~' J. ~
._,_-- .-v
rK'RaCORDED
15 pa 1-£1255
. =/-'7/, --' ""
b BDEC ib'|B5b
-|-- -*-;----- .._ _- _., ., f ,_lorl L
1
e. ,.._.lCL I-.:nli-'-iiq_--»q=-
u -_='_, ,,ir_- _.-_.L
-."
-s-:=.'.: rq.
¥§$§
I I .»-Io--I
§¥F_ E5
§_
;__._--
Fl ' .
_ ii--"!.<
:»"-_ 3,1Z-d
.';_¢.i...f :'.J.".£;'=.-11
v '_ .'.' . ¥-'."..92 '.-.~-_- -; . --.., - .-1,. ,_'» -.__v! ., 7_f.- _ l is 7|=-_-yr,-QF; -.-1!;';92_;_'-_-__»". _'rr*~',.*~.». -fyjv.-; .";-_
4;
1 "-~_
._.ma nasnim.-s mzn
nanny, Dreams 9, 1955. kw.
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Immigration Commissioner Joseph M. Swing announced the deportation
today of Claudia Scholnick, alias Claudia Jones, a British subject, on
s warrant charging that she was active in Communist Party affairs after
her entry into the United States.
Ms. Scholnick
Elizabeth" from New
Ms. Scholnick
21, 1915. She lastdeparted for England today aboard the "Queen
York.
was born in Trinidad, Bitish West Indies, February
entered the United States at New York, February 9,
192k, as an immigrant.
A warrant was issued for her arrest on October 27, 19h? under
applicable immigration laws making membership in the Communist Party
a ground for deportation.
The Board of Imigration Appeals dismissed Mrs. Scholnick's
appeal from the Service decision finding her deportable, and the order
of deportation became final on Uctober 27, 1952. Meantime, Mrs. Scholnick
was convicted of conspiracy to violate the Smith Act January 21, 1953
by a New York Federal Jury. She served a sentence of one year and a
day in prison and was fined $2,000.
In connection with the deportation, Commissioner Swing said:
IIThis is another example of the concentrated effort being exerted
by the Immigration and Naturalization Service to rid the country of all
aliens who accepted
Communist conspiracy against the free world." Iour hospitality and then became a part of the
A-.Lmuma1|nn cum S
1. :8 u:n.92ss92r92£n{1p,1'£J;i-;i'i1_BY£i§1IA<>
- _~¬'-.w92-F$1~-1_i -.,__.__..__.._._.._ .-_..._ i__._ __ we
- -
a_f_- =3
-.,--.-._
-
, -. ;.
.92* #-
. F
.- ;-,
4
-
I lk
--1 .
§-3 .;..
:."
.:r§'
§
r '.'_".?_:' j__.',E. Ln-r -r.-1n1 ;, '
92 ;'-1],!--3,1;f-.j~.'{;f ,2 . .-:3!
'
at.¢ .-.. r._,.
'4'! ._
-1
92._ _.
S.
4-
3...
., ' 5
-' Q
-.
.1- Q 92 y _-PDQ?-$' -' M . Tr1=o ii. 92 /a > .e;_R2;-3.11 ti. m;;,___i
92 osrdma92 FEDERAL O #.n0nt__.._. 12§OI'li.
M H
. . '-;='_ _ ,|- __ _ Q--q,--qr;----. *unxrsn srnwss nap T or JU rxcs '- ~ ---
' M1. Parsons ._,__*~92 1- -~ - Mr. Rosen _."_ I
Mr. Tamm ____
F Mr. l92' a=e ..__
_' " ' Mr. Wint.errowd_. - /._Transmit thellowing Teletype message to: BUREAU Tm R°°m"--I
92; .' I-~ '
Mr. Ho1loman__
Nile Gandy_.¬cmnnm vssa scsozmcx, uas., IS c, sa no.
Subject, under name CLAUDIAQgONES, dep ted US this
date at 2:00 p.m. voluntarily, under warrant of eportation.
IZ B ' Subject occupied Cabin Blh0 aboard QUEEN EL A ETH, her }
destination was Great Britain. Numerous
bid bon voyage. Su5]ecE occupied cabin _
who is traveling on a US passport and
subject. Subject traveli on emergency tra issued by British Consul on 11/23§55. World Travel Agency,'NYC, ""'
booked passage for both subject and Mrs. EDELMAN. Subject
last seen alone in her cabin with Hrs. EDELMAN at 1:20 p.m.
and was not observed to leave ship after this time. -
mtmr p c,
I
_ 92,,§_£_8.*l°l- M Belmont I on;
L3: :3 ' '- § _ //;/
.0
3-BUREAU 00-72 9o! n1~1! . __92_.f_.;_;__A1-M i" S1 we/, , 72: /S /?
,7 .[O L RECORDED - A 1955
mums -4 ~ ~-
~ rtY< "118
ca PApprovedzw H _4g
v!* . ; K ent N Per_____J ial Agent in e " '92-,.sc
muaozn-I .;»,._ /vow 7.2.170-/Q0 »gig H/K? 1-W-s» 8% " ""' "'
~"-1- .v-_.-in .¢-" -. ..,._ _____ _
,_,_._.i2 yellows ' -1c- Hr. Board.mar;/-.1 ontrM l 92. E vb
an cuunxnagé;-scnowxcx, nu nieeee 11'??? A
' _ -,-. V . 92. ,
Reference is node to the Ilfli d-std - »
Iovelber 28, 1955. which furnished information scnerning 92
Clsudis Vere Schoiniok, better known ss Cisudis Jones, who y
was scheduled to Dc deported to London, England, on 1 1December 9, 1955. K;
for your further intonation in this connection,
Clsudis Jones tslunterily departed the United States ct *1
2:00 P.I. en December 9, 1955, under srsrrcnfct deportation.She occupied Osbin BNO aboard the Queen l1i|:cbeth." Ier *
- destination no Ilrest Iriteic. ,B:ere were numerous trio
on head to bid her hon voyage-
Clcucic lone! occupied n osiin sith Iildred Idellq
who is traveling on s U. S. .psssport and is cppcrentiy i
friend or the sob,1ect. Clsudis Jones is trsveiing on on
emergency travel permit iceued by the British Gonsul en
Iovber 29, 1955. The orid Trove} Agency, low York City
booked passage for both Clsudis Jones and Irs. Ideisan.
Cisudis Iona was observed in her cabin with
lire. ideinn st 1:20 Ll. on December 9, 1955, sod uss__nct
observed to lesvc the ship sf?-or .»,:"~
" !iT',L;'-*1 ='.- is-Iil='~-'-i-Je .'=,;<;*- - $15:-.~' 2~;H'WH':'£.n"iI:'lréE L U '
2cc - London sscmzr am comma '
cc - Foreign Liaison Unit -1ET Classied by #358b§ _ o E-92_-.' {Qt-31:51-*2§!'§.= M: Oflfi 1 "° '
""'!"r"§*--.-or.-, ,._.. W1, . _ _Tolson ,_____ __ - -:{_,92->3 92 :__ 2 ., -gmpdmn ____ ~i,:92~ 921 in _ ' - .nknwn ..~,_92_92',J Y 5.,..,.,. _f X , $56 .HI!->0 _i_f r fn , __Mut1r__i_,..... Y1-C if-"-' H ,.' .- '.¬:_'~ 3P suns I Y L Q I W q
URcsrn ___i..___ C -. ";+ ""3 _,Ti|nrr- __ __J_. _ -3 _- J - J7Si21w___W__ H . -~-»-92_,92,92 _ r_ AlaIimzm92e:d.__ "-1. '1 ' _-<'.'-;_'_";¢'~ -I Y-_' ,[elr.|¬u-om _.__ - _ I " __.r"'f-I F K £lO]n|$IlI'-all _,__ - . r -if I ' pm HR -r
475E! ,-T-T9!
B
I]
Z]
1l__J
Z]XXXXXX
XXXXXX
XXXXXX
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
FOIPA DELETED PAGE INFORMATION SHEET
Pagctsl withhcld entirvlv at this location in thc filc. U110 or more of thc I'ollowi11g SIAiI.Cl'I1LI1I!-1 wherc
indicated. e=x[1lai11 this deletion.
[lct0d u11 l¬'I' oxc-n1pt.io11 .<~! ,1 _,_,__,____ _____ _ _ c,__, with no scgregahlc
material available for I' l _!8.'.:>0 to you.
l11I'or111ut.ion pcrtaiiwd onlv to a third party with no rcfcrcnce to you or the subject of' your request.
l11fo1'n1at.ion pcruliiicd only to a third }!tH'I92. Your llanic is listed in the titlc only.
Documcntisl originating with thc following go92'er11n1o11t ag0nc'_92" ies! ____,,__A,,M.,,. . d___.._
_ .. ..... __ , was/were forwarder] to thcrn for direct rcspo11sc to vou.
Pagclst refcncd for consultation to the foIlowi11g go92*ern111e11t agcricvties-1!; I~ ..
____ Nu _, _ WW as the infor11111tio11 originated with them. You will
he advised r1f'availal>ilit92' upon return of the material to thc FBI.
Pagutsl withhold for thc following rcasonls!:
For your information. _ _ _ _ _____
lz/The following numhcr is to hc uz-ed for rcfercncc regarding thes£> pages:
XXXXXX
XXXXXX%7§>_@:_1 iiftt u_ __ m
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxg§ DELETEDIHMHQS1 §
4-750 -T-T9!
2-l
I3
C]
*1.__1
;"|
l__4
[1
2/
XXXXXX
XXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXX
XXXXXX
FEDERAL BUBEQU OF INVESTIGMTION
FOIPA DELETED PAGE INFORMATION SHEET
Puget:-=! withheld entirelx at this location in the file. Um or more of the following st,atemont:<., whore
indieated. explain this dc*l *lio11.
l!el0t1;'d under oxcnipti<mt.~il 7 b_l_TLl_? ¢'f_________ do ___ with no segregal>l<:
m aterial available for release to you.
l:ifomiotit_n1 pertained unlv to a third party with no rtaforenc-e to you or the suhjoct 0l' your request.
lriformutiori pertained oulx to a third partx. Your name is listed in the title onlv.
D !CU1 I1llhl originating with the followimzz government 8g0n [vli0Sl 7 é¢:;_44,I_u .
T if __.o o__ .was/were forwarded to the-m for direct response to vou.
Pageis! I'0l'GI'1"9tfl for consultation to the fitilltiwing gtwrernmenl ag@nCylieS!;
,o-_ _F o__ WW W as the information origirlawd Witll thorn. You Will
he adviaed of availability upon 1'et.nrn of the niaterial to the FBI.
Pagelsl withheld for the f'ollo9292"ing rear-=on'.=;!:
For _92 ]t]Tllllt!l"l'l lE1[l ]I]1 ____________ ________ _ ___
The following number is to be uaed for I'CfL!'{fI [ regarding these pages:
J00 '@-E5 Z0 -L/I? _t /=1 '~1:";' it e _
.. - _A~*-1- ~~ 1 -ii
FEDERAL BUREAU OF I TIGATIOHJ
lQ.'§>bun.__--
Hr. Niebele..._-
Mr. Boa
M1. Belmon
Mg, Hason__--~
Mr. Bohr..---
Hr mse no
Classied em I2 __Exempt From 5 mm Q vv"M
' Date of ueclassr 1mm, its
. 55?'92 W 12/21/ M
Transmit th £0110 ng Teletype message to B EAU. Parsons...-
Mr. Roee.n...-.-
Mr. Te.mm...---
r. Neese...._-
Mr. Winter:-o'IL
Tale. Room __--
Mr. Hwll:m1an_-
1-! G ml!
cuurnn JONES, IS c, SA-14.0 B . I Q mm I-L 4*» -S3
Be G1_:_iea2o let to Direci=or- 12,/i3y'55_92l./Q1;] I -
_
The "Daily Worker , 10/31/S5, page S, column 5
tained an article captioned "Claudia Jones Needs Uninterrupted;
t This article stated, "The National Committee to Defend L1-'
Negro Leadership urges that during Miss GLAUDIE JONES' hospi~ta1- '
ization in Mt Sinai there be no visitors in order that Miss -- >.,
JONES will have an undisturbed period for maximum rest and quiet ?'
required to ease her heart condition.
, . I
On 11/ll;/S5 subject's deportation was stayed on a " _I=_4O/
day-to-day basis, providing she submitted to having a deposition +taken in regard to the defendants in the US vs. rnacswsnssnel #3
case. Subject never submitted to having deposition taken and _
afte r this her attorneys stated she would agree to
de rtation to the United Kingdom on or pri
to 12/9/55 on the s tion INS would refrain from further
dep or tati on eff or ts .:4
-- F.
-:-mr
_.,...'i' ;-;
arr?
.
..i;;i5 "
_;_
1?.
i-"1-Qi '
.1
. _{_.
- 1
vi! V '
2 92 .
,1: ' I
ea
---,1_ -...,.92;r__v
4;.Hi
Q: ,4
..--1".
:1-f_;
' I c
;___. _ 3; . _
_-1;-1'-92'I.-"s.'|§§-'~';'
-;._4.__,?.LL,., .:|
'9-#1:? 7-- k
,_ 1wva
1
- '.
i'92l;~*-
I 1 1 I
1 ' h . 0 '
92. UFEDERAL sunset oF__1nvEs'rIoA'r1on
w 'rr:_ -Pig:we st-Qaa;vaAmmALw=TI¢=I'D-ll
NY 100-18676 -2-
'1" arias V
ranemit the following Teletype message to:
On ll/114/55 subject was burning some her papers
in her apt._when the Fire Dept. was called. When firemenarrived she refused to let them in. Entrance was gain d b 4the firemen through a window. According to Patrclmanib Q
NYC PD, who also responded to the fire alarm, subject was
burning papers in her stove, fireplace, and in the bathroom.
Firemen took all material subject was burning and put it in
two trash cans which were later examined by agents. The
material was all charred to such extent that identificatio -of individual articles among this material was imposeib1e.K|.A..!
ii;
I
i P
b KJ: 92-.
__ p T9292_ _ _ _ I 5 92 __;;;~:;~_<-.__ ,-_ -4-Q1" 1__-_:J|inln rte-0 ___.
4-759 -7-79!
XXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXX
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
FOIFA DELETED PAGE INFORMATION SHEET
.._..___ Page s! withheld entirely at this location in the file. One or more of the following statements, where
indicated, explain this deletion.
blZKDelewd under exemption s! I _ _ ___ with no segregable
material available for release to you.
l-.:l information pertained only toa third party with no reference to you or the subject of your request.
l:l Information pertained only to a third party. Your name is listed in the title only.
l:l Document sl originating with the following govemment agency ies! ___
_ _ W i , was/were forwarded to them for direct response to you.
-i- Page s! referred for consultation to the following government agency iesl; _______i_
__ as the inforrnation originated with them. You will
be advised of availability upon return of the material to the FBI.
i__... Page s! withheld for the following 1eason s!:
l:| For your information: , __ _ _ _ _
lg/The following number is to be used for reference regarding these pages:
log» 425910 - 1' -.9»
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxX DELETED PAGE S! §§No DUPLICATION FEE X
XXXXXX X FOR THIS PAGE X
XXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXX
FBI/DOJ
4-750 -7-79l
J
Cl
Q
l:l
ElXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXX
FEOEIML Bl.IIiElU OF INVESTIGATION
FOIPA OELETED PAGE INFORMATION SHEET
Pagelsl withheld entirely at this location in the le. One or more of the following statements, where
indicated, explain this deletion.
Deleted under exemptionlsl bl Ibq L with no segregable
material available for release to you.
lnfonnation pertained only to'a third party with no reference to you or the subject of your request.
V...-. ...,....,. :r92 1:,.+...-I :_. 4'1.-. us]- .._1..J.lJLll IICIIHU lb 11bM:,'l.l lll LIIC LILIU Ullly.
Documenttsl originating with the following government agency/ ies!
_. _ _ _ , was/were forwarded to them for direct response to you.
Page s! referred for consultation to the following govemment agencyliesl; _.mmm.__....o_..crawa
.._____.. . . _ _ . as the information originated with them. You will
be advised of availability upon return of the material to the FBl_
Page s! withheld for the following reason s!:
_.._:- .7.,--. .-A. .-.92~92'.L92-14' wi-'- 92_" .1.11----- ----4....-.-....__ __
au|nunIIann.ll "1 _ - ;:_,_
0
n
Q 1 t .12 _&..e;Z¬.2@92 h!
3'r'**~--1-.___ 1* M __d. IQ 2.4,/Ojfé Mkis - - UNITED su sovznmmm
non = sac, nnw YORK 00-18676!1'0 = nmncron, FBI 00-72390! barn; 12/29/SSK gm-|_u-Qty Index card cancelled
SUBJECT: CLAUDIA VEI-A05CHOI2lI.CK,' nae _ _e _ lIS - c , - '67-
. SMITH CT OP " .'_?f.-_. ' ___f,. ',j__:
- _ .-.. -.. , . _" 92-_. : A 9*. J1' IE !:?_:_14_. ...--, ,_;_" ~?--[
' Subject voluntarily departed U S. under warrant of *' 7
_ 92
BANBELLEB to
' JAN 9 1956
®- Bureau 00-'!2390! RM! 2
PH1 - HY 100-18676 3 _-' '
_ 113* t ,92 IF!-ED $ R . - 92-:1-'-'1 " " :W t §W*= A
k F _a _
efpy1, -..mg am?-*%~3 L "deportationeboard "HMS queen Elizabeth" on 12/9155.
It 1e therefore recommended that eubjeot should be
deleted from the security Index of the H0 and the Bureau.1' _' 4 . _.,.
-Q.
C-'
.1
F-'.4
,1
F I ' wb$~'392 -: ='* ~ I17} < Q92"*:.z;%'{'<.xi*92 .5 u 4 -5'1?-{ 3- 92-*uA1£1J+"//*4 V
. J _ asc0R0E?92',¢,
<5Q Q,;¢§T3 19:»25 JAN:-~92--
'3
_.
n""'L
J
4-750 -7-79!
5
s/
Cl
U
D
Cl
l%Ihe following number is to
XXXXXX
XXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXX
XXXXXX
FEDEBM. BIJIIEMI OF INVESTIGATION
FDIPA DELETED PAGE INFBIIIMTION SHEET
Page s! withheld entirely at this location in the le. One or more of the following statements, where
indicated, explain this deletion.
Deleted under exemption s! _i T _ __ with no segregable
material available for release to you.
Information pertained only to'a third party with no reference to you or the subject of your request.
Information pertained only to a third party. Your name is listed in the title only.
Document s! originating with the following government agency ies! __ __ _
T __,_ T i, _ , was/were forwarded to them for direct response to you.
Pge Sl referred for consultation to the following govemment agencyes!; as
__ , , __ _ as the information originated with them. You will
be advised of availability upon return of the material to the FBI.
Page s! withheld for the following reason s!:
For your information: _ _
d for reference regarding these pages:
inn/I;1_3,692n .- -IV V .| v av W 7
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
§ DELETED PAGE S! §
X no DUPLICATION FEE X
X FOR THIS PAGE X
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
; J-
-p-.
_. A
v-_
5? -7
1 _
1 ,-'
, -. ,
0.,
4 ll-51- 3A .
I5
o
-1
W
-'5'
s
I.
¢ _
'»
1, l :1.. .-,--
'-'f£_ -._
I92_}_H_
ta"-T--..3--'.~.=
92".-1" .- 1
._-L .9.-Q --_ *;-'11-'92r£i'E
,-_'/
:2
-i !! 92-._. ..__ A. _ _ -. ._ J.» ,....._...-_......__...,..-____._... _7 ., 4
_ __ ___ .______,__,.___-7-A.-.'-_ .::--Q-11- - 5- p 1-LI--41-_ 4j' -,V ' -__ --
drunnllonwnlwanOiti Memokndum - UNITED srgs eovsnnmsnr
-m , Director, FBI 00-7239<£UYl92H:L92&_i92ALbAn= 1/13/56
M = sac, Pittsburgh 00-9070! I___
6/mp *%A w or 191:0 //2J! 0 0 mmwi 5 '
Re New York airtel, 12/21/55, gem-$5353 on; -;'_j,!';17, - It"
0.5W On January M, 1956,
; Fed - women, Alderson, H. Va., advise 1,,
SA that no psychiatric examination was ¢=B'Il92
given the subject wh e she was confined at the reformatcry,
j, although a number of extensive medical examina-'» tions. de available the medical reports con-
cerning subject and stated that she was quite certain that
all medical examinations, complaints by subject, and medical
treatment w cerated were riled therein. A..review ofj same by S evealed no information was contained We F51!
therein regarding subject: mental status except for the statement that she was considered to have average intelligence and there was nothing in the file which would indicate .that V
- . e Isubject's mental stability had been questioned. '_
stated that almost without exception she is advi " . - .'
92 mental stability oi any inmate becomes questionable, and she --I cannot recall anything which would reflect on subject: .1¢ mental stability. RUG. 51¢. -tbb FEW M
,,-7 eau - ! ?Mo ' AM Z2 -iniiniiiiiitz E "- .21 2 CLAUD JQNE$! 34 ALLINFORII.-ATION CUNTA1 . Q1 - New York 00-i8676, CLAUDIA Jonas} mm5 °1=95"m ' 1
1 - PG 100-9070 _ e, _ axcs?rv:z-mszssovm .
o-';:rw1s:
@ !
f" Q
fl Ewen _ U ZL<>:_7.=%5_.1L<2 / 75
1} 1556
* -_- '_-,/ CV - ' L@_¢,j792* 92 VJ
s '
Tollon ¬_.._ h
Bmrdman _____
Rachel: _i._
Belmont ..__
lilbo ii.
Peraoea._._
I.eaen.__i
'l'um__.__
5 it
$65
Ho 0c-=.a;'% N Q ['4 amrpLegal Attache, Iondon
Director, FBI O0-72390R1 RDED 11 /2 2,/520-22>
J 1
rqilanuary It, 1956, enclosingEl from the lien York Office
the captioned individual.
Ior your additio
there ie attached herewith
from the Pittaburgh Office
relate: to the queation of
she wee incarcerated at the Federal Refomatory for Iomen atAldereon, eet Virginia. D rwe ! W QJ
2cc - New York For Information!v d
- Foreign Liaison Unit route éhr for review!
DE.-mssxrmb BY-¥i ---""' '...wJ1-§~
IL;
LEGAT
2 JAN 2 0
COMM-FBIU 41 I-/' 1;,-.1, iv-no - 1113- L4"
January 19, 1956
UDIA J RES,ii I ea |....-. -
IITQIIL QBCURITY -
Ilererence ie nade to Bureau nenorandun dated
a copy of an airtel received L
ted December 21, 1955, concerning
'-J_ oxipation in thin connectiona 6'6 '~~Bi'ra memorandum received "
dated January 13, 1955, Uhioh
aub,1ect'a mental atability while
Classified { '9 5
Exempt Fro DS Category ,
Date of Decl ication - Indefinite.
J*r.1:»; -
.- /
5,70
4-750 -'7-79!
XXXXXX
XXXXXX
XXXXXX
FEDERAL BUIIEMI DF INVESTIGATION
FDIPA DELETED PlGE INFORMATION SHEET
Page sl withheld entirely at this location in the le. One or more of the following statements, where
indicated, explain this deletion.
[Z/Deleted under exemption s! L i,_ _ __ _ with no segregable
Cl
E
[Il
El
Q
XXXXXX92I92I927IP92T927
zuuuuus
XXXXXXmaterial available for release to you.
lnformation pertained only to'a third party with no reference to you or the subject of your request.
Information pertained only to a third party. Your name is listed. in the title only.
Document s! originating with the following government agency ies!
, was/were forwarded to them for direct response to you.
Page s! referred for consultation to the following government agencyes!; ________e_mae_e__i#+
or E _ as the information originated with them. You will
be advised of availability upon return of the material to the FBI.
Page s! withheld for the following reason s!:
For your information: _ _ _
The following number is to be used for reference regarding these pages:
we-'I.>3lD - Ht, is g
t {§XlKJ'!4» Té
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
§ DELETED PAGE S! §
X NO DUPLICATION FEE
Fog THIS PAGEUUVVUVVVXI XV?AAAAAAAAAXAA
4 - -1' !
hurt Fora
FDJ65 If:-12-551I-i Q. 4.~92-4.,»-_._ ¢;..a-»4n~.-.-._¢'--_,- _.-..-4-1--v-..;.,,,, -5-._,¢. ___ _
0 ' 3' "'-92.U_ -
r FEDERAL BUREAU OF |NVE§T|GA'|'|°N /
loportlng Effie: i Offll Gf Ofllln 1 "" 4*! llvolttgnllvo i§r1|d ii
my In mu WEB 3 Q55 1/5,0,9 13.19.20/ss _ Y
mu or cu:
92~ .
/ CLAUDIA VERA SCBOLIIGI, In "' ' IITHIILL SIGURITI G
,>- IIIPH LOT 1911.00 Rat upon I56: by t,,,
b
cmmmn or cu:
iinopsltz
£.=as "ad bv 54°-K-517
§EC§a5£ r 0: 0!-BR
Q as.-'0 i M1 '° N
TE FDRW smed by u 1 gc92nd6 92 m
no on mp; Fr m .4
D5 jy
77'°"¢ .v;:13g.::'m' i Dc n t Iriu ln lpl¢:I hello! K
Copiau nude: @::;::-=1; 21., M M 71 W
1-van, sun nu! """"""'-I"
3-Now York 00 13675! Q. FEB
'-.9 E111.",:'1-- ;__=r.92~- - -
. ;-.
* "-'1s _ ,.._._ 1-.-.- 4.; ___.:- .1---~ ' _-- Q - - 4-l_**".I> _-_ F'92- -: ayi-__.Aru-_4
. Q
sz mo-10010-7 S; A, "
, "- -" w "Q o'- -2 I
| __ .§lILI! * , ,'7 @ ~' { i _ 1'
K 1. I . _ - I-, _; -.7 j j _, I atgeeidenge ~. . -c - . - -9- ~. _ I ' . --.
Hlc 0n'0ctober :1 1955 Imited O O
Statee Probation Officer, Southern District or-Iew Ibrk,
advised that reecrds reflect subject etated that apcn - -
her reloaie froi tho Federal ieioriatori for Hoiin, alder-eon, lest Virginia, on October 23, lQS5, ahe would return
to the home ct her tather 50hHeat lhjrd Street, law Iork Ei%;, until Inch time ac aha .
could eecure her can place of residence. , . ,:_ - ' - r ~r 1_
Information received that It. Sinai Hoapital,
l00th Street and 5th lrenue, Iew Iork Oity, retleate
eubjeot occupied private room 369 at thie hospital from
Qctobcr 2%, 1955 to Hcrcnbcr 9, 1955,
Bis of the FBI observed the subject aboard the
QUEEI ELIZABETH prio to ite departure for reat Britain
on December 9, l lbjeot ocaupied'0abin Slh along ,l
with Hrs. HELD , uhouas traveling en a United
Statee paecpor t Subject Iae traveling en an emergency,Ttrggel permit is ued by the Bitieh Oensul on Iovember l9<_,-~ -
MILDRED , prior to her narriage in l95h,92
wae known as HELD cADOR!. . .
In an article entitled, '!ildred Ibldorz'e Ion
Stephen Dies ihich appeared in the Daily Iorter isane ot Ht; t, l95l, section l, ego S, column 3, HLDRID .
l!clDOR! wee deacribed as a well known Ooassunist leader -'
in Harlan. -
' ' Ihe Daily Iorker' is an East Ooaet Communist
daily newspaper. . S
the Daily Icrker' or December 23, 1955» Plse 2,
column l, contains an article captioned, 'Bitains Welcome
Claudia Jonee. Thin article reade in part ae follower
sebasr
.91-'._1£ Ab-. '.:-_ I";-. .- ____Qr,,e- - .
- 7-; '- -"J1:_- _5. n_ lulu _. ._
» j; >
i.,- h i - . .-. M
- -'|.h"":" ;._- e;-"92er*'=_'.~...m_ -.1_ 7. " - '
H .' H,» 92 -- -. ., 41
Southampton, Ingland - Claudia Jonee,"*faaoue woman leader of the GP of the UB1, nut 31 Fc stepped aahore here laet week, Juet one t' i¥
" '1 ' '9"-:4;-'9 "lore great fighter deported from the United [g=j'~--
Btatee under the Halter-Hoarran Act. But-
ehe etepped into the arue of friende -b~ *-'
Johnny and Hay Iilliamaon, deported under
the can: act earlier this year == and a
group of Southampton women with a huge
bouquet...
Of her plane for the future Claudia
aaid: Fell, T an a champion weaver and an _
a journaliet...but firat of all I lean to
have a good holiday and reet."
1 .
,_ cl- _ -_. -
Judicial Action '
Aeeietant United States Attorney ROBERT K. RUB-
KIN, Southern District of New York, advieed he received a
stipulation on Scptaabcrtl3, 1%55. iigncd hy H33! H. - -~
KAUFMAN, Attorney of Record for the 11=FL!HI Oaee appellante
which includea eubject!, withdrawing appeal fron~United,States Diatrict Judge nnunnn J. n1nocx'a denial of notion o;§f§
for new trial and notion for reargunent cf the_notion for
new trial; etipulation filed September 13, 1955. United
Staten Dietrict Court, Southern Dietrict of Iew Iork.
The "Daily Iorker' of October lz, 1955, page Z, _eolunn l, puhliahed on article entitled, ' ZQQQ leeded n - R
Por Release of Claudia Jonee.' this article wae an appeal
for funds to pay eubJeot'e fine impceed u on her by convic-tion for violation cf the Smith act of 19KB. ~ ' » o
. _.,¥
"-Y Qt-'£_-; '. i-fl
._.__ .1
~li¢1*7I
H no
J,
I--_ J:1..al_ .._a__.. _..nn-..-an...--L .§.'.: u-':__ 4§...,..s».;a... pi-ll-.-h-.-B-'..|.-_._..__.,,,,_,_ _.__.._.._.__- _
1 g 1
O
IY 100-lB6f6
. ._'_
Claudia iones yesterday wen a eta; ct depor-
nation pending determination or the status at *92
SE ET
Ihis article read in part as fellows: _;
._.,,._ , _ ,.,,. ,e_~ - ~~ *7 on = *-92'}92%__%%{.,.
her health. nihe action came as a United Btates
District Court Judge in Uaahingten signed a tal-
porary restraining order which prevents the 8ua- _
tics Department tron carrying out lies Jones
scheduled deportation Sunday, when aha =il1.%e
released from llderson Prison. lies Jones
will as a result be tree Sunday on #100 bend.
She will arrive Honda; morning in Iev'!crk.9 .
_ <. -
Recer_ds Clerk, Federalis-
fornatory for Ubnen, dldereon, Heat Virginia, advised on
October 23, 1955. that
on enhjeet end ehe92!ee
iltla
a ~ On Iovelher
§='=%.°'51=2=..I*'§» ."§!'§IE8 withdrew deportation warrantreleeeed £ren.prieen et ? 49!. that
aed BA t sub-
3eet's nearing was neid this cats it unites ntii *Biitriit
Court, Iaahington, 3.0., In ge A. l_ siding; g;sub eet was re resented h attorne s D1 II or Y J 9 I I ,Washington, n.c., and emu: awn oi law o 01:1. 11
8nb;eot's nedical doctor, 8 _ ELSTIR, testified at
hearing that subject was then a patfbnt at Ht. Sinai Hospi-
tal, Iew York Oity, at his direction, and stated subject's
present heart condition would allow her to travel. '-
' Hr. GERHAE added that IE5 doctor: nho hare e:=
anined subject concurred with Dr. ILBTER'8 opinion in
regard to subject's present heart condition allowing her
to travel; and that doctors also agreed there is a question
of proper treatment tor subject's heart condition which
should be decided upon before the suhject is deported.a
Hr. GERMAN stated Judge TAHH agreed that the court restraining
order prohibiting INS from taking action to deport subject
to be extended to no later than November 9, 1955, with the
nrovinion that enhjeet rennin et Ht. ginei Eoapital tor I-wv_---.. vi-v
examination to determine proper treatment.
: 92. '7-
~IQ . I -0 9292..1 _I"92
i, '
"r,7§.'- E-'»"V";__=.".' ; ~ ~:is
*
~
' 2H
' c-54¢,
I
92
1 ; U
D SE ET
1:100-16676 D . D ,
~' Ihe 'Dsil1 Ibrker' of Iovenber h,-1955» Pl8e 4_3, column 1, contained an article, "Ask Stay_For Eigndiqu h,@_._|_gpe-e Testify at Slith not Irish" J Ihis artie -1.; ~*
i 92
92 ' 2Southern District o ew York, on heha1!.o£ IIQB&8___~/I
B _ Ind ALEXANDER RAGHTEIBERG by Attorney»!iH! ' "rerleo s that a petition as riled in Federal District "
O'seeking a depcrtet:2§92sta1 for subject so that, ~
e light testify as an expert witness in their Blith '
ict trial. 92 ' " " _' Z.'
GHABHEI and TBAGHTEIBEBG are defendants in the
pending Smith Act trial before the United States District
Court, Southern District of New York, entitled U8 vs_ALIXAIDER TRAGHTRIBIRG, IT AL._ . " 1:
Records or the United States District
Southern District or New Iork, as checked by SI
ion Hotinhcr 9, 1-355» reflected that on I6'iii-rail-,, !§§!, United States District Judge JOHI F. I. IBGOEEY
issued an order to show cause why an order should not he ,e
issued restraining District Director of II3 tron departing
subject pending disposition or a complaint tiled sane date
by subject alleging that order and warrant or deportation
are now void and illegal in that the statutory provisions '
upon which they are based are a denial to the subject st ;
substantive due process of law in violation of her rights
end privileges under the Sth ieendnenti Heering on this I
order to show cause was scheduled for Iovenber l0, 1955- l
»
On Nov Z H. GEBMAI, Central Office,
IIB, advised SA that on this date Ju e c48
EDWARD A. TAMI, e a es rict Court, Washington,
D.C., revoked the restraining order preventing IE8 action
1-fr -lrfgié
:I ;' ___|
i
;; .-=1
:r*.*-_§eU- -_.- J-. __.-_,-_- -.1. -.--_- _-.--_..;->. . _,,,__.,;_44|,i_-_...__i__ _.4_
L; U
t $E5E*ETI! 100-15675 * o*" °'"*a_»"-Y "o '0
_ - ' . ' ' -. a -' - '
:5 for purposes of having depoaition taken from edbjeott -_; c
Stay wee to laet until depoeition Ian eoleted. " -
., -. - - " - - 92. I . .1 _ .,*§"»* * ' deeietent Ehited Qtetee Attorney niacin :i5Y,**5?f
Southern Dietrict of Iew York,-advieed on Ioveiber 17, .
1955, that turther action tron edlplaint charging depor- ~
tation unconstitutional and ordered to ahow eauae ei dby United ltatee District Judge I600!!! en Iovenber K. 92 '
1955, iii to he diecontinued under atipuiation that .
subject would voluntarily accept deportation to the
United Kingdom on or prior to December 9, 1955. It III
further etipulated in agreement that eubject would *"§ *
initiate no_further litigation to lzag or halt her i .deportation. IIS agreed to retrain tron further depor- .
tation ettorte unti Docember 9, 1955. . .
IDHARD J. SHAUGEIESSI, Dietriet Director, IIB,
79 Gelnnbue Avenue, Eee Ierk Gity, edeieed e; letter
dated December 12, 1955; that aubject departed voluntarily
under warrant of deportation on board the 88 QUEEN IBIZA-
IBTH, which sailed from the Port or let Ibrk on Deceber "
9, 1955, deetinad tor lngland.- k _ -- K 92
q Gonmuniet Part; {OP} Qotivigl '. » ;,;Fz' *_ 1?§'"~ .'
£u1Y1*
h-jay
/
' The ICL haa been designated by the attorney Agsggal or the United Btatee purauant to Izecutive Order 7
, _ 92
.
5i##r; |
92_1, Q. -.92. -74:-. 1.--..<4.aun-4-.92=&-li.92.Q-air-.92mn-nn_||--_nn.;sq|i~ an-.--_- ~-m.-._:_-_-:r- -l, l- --- " 4-Q--n'#4'h:tln-1-.._. __4-.4-i-..
~ - E; J
M SECET-."" %
I! 100-15515, ."*"* »' V ' - j- A A " =*~'?¢fj>#Y?
. _ __ __,_. VI ,- J, _- ' __ -, I _ -.- A- L,_ - . . _ _
rho -T888 has been dn_1gn.nted by tho lttornoy _sigrdi at the United Stat pursuant f-o_I_:l0eut1v0 0:40! _f._'*'__.;,u _1 00 A ~ - , é ' 1
GP Annotate A _ _
.-_. ,-_:_ =' ,. V . A ' A -V . , r-. 77 ' tho BRO has bun dnignatod pg the Mate:-nof " Jgogsal or the Unitocl ltntu pm-luant to Ixoautln -01-dor _0 . , _ - _ , . - -. - "I. d
L
A-~ sec ET1
3
P
/92/-_1
r_ '.
Bit ?
..¢ _--
..,. L
-4F- 1-
'"~.."-~ 92..L_92-.' ,-92. » . ......._...-5-n .--L21».-.-n-_¢-__..-¢_ .
A SIEPRET
I! 100-16676 V ' ~
n '
tho 10??! hao boon dolignotod by tho Attornoygzggal of tho Uhitod Statoa puropant to lzooutlvo Ordor
. . _ A .
Michigan odition or ttho brkor,' Iovobor20, 1955» Page 16, oolunn h, contains an artiolo captioned,"Soot: Aid Domocratio Rights in US: Auk Passport to Robooon.This artiolo rotlooto that a oontoronoo of unioniota andnumbers of tho Labor Party gathorod in Glaooow, Sootland, Ito dorond damooratio righto in tho Unltod Btatoo. Thia
oonroroneo oont greetings to OLAUDIA JONES. -
Tho Hbrkor' lo tho Sunday oditlon of tho DailyWorker." .
PMI b;lH1A'
W. .. ..._,. - .'...q_-....., -. ,,,_,,, .,,,,_.,-.,,.,.-~-Q, »,,w---» -_-- -an,--,---7- -_..__-,- --- -.-
ye Q
Hffvf
17"
F-.5 -; ihk.-:-' r _ ~.'._ .._-..,, -.. ~.._-..~_-. - ; ~ - ==-.§-n-w 7-
ch»
sec T
_
_92'
The newspaper Per A Lasting Peace, Ihr A reopies
Democracy!" uhich is-published in Bucharest, Hungary, and-
* describes itself as organ of the Intornation Bureau of
the onunist and Workers Parties, in its Becenber i, 1953,
issue, page h, contained an article captioned, In Defwnce
or Claudia Jones: Statement ct the Iational Oonsittee 6!
or the USA. The article read as rollers: -
, . 1A x
92 '1 nonth ago Claudia Jones, nenber of the
Iational Oonittee of the GP USA was released
tron Jail, after serving a sentence on a trunptdé
up charge of advocating the overthrow of the
government by force and ticl=ncc.' Broad ==c=
ticns or the progressive American public knov'
Claudia Jones as a tighter tor peace, as a true
daughter of the Iegro people, and a champion or
their rights, as a fighter or social progress
and against racism and all reactions. Despite "
the tact that her health has been ruined by
imprisonment and persecution, and that she is
now in the hospital, the Oevernnsnt of the U81 {-= =*
has decided to deport L92: Zhis nous angered -
all honest Americans." - '
.e
is
Q
1".
P"
he
J
§
1
4
E
T-Y
H- 92-
".". _'*.5'-5
1'
.-v; .-
.-
5.
dkéhs;'¢,'r-.';.== -"
-.¢ .-mfg@%%k=
<5 _,_.,.
f g
Jt+
3..
>-
*1
..
__ ._ _
$1"-
r'._'
1-2--
._.
_u- U ._ .
_-.e' _. -»-
Pi-ry
sf L? 6:31 - . ...__--t g.-. .-- -- -¢---e~»---ee~-_.-.-- - ...._1._,-b _._i T ,_;,-3-1-_4j-~* ____,; - ___
:
R
11 . T
I! 100-1367 - .
_ <.. . . V _ . ;» ' 4 -'|
.. L______'
I
Health Status
Ihe Daily Iorker' of October Z7; 1955; Plse 1,
eclunn 3, carried an artie1e.which retleeted subject 7
suffered a sudden attack yesterday afternoon and was taken
igaediataly to !t= éinai ospitai, 199th étreet aod 5th
lvenue, Iew York City» lies Jonee was described ee suffering
an attack or heart peine." The article further states
the subject had been scheduled to enter the hospital for a
run medical checkup on Friday October 26, 1955!. -
I The Daily Worker of October 31, 1955» Plie 5,
column 5, contained an article captioned, "Claudia Jones
Reade Uninterrupted Rest. This article states: _
La U
u L- '-"'
I
X H n 100-18676
l 5'? . T
-11-Ihe Ietionel Gonittee to Defend ~$* i
Iegro Leederehip urges that during the " Hperiod of Mile G1eud1;_Jonee'e hoepitel-' -*
izetion in Ht. Sinai, there be no v1eitore,i
in order thet Hie: Jonee I111 have en -
ngéietusbed perioa tor ::z1:"- ---* -- an rose III
quiet required to eeee her heart eond1t1on.' .1 -
"the Iorker' of April 3, 1955, Plse 13, eolnmn
reflects the HGDHL oontippee in exietenoe end 1! located
1660 Fulton Street, Erooklyn, Ieu Iorke
1--'=- r/9 !
923¢/
n_ -~ - Q 0
i
'|_I _ .en. _.. __
_ re» I
r;-oi. 9' ?~'° .
'-- _
. nation in regarde to euhject'e nental statue, except for "
-a V 1-;-
"»
Q4 - '. --f_-;}<.';-4--w-'1-1
1 . . - .-
F cl ?L?-v
a ' T ,I .
-ea-|
--e -.-e .
-=- .-"l .-.:- -,h3f _'-- -' A-' "Q-." ' vra, II:- ' Iawn I-mm: h. use. um mam h* sEc%-.'T
n1qo.1a5'_r6_ - h _a ,
_'"
. , , _ __.__. _ .. lie -: - ~ :_.. _ *-___--;__e_":I2;é:'___,, g~§ he "De.il1' Iorker" ea: Iovenber 21, 1955..-Pa{e"i*lf";l_1;"§% 1, column 3, contained an article captioned, Claudia, v__.Jogea gill Go '_lo I-endon; Iec Ill To Fight Deportatielkor r. _j_.- '_ -~ _ - . . V ' _ ..' _'._ _- =' :.'I *
was 3 ven a nun er 0 exteneive nedicalx examinations, but "-
no psychiatric examinations» Record: contained no intcr- »-
a atatement ahe nae ccneidered ct average intelligence. f,_
Hiacellaneoug ' A - .. -c - §
.,.&-nn - .59th 2;-eenie92'-.";'_1leir' lorh
8&8 and
1 , a on that ;
and reeponded to a tire-~*
, Iew or it!. According to --
when the ctticera arrived they learned"
, who vac burning papere in her apartment, -
rerueed to firemen tc enter her apartment. Firemen >
entered through a window and put cut the tire eubjeca 92in the fireplace, stove, and according to Patrolganke-_-92 . ,
.0e~-.!__ I.---;92,'
-1.-.'..,.--,_;
- 34" -'_=_.r» =- '..;__ .- s .1*. _._p.-.
:: ' _--.
I44
-1
c-- -
11'
.-
._ .¥.;§ 3.1.
J?»4 .
_,_-..q.
-i . '
.. ._
;/
"4
a--f"""~ .
.. 5:. X.-.- ._._ -. pr92_' §:=-1-.41- . I. --' _ -
*9 1...-1.-" _;».'.-......-:-1*"' 4i1.
7 4
:-
..--92_.-~ .|- .-_s.
1.~. --. -- - 7 _ wk .-_ . ~~* ~-;:J- ..-_-.- --i»--_s92sn-;-'I1_=_--_.:"*~~ -g-.5" ..__-,,Z,-_,_i_-_- __._._.==_.-_---_...._.__
- r SECRET{ n m-mm 1:. * '<=.;i=?'* L ',>w>r¢ mam . urmznaivrca, fothor . '_-"~"~ o -55-.o>~ 0 . widower . _ : .- - -. .-73$--""§g_.'}-..{ .5 *"""'-.- "§5Eo ugh: 1.b,3;-a Strut " :1 *-1~.*.-=A . New York. ow I -..-'-#:~;If.' Rsosivss o _ Q30 ssaistsnoo . " I V o" - -... .. - :-. .; - _,-3-i-.' ,_.____-- . ..._.- _- . ._., , .. _
mv ,cumama.~.'rca, sistor' o 'ml Host 120i:-httroot ' - * " - - Q
H I . Io ork How og] , 'Doaostio'wor sr '- . . ~.92 Ago kl - _ . . .' ' . mB1mcn,"i1stsr I --
- . Ago 37" - . .- .-92 ' jUi"'I3'§t ILl;3rd Strut r ' '~ " ,
*' How York, low York
Toaohor -
" - J . "'~'- ':-- ¢..I-orLIm& BAT, sistor
;_ 7, ggfégat 1'!3rd St:-oat. _ _,__.. _ New York, N_gn..3.or3_ . . Paotory worker -- . ~~; - _
-.1 _ - .. .~_-r '__ ,-' --v ~ I J I r H - ' " J+-" . "_ 21' #5 -'1 _. .- 5-*.- . 1;, . -- = ' " -r - - - - K .; - L ~*__ 5 8ubJoot's rsoord slso rotloots that whilo isif 1prison she took courses in shorthand and Spanilho
...c;.
; '-as * _ _ ... __ A_ I _ .
o .1 /o. kt - q _ -- _ ...I0o_,r[;3 . .
'1-_ r'-.' 1:-:; ;- .-i - ..- F1 .
-13-
4-750 -7-79!
XXXXXX
XXXXXX
XXXXXX
FEDERAL BUREAU DF INVESTIGATION
FDIPA DELETED PAGE INFORMATION SHEET
_____ Page s! withheld entirely at this location in the le. One or more of the following statements, where
indicated, explain this deletion.
LBf Deleted under exemption s! 1 b7& _ with no segregable
material available for release to you.
U lnfomiation pertained only toa third party with no reference to you or the subject of your request.
i:| Information pertained only to a third party. Your name is listed in the title only.
Cl Document s! originating with the following government agencyes! __._ _ W
_ _ _ _ . _ , was/were forwarded to them for direct response to you.
_-w»-- Page s! referred for consultation to the following government agency ies!; ..Wa.a_aa_,.aaii
as the information originated with them. You will
be advised of availability upon retum of the material to the FBI.
i Pagetsl withheld for the following reason s!:
i:| For your information: _ _ __
iz/The following number is to be used for reference regarding these pages:I00 I @1290 »!°!lFF;'-l H5 H
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxX DELETED PAGENS! §§No DUPLICATION FEE X
xxxxxx X FOR THIS PAGE X
XXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
xxxxxx
" .... _ "-.2. ¢,_ -F-~". _92f*'*_ H-.-',- l -
e -__ --. __.,,,.5..- . . ._ ___- -_ _...__ _.",.__ 5--.L.-IQ; --_QL4_m'~ _ -' ._ -1 ' _ -
. _' G B - "AC1. F - _. _ -. ;
._ - _ !__
-* . 5- iii _ '_._ . ._'. .,"_|:~ ____ " x - I . .. . '.~_?e -p _i_.-§- -1-n-. .1 _-_.. E e, _ - __ . I-1 _ ,___
,I
_ _ _ . _ ._ _ _. , _,_ pr... _ .- -ER; ~ mr 100-16616 1 -7 - A
up is-
. 5 '.~ _ .-. V. 7 92_ __ - 7 _=.___ _ 1:7.-. :i_I = i 92.¢ ~92 , _ e, ,.-_._"__, .*..._....-. _, _. . 7--_ "'- -1_ _. = . - . - .- 4" . -'. . " .-*--f- =~ 1-= 1",? . . . . . . .. _ _ .- . - _ - -_ -_ .-. _-_.-. ;-n92,_,"- . _ '.92, 1'. * '. ~~ _ _ ' _ __ 1-!: .. .- , .-' 4- eI 92 r ;. -7 = B7 letter to the Bureau dated 12/29455, -th ,--=.!,;*f-§_¬'.-r-'=_r.;£-_§' . recommended that the aubjeot be deleted tron t e BITT_ot- #f'3-;'~.;f,<.;2*5,._%'-."-'_
H - ' '1'92 .0-nl I-1-up §n§4nee_ ' - - ' . - 5-- - . 1- - . I 3 . "-. L1 ..é*- r .71 -'I.!'-.-.' "4? .'» aav In-a-an we-an mu-sunny _-- , _"92 ,- _, _ ~-I, -.--,- -3 1 , Qzv _ _ .21 15.: w " _ - i - - .. .. . ,1 .,. _ _ , - . :1 92 » - -1 -. . . - ---.-.'» - .- p--- =- _-.- -r '1- --1 - . =7 "- -. = -r-.1-~~=".-* .=.~d-.:"'<.. 1--. : ~_- .J:* .- L ; _ - . - . - . . . . _ _ r -_ ~ it . _l _-__;~'._._ P _ F _ ,7,qr___-e "
1. = - =-' Bub wee d aboard the 83 UEEH Ei.IZABEi'l__-:-1-:.*+=-'»;.'=
. _--_ 4 -__1;-I.
' - . ' -"Q: ' ~' -'--' -;;.*--"_;.__ '.._ " 11,2 |92_,'_' _'-"'_¢_; .- xi "f "'5-;~ -'3.-pk 1 !. - . - -., -1l,. .. 47:" --:»E§rI- $5: - ._ I-V I '-on 1- - ,; w S; 11; 92is.';".__-_ ,5-_r.. Q _ !1f:,»_4-.-92 ,__V..Q6 : P-li_= vlbderal eformatory or omen, e , I_- ' axe e available an additional lint oi unauthorized pereonl ' 'M,_ T.Ir2g'Qa uhn I-earl eeneeeen-nnn-ml hlih like -111»!-nO!_ IV]-elm Ahhlh-BQJQ-"'i;;:;E;=,.;'L?:!92_¬;»¢l"_" _ _ IIG-III BBB V¥A§UDrUl|lII'& IIAIQQ Dani -BU CCU all-QI U¥Q§UDrYl»i@C17C'-I_-_§5__:i_r'.-i, ,_v, ,@q-<§!°" was in the torn or birthday greetinge. The tact that
In- . ~ individual eorreeponded with the subject hae been noted. 1L this tact has been dieeeminatedeto the appropriate v1'11O_l_'5_¢§,:§{~:-i5;:'"_~_'{_:'?-- oi the individual oorreepondent ' '- ' ~- ' ~ *"'i- " A- "-1' .' . . . ' - n. 9 .r - I . . " er; _- _'_ A:-~;" -,_ . .. . ¢|1' ' _ _ , _ _ . . .. 7_~__- _- !._- V . , . - - - _ _ 1» "V - - .. .7 ' _ 9292 *-. - .
1. . . Reference is made to lead let out 1n_re£Q_roho§?d3;;;T>1f.-f.{,'III report dated 9/30/S5, to review oorrelation memo prepared
, 1 in the ITO. Ihia memo wae reviewed and it wee determined i _
§'II92aa§ Q Q IA1|e'l&w 'nQ 0gA|'..eaAe92AQ- nneaggqgvapl -lIIIIIIIAl Q ..-iA_- :5:-.*-.w'.i"_'_--l'_ .-_ Ulbjv Univ QQJVAAIJ IA LWQTQ III-IBII Hvalviauiu I001-V&lli.UI Yl_V_'<'!'_fV"_:_j'§_="_-__§l"re -~__'_1VF ' eubjeot prior to her indictment under Smith lot oi 19l;.0{?%;:.;-'j¬;:.;:-
~ t _ . the remaining reterencee were not deemed pertinent-4?.e'<.gg-§1;l"k?fe;'.;-,
-. inaenmoh es subject has been deported; therefore, they' wi11'~-*eij"L.J'*£5-1
- .. not be included ir; a report." Index_eard__e on reteredceejhavg
_ _ A been destroyed. _ -~i . ., ,2 i___.__b . ._ H33 <
. V. - --._V _ _':':'._:_r._-_ _-J.. - a _ - . a . - _ - . _P fg, _ . -_ " '~r ._ _1 1
;-|.7 __ d,. Ii p ,,. ,, -
. .-r_: .f¢. 7'_,.- _
1 I 45-. --' -- " H' I' i
.,, 92.'
{<1
vi. {I . -1
~ i
4-750 -7 79!
FEDERAL BUREAU DF INVESTIGATION
FDIPA DELETED PAGE INFDHMETIDN 51-IEETXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXX
Page s! wrthheld entrrely at l}l1l°- locatlon 1n the le One or more of the following statements, where
mdlcated explam thrs deletlon
lj Deleted under exempt1on s! _ _ with no segregable
matenal avarlable for release to you
Infonnatron pertarned only to a thlrd party with no reference to you or the subject of your request.
lI'lfOlTIlHlZlOl1 pertamed only to a thrrd party Your name rs llsted 1n the tltle only.
Documentlsl ongmatmg wlth the fol lowmg government agencyhes! _,_ T
_ _ _ e _ , was/were forwarded to them for direct response to you.
_____. Page s! referred for consultahon to the followmg govemment agencyhes!
_ _ _ as the mformatlon ongznated with them. You will
be adwsed of avE|lab1l1ty upon return of the matenal to the FBI
______ Page s! wlthheld for the followlng reason s!
For your mformatlon __ _
The followrng number
lI92f'92 I1'92 L/In
UV [GK Jvlube used for reference regardmg these pages
1 1 Y: n
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxX DELETED PAGE S! §§N0 DUPLICATION FEE X
X FOR THIS PAGE X
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
FBI/DOJ
u.t .- _ K
L _,'_
-". 1. £11-'3"1:-"' .4-{¢. .
; I _._.L.'-;_ ,, x .
_,-.. 1sgg-z%~ r
H I _, ' '92' __ _ "P iv . P
. r __, t ' '- I , _._ _ .- n 1' ' - 1 . _ _
;m_g__mIs'r1u'r:vngco1rr'n1 - __ - _
. ». - - - - : , .
nzrsnnlcl-n td'SA 30/5,! It.13337-~ ~= =1 G 115/§sT"P:35-»=-¢=
57¢;
- O; n; r
-1 -q 1
.-
' r"j.r
I - @.-.- ~- ~
.LD"n'1§.TB-5-E.¥YE..1Zé°F* L°9§'1'L2!.i QB?-EfT
- -- _ -- ,_ . __-,.' _,--,-.,..,1__.., ._ -92
I
" Iztran; euro ghuula be unod in rogortigg thiborn intern: on n 0 ovon - use 0 ou do .0 urn u ou 0 no 0 noun o ornntio
a nu uro on u 0 on 0 0 |_ouroo orao . 92 , 7
.'_, . L _ # iR1 "'
-- - ':-.1i
_ _, .I;Mar-_"---"..1
., ___.._. __ ,. 92_______ _-..r...'..__...__.,.e i»!-|---1::-an-.-_.92-.-.'».-._...-I-|e;,+; _,-; -- ~ _ ,_ ._ 1-_~ 5-
Irnnnnlnnlllnll f y '
.1, __ /Oie? Memorandum - UNITED sures eovnnmmnr
ro = mnmcron, FBI 00-72390! m92'ra= 2/16/55
M = SAC,HEl|' IQRK00-18676! - _
WI = cmmn vm=uQ:xo1.n1cx, was *
IS-G ' . ' ;
. 02141!
Re IFO let to Director, '5/5/51, and WFO r/e to NY, 1/26/56.
Relet reflects that Central Office INS res requested by letter to
advise UFO in advance, when deportation order relative to" subject ia to be .
made effective .
, ' In co liance with ref. r/s this -should be removed, as subject=75 was deported l2?§/55. _ - ~ . r - V .
ALL I qr .um929292"'"' 3'33 5111' mm! /" _ _.'i- 5 EXCEPT ~. H 5 '0I'Imzvr15;; W .at 1*
192»-;§ Ys5M. ' t,. J1: _..r
RECORDED.95 /N, .. 7; 590 »- 8-.2»- Bureau 00-72390! RM! ,5"... ---- ---' - Li ¢92
2- Washington Field CLAUDIA JONES! RH! 92."- '1- New York l0018676! -5! 3 1'7 1956 _ $1-~ L70 23 l __ -- k i '92 9292 ip EX. -we 7,
:- ~ 92' IL'-
J
'1
2' _ -Ub 2?1¢iee t _,,~,_ 1~
I I7g, .~,,;_.:'-_.,
'.- -1*.
'¬
-.|
¢
*.
Ht.-
'5
as..l_'_ ».4
,_r
92
|~
v
. ft-;._- ,1 1
' .?i
I
-
no
1-ii?
I -92
_:;-. Z92 ,3,5% V .0, '
I ,.__._4-_._-I-_-_.A_-;___ A_- _._ .|__ er |.,___ _--- __ ______li __L__: _ ___ _W it/i Vb iii- _ -F'__ _ . I
~ ~=---~:=~ c» ~.
Oi M6,v,w;.t...m - UNITED STA'1i:.S GOVERNMENT
I10}! 2 Hr _
SUBJBCT: CLAUDIA ZONES
INTERNAL SECURITY - C
There are. AhQ} to :Mr. F. J. Baumgardner~f392[ mm June 21, 1955
92
Tolml ._._._
Nidlofs __,.,_,_
Bordon .._...._.
Bolnon: _._._
ns ._._.....___.
Iain .-........__..
Pnnonl i
loses ._,____.__
Tana: .__._..i
Neale Hin7!'3_ 1?_f'1_'- 'i.lIlOl'!'UId _._
attached herewith ghe.ngcgg;yg ggife-
h t h f C1 d ' _- and one up-to-date o ogre No F au iéjénia which > s q_-___were taken fromna phoEogFapE appearing n the January,
1956, issue of Political Affairs." -
r,-. -
nscomnannarxon:
It is recommended that this negative and
photograph be placed in the captioned file for future
reference purposes. _ _ _ __ __".r "" U "9 ! I Et§:.;.1..:!h"!;'.r§~.W -aw -, , . 5,. M . =_--mu@~»~a?§,iut-;m p; 2% c E!=1iuz.; .5211: M]
mm 15* vm
gaff
" nzcnxm-;~ - 54 _._ ----
nnon: rm"" 7 JUNlNU
C.--l ' , 3-. jhi V ' A! ~12? i
L»; _ ,:,L_:_:-I05!9-Q31/92;CL0sI';P1: } - A '
5 EnclosuresA /
l§4'
H L 12,-~=i~SI'e B"a'59?§e73%z3
/00- 22,? Z11; /7 7
92
1 VFrau-rim! mllnlaliom and |>1 wisllca, Comrade Iiamiia.
T
COMRADE CLAL'D1.A ] }NES
Aitenmte Member. Nationml Committee. C.P.l.S.A.lh-u-mI~ rrlvaunl ismilh A11 pruanrr .92l<- Qnrm-9292 n|l.' Ad [!q:ml'1I'I
4-750 -7-79}
3.,XXXXXX
XXXXXX
XXXXXX
FEDERAL BUREAU OF lNVEST92ATIi.rll
FOIPA DELETED PAGE IIIFIIBMATIDN SHEET
Page sl withheld entirely at this location in the le. One or more of the following statements, where
indicated, explain this deletion.
[:3/Deleted under exemptionts! _ _ _ _ e- ._ __ with no segregable
{Ii
II]
Elmaterial available for release to you.
information pertained only toa third party with no reference to you or the subject of your request.
Information pertained only to a third party. Your name is listed in the title only.
Documentts! originating with the following government agencyliesl .
E EE E __ __ , was/were forwarded to them for direct response to you.
-i-- Pagelsl referred for consultation to the following government agencyes!; a..__iHd._m__
,_ 7 _,_ E __ as the information originated with them. You will
be advised of availability upon return of the material to the FBI.
_..___ Page s! withheld for the following reasontslz
Cl For your information: _ _E
E2/The following number is to be used for reference regarding these pages:
XXXXXX
XXXXXX
XXXXXXtoo-* la-39-"o ME EE;-E3,- -1;?-"E=*%i== E E
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXKXX
§ DELETED meats! §
X no DUPLICATION FEE X
X FOR THIS PAGE X
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
FBI/DOJ
-.»
92-
."
I
-1;.
-1.-1, E
._,"=1S'i
,. -.: -w v. .- I.,-U.
-,3
5-§
-e
"r. .
:95?
s
5
.-
I?. A~ .». 3-»-
_. -9212 ~i-Q2' _
3"--.5:
. 7_- - 1 ;
. ".4
92:55
" "--_'rnaA||nlIUlIlIn.I4 IL OOi Memorandum - UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
fro = Director, FBI _oo-12390!
4 =' n4'rn= July 11, 1956 .
Legal Attache, London 00-1201! f
/1 v=Jnc'r= cnaunnomnzs, Iith um» - ' '__/92 _Q*mwsmw- gig. _ . 1.8942»
UACB this latter is boling carried pendixg inactive. 7
5.?Q =~=~*~"":"*'f@ _l ! "' Q ' masmetrgly 9" 6g.3 .; 22.»! 9/ Decwssica -Ianitc _ , -:-1*§Z;g.°'fS P4 -JP 0-W M!21{~qo - Q09 u9 -fmlor RECUWE /0 ' . _
I .1-I
/ .Q 0o9292 %2/ .226 6 i2%:T92ssg?}z§t:%1§iH0YV1 *1, QT _ - _ &q U r _ 15 J92_JL'-107 I955 f . Du
F f "4:3 " 0 0§"°'":$.;-§;:~,~,,*,:~' ..92 0. 5 W w.a. -, ;.._ 3..-Ir -' -.: hp
.- .5:-0-__¢
1' 92__..1
.l_',
1.'Q
is
aq '
If _>I-* KI -_ ....._, .
92'A
3:
A . .
>
1-'-;".. ' -'3-T 75 -...1 _ ,_
F ":¬7"r.-J1-E *.-
+2
is
d?§
3
4..
_. .
_ .
:'92'r.';=¢»
.."-."-:5!.5 .1, $1.' :.< a
.1;-~.i. _..__._ <.-.-- -- ?_ _ -I -._ '_ ...._.._
FD-I -n s-:2-an1 0 _ Jd
FEDERAL BUéEAU OF i§aE§TlGATlON
REPORTING OIFIZ ' OFIIZ OF ORIGIN 7 WDATI ' lNVI;lC:TlV£ 7 77 7NEH XQBK ewe _NEH~¥ORK W §é2%é§6____4g£Z5§;}4%q9§g;__]_______mi OF CASE 92 It IY 1YiIY
COMPROS - NEW YORK: ELIZABETH ¢ g O 1955' °"" er
GURLEY FLYNN wa; ET AL -~All unrnamnnn comm INTERNAL _
r '92_-'1 P ":7 Linl IS llNfIlASSl.*lED / ; SMITH T °F 19*° _..iZ'ip_ [4- 7 -in so 5_f"1_Gs5g ""4 p_, _ l WW, ,_pl"',-is' "'5H5iE er several postponements, defense filed F !-
ap ellaitfélllbrief I1/I8/53. Government's ap eal brief filed 1*;2 ll/54. Argument on appeal held 5/10-ll/21+. Appellant's reply
$TZW%£WWW%W$?W $dppe s I'Ct.1J. . e en s con nueon bail pending appeal to US éupreme Court. Appellant'spetitioned US Supreme Court for writ of oertiorari ll/l3/54;petition denied 1 1O 55 and order issued l 17/55. DefendantsALEXANDER BITTELMAN, GEORGE BLAIGZ CHARNEY, QLIZABETI-I GURLEYg£YNN,ABEITY GANNETT, VICTOR JEREMY JEROME, ARNOLD SAMUEL JOHNSON,
_____AUDI JQNBS ALBERT FRANCIS LANNON JACO':' MINDEL PETTISPERRY, ALEXANDER TRACHTENIBERG, and §iI..LIAI/lu.iOLF wsiuswowsremanded to custody USM SDNY 1 ll 55. Defendant LOUISwsxms-rocx, taken into c1:1stody'by usm, Washington, 12.0. 2/2/55.
Ap ellant's petition for rehearing filed in US Supreme Court2%/55, and denied 2/28/55. Motions for suspension and/or _ '
reduction of sentences of defendants MINDEL and JONES F '-denied. Hearings in supplemental proceedings re U
payment of committed fines conducted 1953- Defendants
JONES and TRACI-ITENBERG paid fines in full, other
f C»/19.45/56¢/H-u:'n . MHZ} is W pp
d /47 |~ ./. 9 p'_.-22_92B au 100- - 14- RM!,[ ""£?92;>|s1'> D § ;_
p n page! _98 SEP 5 1956 -_21- New York 00-81752! 92 " 92__ . m:'.>Tf___Z - 1' » _ ;_ J _
- 100-81752 sub 23! -:92.e.1~¢-~ ...-- n"f_ .. 1T -i__»--92 . .»T£r92_1'B-L7? _ I.
92_ _/' ; 92 O J9292' . DAQP "d -9292 :, __{'/-.
92 92.". e s £5» YI». _92J/92_. ./_, .
'92f.'- r
1" £'
PROPERTY OF FB|.Thie report is loaned to you by the FBI, and neither it nor its contents are to be distributed outside the agency to which loaned.
$-
=.
.,_ . .1
_',_ _4
.,,-
~.
-:_.__
Ii.
.1_-5J1-
.¢_1
'4?r-J
.-._
-'-1 -
-'.1~;..f Y? 9'.
..;92__-F
~r
-J1
?§2
1*
1
-1*"
lr'B*3-1"I92'
.--.
_,_¢
-.,3L 1> _ :1-
-
1
' N.iv , 1:! 4:!
' J
NY 100-81752
Co ies Continued Bureau! '
I
1. I
1- USA, SDNY Rh New York cont'd
1..
1-1-
1-
1-
1-
.1-
11
1-
. -I
"-'.Z-_- fir; it _ .
Q
.3
I1
-.~ ,j z-'
.71
- Yr.-C. .- .' .-.'. Q :- .$1-"§92-.'§.;
92" ":{E'5
" "'
_1p.
~.
1
'2
'
-no J-5 .
4 -._...
5:
,1
-;.
F?
i.._{1.
:
_.
.92_;3j".
,_., -g-23._~u
1 .92 1
- .r
-3-=. r
-. L '-';§. NY 100-81752 <3;p__i : 7:: . If i __. ii.ii:- ~ -
.. C; 0
=1
Synopsis Cont'd!:
defendants, with exception of JOHSGLhave paid
small amounts on account. Defense moved for new
trial_l/Bl/55, on the basis of affidavit of
government witness HARVEY M. MATUSOW, who
alleged certain of his testimony was either
false or not entirely true. Hearing held on
motion 2/10/55, through 3/2l/55, and on Q/22/55,
USDJ EDWARD J. DINOCK denied motion as to all
defendants except CHARNEY and TRACHTENBERO, who
were granted new trials. Defense application
for renewal of CHARNEY and TRACHTENBERG motions
for Judgments of acquittal denied 5/26/56.
Defense application for f'reargument of motion
for new trial based on MATUSOw's affidavit
denied 5/26/55. On 6/3o/55, US Court of
Appeals, 2nd Circuit dismissed appeals of
defendants CHARNEY and TRACHTENBERG from
denial of motions for Judgments of acquittal.
Defense withdrew appeals frdadenials for motion
of new trial and motion for ' reargument of
motion for new trial on 9/13/55. Defendant
CHARNEY's payment on fine refunded 9/17/55;
TRACHTENBERG's fine refunded lQ/13/55. Details
of bail bond and travel extensions set forth.
Defendant ISRAEL AMTER, whose case was severed
1/ll/52, died ll/2h/SM; nolle prosequi entered
USDC, somr, 12/23/51¢. us vs. TRACHTENBERG E1 ALDefendants CHARNEY and Tsednrsssna eraereés * s
released from Federal Prison 4/22/55. Defendant
SIDNEY scram entered plea of not guilty 6/3/55.
On 6/E/55, trials of defendants BACHRACH, whose
case was severed during trial in 1952, CHARNEY
TRACHTENBERG,and STEIN were consolidated and
placed on trial calendar. Fugitives FRED MORRIS
FINE, JAMES EDWARD JACKSON, JR., AND WILLIAM
NORMAN MARRON, surrendered November and
December, 1955, all entered pleas of not guilty
and cases set for trial with those of BACHRACH,
CHARNEY, TRAGHTENBERG, and STEIN. Details of
9-1,1
K.
I
I-9
.1
1
<
!
. e.
-l_
é
..-_- :3-T-s"=3.!
__92_. F1-H ' Q
1
'-. -_-J,1;
I-4..
92 -¬.3 5.1-1
.'~"¬..'
Iv.
7??a
Q.
.-_. - J
1; Ii"'3 -is_ .
|
-If _ ,.;.
,_-'.4 1:3
"
.s~
1 ;-3
1!"il-
s.--x
I.5- C___ ____,_______.. . _._e___-A -----
I .
* J
NY 100-81752
Szgogsis §Cont'd!:
bail bond, travel extensions, and pre-trial
motions set forth. After numerous postponements
trial began H/9/56, USDJ ALEXANDER BICKS presiding.
Jury . impanelled, .. _4/23/56. Opening state-
ments made 4/30-5 1 56. Government's case
conducted from 5 1 56 until 6/6/56, and utilized28 witnesses; On 6/15/56, defense moved for
directed verdict of acquittal for all defendants.
Motion granted 6/18/56, as to sacrrnacn on ground
evidence insufficient to sustain conviction.
Defense conducted its case 6/19-7/19/56,
utilizing 7 witnesses including defendant
CHARNEY, Defense renewed motions for directed
verdicts of acquittal; motions denied 7/19/56.
USDJ BICKS ruled¬ 7/25/56 he had found clear
and present danger existed at time indictment re-
turned.Defense and Government summations heard
7/25-26/S6. Judge charged Jury 7/BO/56, and
Jury retired to deliberate 12:50 p.m. At
3:00 p.m.= 7/31/56, Jury forelady announced
verdict,al1 defendants guilty as charged.
9/17/56, set as date for sentencing,.Defense
motion granted to defer additional motions until
sentencing date; Defendants continued on
bail pending sentencing.
- ps _
-....
.._ .-:.
v F 0-- ,. I '4
,.
_ 3 -
.. -92
.,}
..-an-I
-
:-
1
--1
5%-- -1
113- -l7.._ :,~.;.
st;$.rA;i¢_;
V n-.§
._- _ _;~,- 1..' Qp3___ _ _._,,,. ____ ____,__92,____.-¢=:u~~-|- ilK-
I 1
NY 100-81752
T5131-E QF §Q192TT_E¥TT$:
I. UNITED STATES VS. ELIZKBETH GURLEY
FL j MJIOIIOIIOOOIIIIQII IIOOIIIIOA. Appellate Proceeding; and
Remanding to Custody...........
B. Motions, United States District
Court, Southern District of
YOPRIOOIOCOIIOIIIOUIOIOIOOO
CI Fines!IOIIQIIOOIOOOOIOIIIIIIIII
DI BaillIOUDIIOCIIIQIIQQIOUQUIIIII
ll RevisionsilllIIIOOOQIUIIIII
20 ExtensionscUQQQOQIIOIIOOQGO
EU ERIlOQlOIOIIIIIIIIOICO
II. UNITED STATES VS. ALEXANDER
AL'I-..I..I.......'..
A. Arraignment and P1eading.... .
Bo Att0PneYB....-.......-.-.......
1. Government................
Q. DefenSe..'............"..
C. l.-'-....."..............' I
1. BondII..I....'.'.....' I.
2' EZt6nsiOnS.....-..-.-.-.Ȣ-
Do PP8-Trial MOtiOnB..~..»-.¢-..-.-
EQ Trialpqpunuoooaoaoloaaacanuoaloo
_.___....._.___:_.. _. _ _ yaw-| __ W-____ ~ I" "'-33..Page Number
INTRODUCTIONQIIIOIIOIIIOOOIOIIIIIIIIIIOIQIIQ
- 92
._'»_ 1,
f :
i:._-.-I-'_I 92 ' I.--'.§I_~;_;'
f4'$r-~§¢.§;
ca-5'" =-
.-,,.p~¢
F ,"'
4'.-T ".-> ...
..,_, 2:.
.
a
74'!
g; 3ll
|--w--
G
.- .- _ L_. _ ,_-._...- ~_ .;; +1-41,: "~1>'
Y A
NY'10o-81752
DETAILS: This is a oin port of
and
All information containedthe record of Criminal Docket Cl3h-7, United States District 92
Court, Southern District of New York, or in the records of
l l 3We
I
herein appears in
the United States Court of Appeals, Second C cuit
Tmmnnnnnmrnm '
-1-41 -I-A Ivnrvva.-5vJI-u-nun-an-n--1--.-we
!
clarity, this report has two sections:
legal proceedings in United States vs.
ELIZABETH GURLEY FLYNN, ET AL; Section Two sets forth legal
proceedings in United States vs. ALEXANDER TRACHTENBERG,ET AL.For
Section One sets forth
The FLYNN and TRACHTENBERG cases were based
on the same indictment which was retrhedi-a-Federal Grepd.Jury,
Southern District of New York, on June 20, 1951, and charged
defendants with violation of Section Three of the Smith Act,,_; '
Statg. 671,18 U.S.C. 9A6 ed. ! Section 11, and 18 u.s.c.
l9A8 ed. ! Section 371.
Twenty-one defendants were indicted at that v
time. Seventeen were apprehended, SIDNEY STEIN, FRED MORRIS
FINE, JAMES EDUARD JACKSON, JR., and WILLIAM NORMAN NARRON beingfugitives. Sixteen defendants went to trial on March S1, 1952, in
the FLYNN ease, the ease of ISRAEL ANTER {now deceased; having
been severed because of bad health. The case of MARION BACHRACH
was severed during trial because she suffered from cancer.
Judgments of acquittal were entered on September 23, 1952, as
to defendants SIMON GERSON and ISIDORE LEGUN
The thirteen defendants convicted by a Jury
in the United States District Court, Southern District of New
York, on January 21, 1953, in the FLYNN case were, ALEXANDER
BITTELNAN, GEORGE BLAKE CHARNEY, ELIZABETH GURLEY FLYNN, BETTY
GANNETT, VICTOR JEREMY JEROME, ARNOLD SAMUEL JOHNSON, CLAUDIA JONES,
ALBERT FRANCIS LANNON, JACOB NINDEL, PETIS PERRY, ALEXANDER
TRACHTENBERG, LOUIS NEINSTOCK, and NILLIAM WOLF HEINSTONE.D
92
Two of those convicted, ALEXANDER
TRACHTENBERG and GEORGE BLAKE CHARNEY, were granted new
- 4 -
.,. ~§'¬';~
ax.
.-....;-_-I
Wu
1. '5"."l$ ',:.!
-1Ia?» 1
_."-¢
,._
92 l-/"r
i
"' 5,~~§' -
if f
Ira I. 11'.____ ..,._<_,_ . ' -!.::' .-.~'-.i:;":=' - 5-_
that'-?3"?.g*'-:4
-i'g'>,;92...={__g', 4; 4 J,
i
"W!"
§?+:1*1..
seq
..
'_;..
Q? '
- ,..-1.
--... -¢__~
_..
_ 92-,- 92NY 100-B1752
trials on April 22, 1955, as a result of a defense motion
based on Government Witness HARVEY M. MATUSOW's affidavit
recanting his testimony.
Fugitive SIDNEY STEIN was apprehended in_
August, 1953 at Twain Harte, California; fugitives FINE,
JACKSON, and MARRON surrendered in November and December,
1955.
The defendants in the United States vs.
ALEXANDER TRACHTENBERG, ET AL case were, MARION BACHRACH,
GEORGE BLAKE CHARNEY, FRED MORRIS FINE, JAMES EDWARD
JACKSON, JR., WILLIAM NORMAN MARRON, SIDNEY STEIN, and
ALEXANDER TRACHTENBERG.
I_-..V1*_l?BP__$L1£iI§§l¢'§- EPIZ§3E_T§_91[RLEY_FL¥NN: PT A1:
Q-,§EPe}1ate Pr9¢eedinseaenélemeadiaa t2,C 53°dX
On February 3, 1953, notices of appeal from
their conviction of January 21} 1953, in the United§£%§s§.§1§.%§1§§.§2s§§i,S£%t¥§2 g§§ez§j§%.2£._§s"..§8 §¢Asses 5; sag; asses nr, aesa . as evesdais as
until April 15, 1953, to file the record on appeal.
On April 15, 1953, a stipulation was filed extending
the time to May 15, 1953, and on May 14, 1953, another
stipulation was filed extending the time to May 25, 1953.
A stipulation was filed on May 25, 1953, extending the
time given defendants to docket the appeal and file the
record on appeal to May 28, 1953. _
On May 27, 1953, Defense Attorney MARY
M. KAUFMAN filed a motion to extend the time to October l5
1953, for the filing of thegnxd record and the docketing
of the appeal before the United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit. This motion was returnable June 1,.
1953, and in amattached affidavit Attorney KAUFMAN stated
that additional time was required since she had been the_
only defense attorney able to work on the case since the
end of the trial.
- 5 -I__ __________ _:7___________ __ _ __ _ W4.-i._ ___;, i_ ;-._-¬
.r~ "
13;...4- 1"
,,.@-:3.-I
¥--I-.-_e4,.
_.92
.,.,_'. _.92.. Iii:
Ji-
.1-
-vi
§' ':
~ §---5'. .5 .
If
'41;.
.1; -~
:51-. . _,'
.37
= ,1' E
-,u._r-_
-at
dad
'-4.
_.-
-1?-e. QIr_?_i_,;__*____T A,_ _____ __ ._.._.,_ __?--__
', LT O
Y 1
NY 100-B1752
The United States Court of Appeals, Second
Circuit on June 1, 1953, granted an extension of time
to the defense to Cctober l, 1953, and ruled that the,
Government would have sixty days thereafter to file its
brief on appeal; On October 5, 1953, the Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit granted further extension to November 16,
1953.
On November 12,_l953, Defense Attorney
KAUFMAN applied for and received permission to file
a 350 page brief and was granted an extension to
November l8, 1953, in which to file this brief. The
brief was filed on November 18, 1953, by KAUFMAN and
reflected that Attorney HARRY SACHER had assisted in
its preparation. -
The Government brief on appeal was
filed on February ll, 1954, with the United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The argument'
on appeal was set for April 6, 195M.
motion was filed on March 19,
the date set for the arguneh$}'
1954, based on two affidavits
METZGER, former District Judge
Hawaii, and A. L. WIRIN, Los Angeles attorney, were
assisting defense counsel on appeal and required additional
time to prepare the arguments on appeal.A defense
1954, for continuance of
on appeal until July l2,
attesting that DELBERT E.
Justices JEROME N. FRAK and THOMAS SWAN,
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, ruled on
March 20, 1954, that if the appellants could within one
week represent to the court that METZGER and WIRIN would
appear for the arguamnt on appeal on May 10, 1954, a
continuance would be granted to that date.
Attorney ROYAL W. FRANCE on March 26, 195B,
filed a notice of motion in the United States Court of
Appeals, Second Circuit for permission to file a briefamius curiae, which application was denied on April 5,
195 .
_ 6 -
_ -Q- as
4.-'-uh-I
-
,-_
_u.
-J 4;
:~ -_ 1_'.._ 0
-¢,._'=~_a.'-, -me -1' '--*.'1.92- ga-92-1,-. -, ;-are
§§§¬
TI:-"5.-'=';_f:
.:--
92 ,
'5" ,
3%s- _,..
2-r~
see;
92_'_-_
- I»-_____ 7* __92______________,,__v a&inm_4
-~ at 0
NY 100-B1752
Justice THOMAS SWAN, United States Court
of Appeals, Second Circuit, on March 29, l 54, set thedate for argument on appeal as May 11, 1954, but on April 5,
1954, because of a court calendar adJustment, the date for
argument was set as May 10, 1954.
The argument on appeal was held in the -
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, on May 10 and
ll, 1954, before Justices HARRIE CHASE, CARROLL 0. HINCKS,
and JOHN HAHLAN. Special Assistant to the United States
Attorney, Southern District of New York, JAMES B.
KILSHEIMER and Assistant United States Attorney, Southern
District of New York LEONARD B. SAND argued for the .
Government. Attorneys MARY KAUFMAN, HARRY SACHEB, DELBERT
E. METZGER, and A. L. WIRIN argued for appellants.
Appellant's reply brief was filed on
May 14, 1954, in the United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.
On October 14, 1954, the conviction was
affirmed unanimously by the United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit. The Government on October 15, 1954,
filed a notice of motion in the Court of Appeals
seeking the issuance of a mandate forthwith so that
bail could be revoked and the defendants directed to -
surrender, A hearing was held on October 15, 1954,
and Justice HAHLAN ordered the issuance of the mandate
forthwith. At 4:00-pam,, October 15, 1954, the Goverr
presented the mandate of the United States Court of "
Appeals, Second Circuit to United States District Judge
EDWARD J. DIMOCK and moved for immediate revocation of
bail and the surrender of the defendants by 10:00 a.m.,
October 16, 1954; .
Judge DIMOCK changed the wording of the
calling for surrender of the defendants to make
it read that the defendants were to appear before him
on October 16, 1954, at 10:00 a.m.
In the hearing held before Judge DIMOCK,
United States District Court, Southern District of Newmandate
- 7 -
Q.§
-4'i . ,:
-s
,,-.
RB!, -u_ .I":92_92 . 5. _,, -_'one
_{§§?1_l'.
4
.~ ,
-a
.i 4.
.1_ WU ~V7_ __ i__ i _ ____fl__ __.l_i . <1,-~ 1- --1 -2-i
'- '0
NY 100-81752
York on October 16, 1954, the Judge ruled that the
testimony of government witness JOHN LAUTNER about his
é"'9211'lR1nh f"r~nm 1-ha !.nrnm11n'ln~l-, 'D::~n'I-nr vramainnrl ca n-|1'hs:H-,:.'n92'l-,'l-_-:""1-it--' 15 '5'. 35.3 92,¬li92IU1}-53$ bi Y § YlIl%-Lil? "MU kihillllin
question of law for the United States Supreme Court.
The Government moved for a surrender date for the
following week in order to give defendants an opportunity
to_petition the United States Supreme Court for certiorari.
Judge DIMOCK ordered defendants continued on bail pending
appeal and granted the defendants thirty days in which
to file their appeal with the United States Supreme Court.
On October 25, 195%, the Government moved
in the United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit for
recall of the mandate on appeal which had been issued on
October 15, 1954, and for re-issuance of that mandate forth-
¥#h,with the clarification that the Court of Appeals
round that the case involved no substantial question which
should be determined by the Supreme Court and which
would Justify the admission of appellants to bail
pending the application for certiorari. The Government also
moved for reoooation of appellants bail and immediate
remanding of appellants.
On November 9, 195R, the Government's
application was denied.
Appellants filed a petition for certiorari
in the United States Supreme Court on November 13, 1954,
and the petition was denied on January 10, 1955.
On January 10, 1955, United States District
Judge IRVING B. KAUFMAN ordered revocation of bail
and ordered warrants issued for all defendants except
LOUIS UEINSTOCK, who was then on trial in a separate
perjury proceeding in the United States istrict Court,
Washington, D.C. After Attorney HARRY SACHER had argued
before United States District Judge KAUFMAN that it was
not within the power of Judge KAUFMAN to order defendants
" remanded since no order had as yet been entered by the
. _ 8 _
_. __._, ...-.-qv---._-up-u.,,.......--__ +._a _ --
-v
Q-sun-=
4- -...
as
I,
' ,- .'','.'»"'1ej:¬';.-I
rewt,_,a:£f'2 0
ah
i
-1
-'1
':3
_q-1:1
"'1"!
ifif.
:" _¢
aI! i . -- ~~ J :1 0
1" "i 5 |
Y 4 i__-_.._,~-_- _~ W I-- _ _, ,_ _ _ ___,____ii -_,:_»_ J . ;, ~* 1 -1:7 A ea ~.__ ______,_ -:,__....- ~;~,-_-. ;- - e~~ _ ; ;-at -in e 7
H. "'
»
NY 100-81752
United States Supreme Court on its denial of certiorari,
the hearing was transferred to the trial Judge, United
States District Judge EDWARD J, DIMOOK. Attorney SACHER
stated that on January 11, 1955, he had filed a motion
to stay the entry of the Supreme Court's order denying
-Icertiorari pending the appellant's timely application for
a rehearing.
Judge DIMOCK denied continuance of bail and
defendants ALEXANDER BITTELMAN, GEORGE BLAKE CHARNEY,
ELIZABETH GURLEY FLYNN, BETTY GANNETT, VICTOR JEREMY
JEROME, ARNOLD SAMUEL JOHNSON, OLAUDIA JONES, ALBERI
FRANCIS LANNON, JACOB NINDEL, PETTIS PERRY, ALEXANDER
TRACHTENBERG, and WILLIAM WOLF WEINSTONE remanded to
custody of United States Marshal, Southern District of
New York. Attorney HARRY SACHER on January 13, 1955, made
application before United States District Judge DIMOOK
to vacate the order revoking bail, stating that Justice
FELIX FRANKFUHTER, United States Supreme Court, had ,
granted a stay until January 17,1955,forthe'issudneriEn
Court order denying appellant's petition for eertiorari-This application was denied. '
The order of the United States Supreme
Court denying appellant's petition for writ of certiorari
was issued at noon on January 17, 1955.
United States District Judge DIMOCK on
February 2, 1955, executed an order revoking bail and
issued a sench warrant for LOUIS wEINSTOCK.
HEINSTOCK was taken into custody by the United States
Marshal, Washington, D.C. on February 2, 1955, at the
conclusion of his perjury trial in the United States
District Court, Washington, D.C.
Appellants filed a petition with the
United States Supreme Court on February 4, 1955, for a
rehearing. This application was denied on February 28,
1955.
_ 9 -.3I IB
1
G
4
-31-
lid
FE!
Ann
eta
at?-_ '../_f;".--
n?
-2
'-ia i
IL .. 92
1
*'-|W4_-I
_-.4.
, .._v-.1-_._ ~ , _ ~ . ;.:r ~15-11,, "1 -'.
1? T , .-
92..-
Y 5
EY 100-81752if!
B. Motions, United States District Court,
if __Svouthg11_n Difsjfriotp of New Yer}: if pi 5
A motion was filed on January 25,
1955, returnable on January 31, 1955, on behalf of
defendants NINDEL and JONES asking for reduction and/or
suspensions of their sentences on the grounds of
MINDEL!s age and health and on the ground of JONES
health. Incorporated in the motion papers was a ,»statement that defendigt JONES was willing to departthe United States J01 S subsequently departed or
England voluntarily on December 9, 1955, under an
Immigration and Naturalization Service deportation
warrant!.
On April 1,TA 'I"921955, United States District
Judge UIMOCK denied the applications of NINDEL and JONES
and recommended that MINDEL be transferred to the Federal
Medical Center for Prisoners, Springfield, Missouri. Judge
DIMOCK's decision stated that the motion for reduction
of JONES sentence would be granted unless the Government
filed a formal statement that a special diet, required
by JONES, was available at the Federal Heformatory for
Women, Alderson, west Virginia, and that such a diet
would be furnished to JONES during service of her
sentence.
The Government filed such a statement on
April 12, 1955- On April 5, 1955, the defense applied
for deletion from Judge DIMOOK's decision of April l,
1955, the recommendation that MINDEL be transferred to
the Federal Medical Center
Missouri, and the deletion
The defense
for an order to show cause
granted based on the affidavit of government witness HARVEYfor Prisoners, Springfield,
was granted on April 11, 1955.
applied on January 31, 1955,
why a new trial should not be
M. MATUSOU, who alleged that certain matters to which
: 3 ~ 10 -
§
-7'
E
.e,»__ I;
nag
I
.. 1
IEQ
r , ,,;, -L ._
2-2'13
._, _
92'n»"»''.'-I'.'-.92-
§'{';%':.+ , - L _"A1
*2?
.-1,":____ ____ _= -->7 Y~"~4 %_?' ri _|q_ maxi
- - "3
Y q Q
NY 100-81752
he testified were either false or not entirely true. Thehearing on this motion was set for March 10, 1955, bg
United States District Judge DIMOCK and on February ,
1955,at a hearing before Judge DIMOCK on a motion to
quash a Federal Grand Jury subpoena served on MATUSOH,
the date of the hearing was reset for February 10, 1955.
The hearing began on February 10, 1955, and concluded on
NBPGD 21, 1955. On April 22, 1955, United States District
Judge DEMOCK filed an opinion denying the defense motion
as to all defendants except CHARNEY and TRACHTENBERG who
were granted new trials.
Defense Attorney KAUFMAN on May 6, 1955,
filed a petim and notice of motion for reargunent
of the notion for new trial on behalf of those defendants
whose motions had been denied. ,This application was
denied by Judge DTEDCK on ay 20, 1955.
On May 10, 1955, a notice of motion was
filed for an order permitting the defendants TRACHTENBERG
and CHARNEY to renew their motions for Judgments of
acquittal and to set aside the verdict of guilty and p
to enter Judgments of acquittal. This motion was denied
on May 26, 1956, by Judge DIMOCK. 5 '
The United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit on June 30, 1955, entered its Judgment
dismissing the appeals of defendants TRACHTENBERG and
CHARNEY from the denial of their motions for Judgments
of acquittal. This order was entered on July 11,
1955, in the United States District Court by United
States District Judge ALEXANDER BICKS making the Judgment
of the Court of Appealsthe Judgment of the United States
District Court.
A stipulation was filed by Defense
Attorney KAUFMAN in the United States District Court on
September 13, 1955, withdrawing the appeal from Judge
DIMOCK's denial of the Defense motion for new trial based
on MATUSOW's affidavit and the motion for reargument of
that motion for new trial.
'4
- JP. :
15
->_-,_ --.o
i__ 1_ - Ia
_ -'.92' ~11-. 141- -9-
1": ,
.=;"
u.
-Z£
I -!92 '= :1 J:_;::j .@ _-
géa-r..
.:
U-1_ ~._ 4.u-.- .:w
i
.
,__
e
11%
A
_92'r.'*:"J
. 9.; 1rag u i'-'.;.-, _
J WY
94
~.
92-__ v _ 7;__A____ ___ _ }i-
' LC O
NY 100-81752
C. Fines
An order was entered by United States
District Judge DIMOCK on February 20, 1953, staying
execution of defendants committed fines pending appeal
of their conviction on the condition that each defendant
submit to an examination by the Government to determine
the assets of each defendant and that each defendant
agree to post a bond to cover such assets as were
discovered except for those necessary for ordinary
living expenses.
After several postponements, supplemental
proceedings in connection with the collection of fines
began on August 19, 1953. The following hearings were
held:
August 19,19: Defendants FLYNN and CHARNEY were examined
,3 in the presence of their attorney, JULIUS
COHEN
August 27,l95_ Defendants BITTELMAN and WEINSTOCK were
J examined in the presence of their attorney
JULIUS C01-ZEN
Defendants GANNETT and JEROME were
examined in the presence of their attorney
JULIUS COHEN
Defendant PERRY
presence of hisSeptember 2Q,
1953
September 28,
1953was examined in the
attorney JULIUS COHEN
October 6,9 Defendants MINDEL and WEINSTONE were
1 53 examined in the presence of their attorney
MORTON FRIEDMAN
October 15, Defendants JOHNSON and LANNON were examined
1953 in the presence of their attorney MORTON
FRIEDMAN
-12-
.,3
.'*§Z
4-5.-I
ri'_*-;a 1:
"?."¬.%
uL
.00
. Q
iiea
aee
-;_.»_ ?_.Illa-c:_'
. J '
- ~f.~
'.,r-._,A- L:meg
. -,,_eee
. . . _,.,,_
hr
.,..gm
...
9292
ea
-
'8-w
. A
- >-7 1.
N! l0O0l?52
November 9,
1953
fine..-__¢_ __;.' _@¢- i "" i
if: O
Defendant JONES was examined in the presence
of her attorney MORTON FRIEDMAN -
No examination of defendant TRACHTENBERGwas conducted as he agreed to make full payment of his_
Attorney JULIUS COHEN agreed on October 23,1953. that his defendants would pay approximately ten
per cent of their salary per month toward their committed
fines in lieu of the issuance of garnishee orders against
them.
PsiaaaantThe following amounts of their committed
fines have been paid to date by the defendants: _
Fine Amount Paid Bslsaaéws
BITTELMAN
CHARNEY
FDYNN
GANNETT
JEROME
JOHNSON
JONES
LANNON
MINDEL
?ERHY
TRACHTENBERG
WEINSTOCK
WE INSTONE$6,000.00
0,000.00
00.0000.00
00.00
00.00
00.00$ 336.00
338.00
"'1
.2
' 5
,.,A '1
' >1
t
4
.,
_-9292,. -." ' .
--
-. I
E5
aq-
av
vs.-__>
_.,p.
,.
92AA____ ___ _ _,_,:;: 13-1,, _ -Li _-__ ~
O C3
NY 100-81752
This
proceeding was based on the order of United States
District Judge DIMOCK granting these_de§e ants new
trials. On September 17, 1955, the $338.00 paid by
CHARNEY was returned to him by the Cashier, United-
States District Court, Southern District of New York.
On October 13, 1955, the six $1,000 United tates
Treasury Bonds deposited by TRACHTENBERG on February 16,
195A, to be held in escrow pending appeal, were returned
to him.their -fines, by CHARNEY and TRACHTENBERG.
nd
S
D. Bail
1. Revisions
The terms of defendant CHARNEY's bail
bond were rewritten on March 18, 1953, to shew that $
would continue to be posted by HATTIE CHARNEY, his
wife, $1,000 by JACOB L. CHARNEY, his father, and_that
the balance would be covered by a property bond of
$19,000 on the property of JACOB L. CHARNEY at l%0ll05
Hilkins Avenue and 659 Jennings Avenue, both Bronx,
New York. JACOB L. CHARNEY also furnished the United
States Attorney, Southern District of New York a Coneggiqn
of judgment for $19,000 against the above property.92-Iv
On January 8, 1959, $5,000 of defendant
GANNETT'B bail which had been pOStBd by GERTRUDE YARIS,
her sister-in-law, was withdrawn and BERNARD LEWIT, who
previously posted $5,000, posted an additional $5,000. -
GAETTs bail also consisted of $2,000 posted by hermother, SARAH LEWIT, 943 Sherman Avenue, Bronx, New
York, ¢1,000 posted by her sister-in-law, MOLLY STRONGWATER
2735 Barker Avenue, Bronx, New York, and $2,000 posted
by her sister-inlaw, GERTRUDE YAHIS.
Judge DIMOCK filed an order on January 12,
1954, reducing the bail of defendant BACHRACH to $6,500.
_ 14 --
I
._-I
1.-r
-ii-C
rte
92
-v
.-21'!
~01
1
-, --'2'}, Z+,g~- -.-.-I "-.92'. '5 -'92"- --1 "'5., _--5|éd
-;:i'
'-
,1
k_ _ _ , _______,_ _,_ ._ _ -15,, -~1_,_.-..,l.¢~-1--- |_||hii-#"'--1-.--n|n- r ~ 7___ _
NY 100-81752
2. Extensions
I'1'v-92-1+-nil Q+":|'|-an T924 Q1-10'! n'I- T192r'lnc92 'r'D"TT92T£'1 QMUG HUG-HUD J]-I-§llJnul-92-Iv I!9292|lb¢ &i92U-l..H|92I Cl]
KAUFMAN executed an order on February 17, 1953, extending
defendant wEINSTONE's bail limits to include the Eastern
District of New York.
On March 2, 1953, United States District
Judge GREGORY NOONAN denied a motion by all defendants,
except HEINSTONE who resided in the Eastern District
of New York, for enlargement of bail limits to include
the Eastern District or New iork ior the purpose or
raising funds to defray expenses of their appeal and
to pay debts contracted for their legal defense.
United States District Judge THOMAS F,
MURPHY on May 19, 1953, executed an order permitting
defendant TRACHTENBERG to leave the Southern District
of New York from May 22, 1953, to May 29, 1953, {orbusiness purposes.
United States District Judge MURPHY
executed an order on May 25, 1953, permitting defendant
WEINSTOCK to travel to the Eastern District of New York
from May 25, 1953, to June 7, 1953, in connection with
his employment.
United States District Judge SYLVESTER J.
RYAN executed an order on June 1, 1953, granting
permission to defendant BACHRACH to travel to and
from the Southern District of New York and Kent, -
Connecticut from June 1, 1953, through October 15,
1953, and to and from the Southern District of New York
and East Blue Hill, Maine between July 10, 1953, and
August 20, 1953.
On June 15, 1953, United States District
Judge RYAN denied an application for an order granting
-15.-
'!Ir__"
XC
_»
5+3
an
-Q
gm
.0-
;!--T .' .;-ji
'92
L5-we
4
L -
av
_J D ip ._ .92t _ ._.-,' 2__- _
a
e
,1
'3
§$
' .| I
Fur-7
w7§i -.
F-_ _ W 7 H u__ h__7_7_L*____ 1 _: ._?1,_~,,.%_
I92
Q.ur
NY 100-51752
defendant GANNETT permission to travel to the Eastern
District of the Northern Division of the State of
Washington between June 25, 1953, and August 8, 1953,
in order to assist the defendants in the Seattle Smith
Act trial, United States'vs. HUFF, ET AL. United States
District Judge RYAN also denied a motion for'an order
permitting defendants CHAHNEY, PERRY, JOHNSON, LANNON,
and FLYNN to travel to and from any point within the
continental limits of the United States for the purpose
of raising funds. "
United States District Judge BEAN on
June 17, 1953, denied an application by defendants FLYNN
PERRY, J OIENSON , BITTELMMN, IRAOIITENBERG, JEROME, LANNON,
WEINSTOCK, JONES, GAHNETT, MINDEL, and CHARNEY for an
order to permit them to travel to and from any point
within the Southern District of New York and the Eastern
District of New York for the purpose of raising funds.
This motion was re-argued before United States District"
Judge RYAN on July 1, 1953, and once again he denied
the motion. -
United States District Judge RYAN on
June 22, 1953, granted an unopposed application by CHARNEY
for an order to permit him to travel to Albany, New
York, between and including June 25, 1953, and June 26,
1953, for the purpose of appearing as<icounse1 in behalf
of the Communist Party, USA in The matter of the _
inquiry by the Board of Regents relative to subversive
organizations pursuant to Chapter 360 of the Laws of
1939 New York Feinberg Law!".
with the consent of the Government on
July 28, 1953, United States District Judge EDWARD
NEINFELD executed an order permitting defendant L
to travel to Fort Devens, Ayer, Massachusetts on
July 28, 1953, and to return to the Southern District of
New York by midnight on July 30, 1953.A11
UH
.1~ *-._ ;. fr
#1-,1--
>._, __
.15
. ;-1_=' nu-92
" - .5
¢.ZZ"'
~.- -..
.-k!
ii
~raa
.-;'1?'92'--rte
rsgit .
._,,__
.'_
¢=._
L '1---'
J Q.
. '
,--
4
-w '
|. ..
.-. -ukwA - -~ t-~ 7 '__>~_;_*_A T ' F W _ 7 _
Jff O
JNY 100-81752
by United
extending
East Blue
denied onAn order was filed on August 18, 1953,
States District Judge DAVID N. EDELSTEIN
permission to defendant BACHRAOH to remain in
Hill, Maine until September 20, l953= '
§
United States District Judge EDELSTEIN
December 23, 1953, an application by defendant
JEROME for permission to spend two weeks in Rochester,
New York.
An order was executed on February 10,
195%, by United States District Judge JOHN F. X. MC GOHEY
extending defendant CHABNEY's bail limits to include
the Northern District of New York between February 14,
195h, and February 15, 1954.
United States District Judge EDWASD H.
CONGER on June 9, 195a, granted permission to defendant
BACHRACH to travel to and from Kent, Connecticut on
weekends only between June 11, l95#, and the Labor
Day weekend of 1954.
On June 21, 1954, United States District
Judge CONGER granted the application of defendant JONES
for permission to reside at Arverne, Rockaway Beach,
Long Island, and to perform travel to and from that
location until September 30, 1954. This order was filed
on June 25, 195A.
United States District Judge MC GOHEY
on September 30, 195R, granted permission to defendant
WEINSTOCK to travel to washington, D.C. for the purpose
or appearing at his arrainment in a perjury proceeding
then pending against him in the United States District
Court, Washington, D.C,
Defendant LOUIS WEINSTOCK was granted
permission on January 7, 1955, by United States District
-17.-
4
W.I
.- xf..i_,__a__.»
.s -.. t1
e
I
r "-at-ngag;*4:?§m
*-w
1., .
~§F
1
,_if
q ":-i~J *
534"' IA I_ - :1;-
4
ml
_-4'
.-- -1
§.<.s_ -._ .-I14H-
?5§.{.:_.
'4¢|.£-s"..:;
u ..
rna-1;
. -._ __ ;:____*, %_.- -_ __ '1;-.gunl-u4l:*
'1
-C} C!
NY 100-81752
Judge NOONAN to travel to Washington, D.C. in connection
with the perjury case then pending against him there.
E. ISRAEL AMTER
Defendant ISRAEL AMER's case had been
severed on January ll, 1952, by a Government motion .
on the grounds of illness. -
On December 8, 1954, Attorney DKVID
FREEDMAN moved for discharge of the bail bond of AMTER
who died on November 24, 1954. The Government consented
By order of United States District Judge NOONAN a nolle
prosequi was entered as to AMTER on December 23, 195k.
11- UZYITFQ §sTATE§ Y5» EEQQNQEB TR5¢_HTEN?BE.3G as 3'1
A. Arraignment andigleading
United States District Judge EDWARD
WEINFELD on April 22, 1955, issued an order directinf
the release of defendants TRACHTENBERG and CHARNEY from
Federal Prison based on the opinion of United States
District Judge DIMOCK on April 22, 1955, granting them
new trials.
On May 26, 1955, defendant SIDNEY STEIN_f
appeared before United States District Judge VINCENT J.t
LEIBELL, Southern District of New York for pleading to
the indictment. The pleading was adjourned until.
June 3, 1955. STEIN*s appearance in court was by writ
of habeas corpus and prosequendum issued by the United _
States District Court, Southern District of New York.
This procedure was necessary since STEIN was then
incarcerated as a result of his conviction on April 26,
1954, in the United States District Court, Northern '
District of California, San Francisco, California for
violation of Title 18,U.S.C. 3 and U.S.C. 371. STEIN
entered a plea of not guilty before Judge LEIBELL on
June 3, 1955, and bail was fixed at $50,000.
-13..
as
oi-_,-"1?*;:
" .;_.
-bi
....-
IN
.
:-'
.11
.:» _
I 5;
?'*
1,
a
1:." "ti=des
%an
?-.'i':1 5-"S34 . n
e
1.13%
1:1. , 1.._,.- -. - _,l~__ _é=.-1;
;_.- .
3.
.~
a?' _l
..-b _1
,.'is-'12
r
;§
I -.-.5-J5
¢
';_ -
-I- -4
_.,.4Q. 1._su .1-4!U_ _- l __ _;__ _7____ __ iji _?1 V_____ ___ '
I? {D
NY 100-81752
United States District Judge LAWRENCE E.
WALSH on June 6, 1955, granted a Government motion to
consolidate for trial the cases of defendants BACHRACHTRACHTENBERG, cnasnsy, and swsxw and the trial was placed
on the calendar for June 14, 1955.
On June 14, 1955, the case was adjourned
until June 28, 1955, due to the defendants alleged
inability to obtain trial counsel. An adjournment to
June 30, 1955, was granted on June 28, 1955, and on
June 30, 1955, the trial date was set for August 10,
1955. Subsequent adjournments were obtained by the
defense on August,lO, 1955, August 2h, 1955, September T,
1955, September 20, 1955, October 3, 1955, November 21,
1955, November 25, 1955, and February 27, 1956, at which
time the trial date was set for April 9, 1950.
Fugitive FRED MORRIS FINE surrendered
to the United States Attorney, Southern District of New
York on November 30, 1955. and was immediately arraigned
before United States District Judge EDWARD WEINFELD where
he entered a plea of not guilty and bail was fixed at
$20,000. FINE's trial date was set for February 27,
1956, the trial date then set for the other defendants.
Fugitive. JAMES EDWARD JACKSON, JR.
surrendered to the United States Attorney, Southern V.
District of New York on December 2, 1955, and was
arraigned immediately before United States District
Judge wEINFELDvmere bail was fixed at $20,000 and
the pleading was adjourned until December 9, 1955.
JACKSON entered a plea of not guilty before United
States District Judge MURPHY on December 9, 1955, and
his trial date was set for February 27, 1956, the trial
date then set for the other defendants.
Fugitive WILLIAM NORMAN MARRON surrendered
to the United States Marshal, Newark, New Jersey, on
December 5, 1955, and was arraigned that same day before
2'
.~ -.3,~92¢;'
as
_¢="..
.-.'-- H 5 ~-at
=*1
.v._
92-_. ,-=, ..
.. _-_[
W, ., ,'3 H:-:ii, *5
J?.--. -..-,~'..- -7:-; »
.0-
I.~.
F
e -.. "92T _h
1 ,.
»
e,~
»-if, _._____~ ______________.__..-..._-_.--. *
C3 C!
I 51'
NY 100-81752 a5~
United States District Judge MURPHY,_Southern District of
New York, who fixed bail at $20,000, adJourned_the pleading
until December 12, 1955, and remanded MARRON to the custody
of United States Marshal, Southern District of New York.
MARRON entered a plea of not guilty on December 12, 1955,
and on December 22, 1955,an order was filed by United
States District Judge BICKS fixing MARRON's trial "
date as February 27, 1956, the trial date then set
for the other defendants.|
B. Attorneys
1. Government - "
From June, 1955 until February, 1956,
Special Assistant to the Attorney General DAVID H. HARRIS
was in charge of the case, assisted by Departmental
Attorneys BERNARD V. MC CUSTY, HERBERT SCHOEPKE, and
JOHN J. KEATING.
. From February, 1956 to date, Chief Assistant
to the United States Attorney THOMAS B. GILCHRIST, Jr. has
been in charge of the case assisted by Assistant United
States Attorneys MORTON S. ROBSON7 and WILLIAM J. ELLIS
and Departmental Attorneys BERNARD V. MC OUSTY, HERBERT
SCHOEPKE, and JOHN J. KEATING.
2 Defense
jria1*AQpearances
F _-0 ' ";1.-Defendants CHARNEY and TRACHTENBERG were
represented by Attorneys MARY M. KAUFMAN and NEWMAN LEVY,
New York, New York.
Defendants FINE and MARRON were represented
by Attorneys JOHN MC KIM MINTON and ARNOLD SAYER, New York,
New York.
- 30 -
--_ . __~_1___._T!I-I --I|- . - v~- ***'- * W"'v H--
_92F. 1-1- ;.-IA 1
25-4-1-
-.-n-_
'1
1: |-Q
. ;..| J1 ¢- :...~.- J -1
:."4i.
.- -z.-_,,_,. I
' II. 1
H?
1-"'15.";-E
%ss=
fa
-M-I
F H-
; i
=-K!
-, .;
Jr "T.
._.-iv, , __ _._,_. I i--5. -Q 7»; {Zn-I"' %v;. - 92-II:I rill!- 7..._,._.nuh.-up-w-In-~-I-"-*-"""$'-3'
- as fl?
NY 100-S1752
Defendant STEIN was represented by
Attorney ROYAL W, FRANCE, New York, New York.
Defendant JACKSON was represented by '
Attorneys CHARLES T. DUNCAN and FRANK D. REEVES,
Washington, D.C.
Defendant BACHRACH was represented by
Attorneys VINCENT HALLINAN,Ross, California, and ROYAL
N. FRANCE, New York City.
Other attorneys who represented defendants
during some of the pre-trial proceedings were: ROBERT
Z. LEWIS, New York City for defendant STEIN; REUBEN TERRIS,
New York City for defendant STEIN; EUGENE K. JONES,
New York City for defendant JACKSON; HARRY SACHER for
defendants CHARNEY and TRACHTENBERG; and JOHN ABT, New
York City for defendant BACHRACH.
C. Bail
1. Bond 0
United States District Judge NEINFELD on 7
April 22, 1955, set bail at $5,000 each for defendants
TRACHTENBERG and CHABNEY. This $5,000 bail ibr each
defendant was posted on April 22, 1955, by GRACE HUTCHINS,
85 Bedford Street, New York, New York.
On August 2h, 1955, a property bond of
JACOB L. CHARNEY was substituted for CHARNEY's bail.
The property of JACOB L. CHARNEY referred to in the
bond was located at 1Ao1-1no5 Wilkins Avenue and 859
Jennings Street both Bronx, New York. Defendants
TRACHTENBERG and CHARNEY appeared before the United
States Commissioner, Southern District of New York on
April 25, 1955, and executed their bail bonds.
- 21 -
-92
its-E
g-all-II
_
In-
. J5. e=a' .11:."§.
;92i..'-ls-r
¥.,
L-
.'-.
.
-.'.-
1. . -_
=1
-or
1
-e
G-
Qr
F¬:
I.-<i__ ___ i in _A, i _,i__ __ e -- - 5-$:: H *'*-|Li _w__ ___ ___ ,.-.__;ee, ,,i ~
92
ICT If?
NY lOO~81T52
DORIS B. FINE, ESTHER C. JACKSON, and
FRIEDA NORMAN, the wives respectively of defendants FINE,
gncxsow, and_MAHRON each posted $20,000 in United States
Treasury Bonds payable to bearer on behalf of these
defendants. Each defendant's wife was named as surety and
the bonds were executed before United States Commissioner
EARLE N.December
released
Southern
HERLANDSBISHOPP, Southern District of New York on
15, 1955, at which time the defendants were
from the custody of the United States Marshal,
District of New York.
United States District Judge WILLIAM B.
on September 7, 1955» denied a motion on
behalf of defendant STEIN for a reduction of his Smith
Act bail in this case from $50,000 to $1,000 and a
reduction of his bail in the Northern District of
California daring the appeal on his conviction for
harboring in that district. On October 2%, 1955,
a notice of appeal was filed in the United States
Court of Appeals, Second Circuit on this denial of
STEIN's motion to reduce his bail in this case.
The United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit ordered STEIN's bail in this case reduced
to $30,000 on March 9, 1956. Defendant STEIN appealed
this decision and the United States Attorney, Southern
District of New York was served on April 6, 1956, with
a copy of a petition for a writ of certiorari filed
by STEIN with the United States Supreme Court.
The United States Supreme Court denied
STEIN's petition on May 21, 1956.
On June 8, 1956, SOPHIE STEIN, the wife
of defendant STEIN deposited United States Treasury Bonds
in the amount of $30,000 with the United States District
Court Clerk, Southern District of New York as bond for
STEIN. This bond was executed by STEIN and by SOPHIE
STEIN as sunaty on June 12, 1956, and STEIN was released
.11; 1?-
..|- -
1'.
-. KI
§%§
-,-47,1
,4;--.
i;f-,1
'-- .-r-ii
-_--r. E.
..
. -..--.92.-- ..I. ._.. ,
-F
:-
J
L-<. 0 _
3
.4.
I _ _|
= ,
. 3'}
val
E_ .
~.r'
5- -.
Ir
'-.__-.11: _
ru|i_
,'.1lH.92_H__ ____ __, __ _,_ _ A. - ~,¢-u_ - =|lan- ~*i~**___,___ _ ~_,.:;,_ ll? 7, """"'
'3 O
NY 100-51752
from custody.ax that time,bail of $10,000 having been
posted in the Northern District of California on June 11,
1950, in accordance with a decision of the Supreme
Court reducing STEIN's bail in that proceeding.
As a result of the entry of a gudgment
of acquittal for defendant BACHRAOH on June 1 , 1956,
BACHRACHs bail was returned to Attorney JOHN ABT
for surety MILDRED S. ABT on June 22, 1956.
On August 2, 1956, the Government made
application before United States District Judge BICKS
for renewal of consideration of the Government's motion
which had been made immediately after conviction on
July 31, 1956, to increase the bail of defendants
TRACHTENBERG and CHARNEY. United States District Judge
BICKS ordered on August 2, 1956, that CHARNEY's bail
bex increased from $5,000 to $15,000 and that TRACHTENBERG's
bail be increased from $5,000 to $10,000. The order
required that bail for both defendants be posted by
h:OO p.m., August 6, 1956, or they would be remanded.
On August 3, 1956, $5,000 additional
bail in the form of United States Treasury Bonds was
posted by defendant TRACHTENBERG as principal, and
GRACE HUTCHINS, 85 Bedford Street, New York, New York,
as surety.
J
The bail bond of CHARNEY was_provided
August 3, 1956, by an increase on the property bond
of JACOB L. CHARNEY on the property previously described
in Bronx, New York. *4
2. Extensions
United States District Judge LEIBELL denied
on June 1, 1955, an application by BACHRACH for an
order to permit her to travel to East Blue Hill, Maine
from June 15, 1955, to October 15, 1955.
- 93 -
/-
AGI
,_ 1|:
--"1
t!
F
P . E
Fr;-'-<1
=1
T-2., :___
-:.r__..
T v
1':__ _ ________ ___ _ ,____.___¢.._ _ +_-
Cf: O
1 0
NY 100-B1Y52
United States District Judge EDMUND L.
PALMIERI on July 21, 1955, executed an order enlarging
the bail limits of defendants CHARNEY and TRACHTENBERG
to include the Eastern District of New York.
On November 111, 1955. uniuecl States
District Judge WEINFELD executed an order permitting
defendant CHARNEY to travel to Washington, D.C._£rom
November 15, 1955, to November 18, 1955, for attendance
at the hearing in the United States Supreme Courton
the Subversive Activities Control Board _citation of
the Communist Party, USA.
Defendants FINE, JACKSON, and MARRON
were granted an enlargement of their bail limits on
December 15, 1955, by United States District Judge
THOMAS F. MURPHY to include the entire city of New
York. In addition, defendant FINE was granted a
bail extension to include the city of Chicago and to
permit him to reside at 3022 Church Street, Chicago,
Illinois. _On January 12, 1956, United States District
Judge MURPHY filed an order requiring defendant FINE
to give three days notice to the United States Attorney,
Southern District of New York, of any travel between
New York City and Chicago.
Upon an oral application made
by defendant JACKSON to United States District Judge
BICKS, United States District Judge MURPHY on December 22
1955» granted permission to JACKSON to travel toI
Richmond, Virginia from December 22, 1955, to December 31,
1955.
Defendant FINE was granted permission on g
January 23, 195e, by United States District Judge BICKS
to travel to California during February, 1956 for the
purpose of visiting his parents and consulting with
WILLIAM SCHNEIDERMAN, a defendant in a previous Smith
Act trial at Les Angeles. This travel permission was
granted for the period February 3, 1956, to February 15,
1956.
_ gh -
Q-5--F
0.
=iu 1
¬.1
J:
.2 -
s i
.v.,~..92 ;r_.,,;_~'.,
_,-r
't§
Q5:
3e%ii?
qfq
1.
~-.._
S-':-t"-.'». ,_» ,.
!=*.%5§';§_ 112'
at
K
1.____ _________ _ _:__ _ V: I __ _ . _,W r-g-: ~
- CZ} O
1 ' 1' '
NY 100-81752
An enlargement of defendant JACKSON's
bail limits to permit him to travel to-Detroit, Michigan,
Richmond, Virginia, and Washington, D.C. during the
period February 27, 1956, until March 12, 1956, or on
such subsequent'date as the trial shall have been
scheduled to commence,was granted by United States
District Judge BICKS on February 27, 1956.
On March 13, 1956, United States District
Judge BICKS executed an order enlarging the bail limits
of defendant FINE to permit him to travel to Detroit,
Michigan between March 18, 1956, and March 2%, 1956, and
to Chicago, I11inois,,Minneapolis and St. Paul, Minnesota
between March 24, 1950, and April 7, 1956. This
order also incorporated permission for unrestricted
travel within Kings and Queens Counties, New York until
revocation or termination of bail.
Defendant MARRON's bail limits were
extended on March 13, 1956, by United States District
Judge BICKS to permit him to travel to Richmond, Virginia
from April 1, 1956, to April B, 1956, and to travel freely
within the Counties of Kings and Queens, New York until
the date of revocation or termination of his bail.
United States District Judge BICKS on
May 25, 1956, entered an order permitting defendant
JACKSON to travel to Richmond, Virginia on May 25, 1956,
and to return by 8:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time,
May 28, 1956, for the purpose of consulting with defense
witnesses.
In order to permit defendant CHARNEY to
confer with his attorney, NEWMAN LEVY at LEVY's summer
home, CHARNEY's bail limits were enlarged to permit him
to travel to westport, Connecticut and return on
May 26" 27, 0
An order was entered on may 23, 1956, by
United States District Judge BICK3, pursuant to an oral
-25-
;.¥, .
5.,i-'-I1- P
'1
,1.
i-"I
~»-1.
Ep-.'92 '_
-Q-
1, Ll.M3 '& . I
..' __~_
3:.
' .'-L1
3'-' ;:1i=~=,-::1-.-' *ld
éd?
¥Jre --
.__.-p-1
I
92. .-_,
ex-
. gs.
.-._.
' B2:
.7-
9'?
. I4-.I
92-._ .._________..__ __ _ ; 7 - ~ ~*- i*""'- '1 1¢ 5"""""" A: '_ I I "
'1? ff!
NY lOO8lTS2
motion, enlarging the bail limits of defendant BACHRACH
during weekends while the case was on trial to include
the towns of Kent and Westport, Connecticut and their
environs.
On June 7, 1956, United States District
Judge BICKS executed an order enlarging the bail
limits of defendant FINE to permit him to travel to
.Q1'|'nlrcw'92 T._.|'nQrqr921.IQ Dnvllr Hucunaq T'.nv92|-r T|:!'| an n .T'|'|1-an 1nwuaanvsa ll92vEb92-I-92!'IIl-I .Lu.|.;92.., avcsuuau, .u92-v4.45 A.u.J.c|.u92..l vs: um-uac -I-92-I,
1956.
United States District Judge BICKS on
June 15, 1956, executed an order enlarging-the bail limits
of defendants STEIN, FINE, and MARRON to include travel
within the Eastern District of New York. 5
On June 27, 1956, United States District
Judge BICKS executed an order enlarging the bail
limits of defendant JACKSON to include the Eastern
District of New Yorh. Defendant STEIN was granted
permission to travel to Worcester, Massachusetts during
the period from July l, 1956, to July 17, 1956, by
an order of United States District Judge BICKS on '
July 13, 1956, but STEIN did not use this travel permission.
On July 20, 1956, United States District
Judge BICKS signed an order permitting STEIN to travel
to Worcester, Massachusetts during the period from
July 21 to July 22, 1956.
Pit PP§:$?1al,M9t1°§_
A notice of motion was filed on June 2H,
1955, on behalf of defendant STEIN for the following relief:
1. An order dismissing the indictment
because the Grand Jury was illegally selected.
2. An order for a Bill of Particulars.
- 25 -
3-?
are
'.Z
.."¬i B
-as
e
_-V
92r9292 2'.*.'-'..92- -
m--
F. -I. .;;J
3f?_.y._~§
ass
f?
:4
...iv£'
--7. -4.
.--".5.2:__ M ____U____ :__ ____4 1 -- :I~ h.,|,-g5.g..¢~.|ni|h|-an:-Insist
- <I;= O
NY 100-Bl?52
3. A list of all witnesses the Government
expected to use in the trial.
4. Discovery j and inspection under Rule
l7C, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.
1
5. Dismissal of the indictment because
of the Communist Control Act of l95H.
6. Dismissal of the indictment because
he was not granted a speedy trial.
Oral arguement on this motion was held
by United States District Judge BICKS on July ll, 1955.
The application for an order dismissing the indictment
because the Grand Jury was illegally selected was with-
drawn and on July 26, 1955, United States District
Judge BICKS ruled, denying the entire application with
the exception of the rehef sought by STEIN for the
discovery and inspection under Rule 17C of the Federal
Rules of Criminal Procedure.
This latter rahef was granted insofar as
it pertained to all books and material used in the
case, United States vs. ELIZABETH GURLEY FLYNN, ET AL
and all other like material. The order stated that
production was not required of'any material which would
disclose the identity of a government witness.
A notice of motion was filed on August 3,
1955, on behalf of defendant BACHRACH for an order
dismissing the indictment as to her on the grounds that
she had already been acquitted upon all charges contained
in the indictment, had already been in Jeopardy upon
all of the charges, and that prosecution of her had
previously been abandoned and discontinued by the
Government. ' .
In connection with this motion,_Judge_
DIMOCK filed an order on August 5, 1955, unsealing the
- g7 _
-
bi.
., -._...1
I '92': "
:-.'>f92-':*7
;t§§
in-1: '._ -
'-'-'.' 3'-.".' : . ,1} " -v -
h
-2";-4
..92..
F53
ii: '-16E 1
--Inf
;,.
L.
3-,
.w
P F
, 5?.»-
L}
--m
;-,,.
I Ti-"W_-.
3
vi
s*1: L TI "A" i* " _ i ____ _ __. ...i_. ._-,_-4-7--a u-1:
- Li} C!
92
NY 100-81752
evidence, exhibits, transcripts, and all other material
having t0 do with the severance of BACHRACH's case
during the trial in July, 1952. On January 18, 1956,
an oral argument ' an
States District Judge
he denied the motion.
United
an orah. argument on
motions:l_92_¢I _ -___-92_-J _. -__@ I__;__iiI 92___ T'__4l
UH-LB IIIUUQLUH WEU5 H11 Dy UHJ-Ive
BICKS and on January 27, 1956,
States District Judge BICKS heard
December 5, l955, on the following
l. A motion by defendants CHABNEY and;
TRACHTENBERG for leave to inspect the Grand Jury
minutes and for dismissal of the indictment on the
grounds that evidence
sufficient to support
denied by Judge BICKS
1956.before the Grand Jury was_in--
an indictment. This motion was
in an opinion filed on April 2h,
2. A motion by defendants TRACHTENBERG
and CHARNEY to strike
n Rn 92.r4-I-In A-an-an-I planUV uv II'.l-VII. 92-VJ-6G-ll-J-40-I-115
alternative, an orderportions of the indictment having
the Communist Party or in the
declaring defendants CHARNEY and
TRACHTENBERG acquitted of this charge of the indictment
and withdrawing the issues raised therein from the
trialpof the case. This motion was granted in effect
by Judge BICKS on April 17, 1956, when he read the
indictment on voire dire and omitted those portions of
the indictment concerning the defendants organizing
the Communist Party.
3. A motion for pre-trial production and
inspection of documents under Rule l7C, Federal Rules
of Criminal Procedure. Government counsel advised the
court that the Government was willing to abide by the
court's previous ruling on . a similar motion by
defendant STEIN. The formal granting of this motion was
contained _in Judge BICKS' opinion filed on April 24,
1955.
- 38 -
f;§
}
.g,
q _
- .1
.!
2
_._
no
¢ 92.'
'-92.~~;'.'!-*:".:-I--- . ,.WA - -$1?-35,:
. ;_;_
3
ii
~:_,§.. W _
.> __..-1.1 _ _
.jv;92:_
rs 1
3.-
5."-T,
asP.
1 :
-in.4 "L_5' ' Q4. L.1|»;-
W1
1-1.---Q
.-.':
2
92._ _ _ _ i _ _A, iii? ._ -__.i- - -.___;,,_§_Qi__ -1;»- *_____:%*""" "
~ LI} O
NY 100-81752
4. A motion to dismiss the indictment
against defendants CHARNEY and TRACHTENERG on Constitutional
grounds. This motion was submitted without oral argue-
ment and was denied on April 24, 1956.
5. A motion for severance of defendants
TRACHTENBERG and CI-IARNEY from the trial of defendants
STEIN, FINE, JACKSON, and MARRON. This motion was
based on the ground that the Government would contend
in the course of the trial that STEIN, FINE, JACKSON,
and MARRON were fugitives from Justice which would be
prejudicial to defendants TRACHTENBERG and CHARNEY. This
motion was denied on April 2%, 1956.
6. A motion for continuance of the
trial until the Supreme Court determined the issues
raised in the petitionibr writ of certiorari in YATES,
ET AL vs. United States. This motion was denied on
April 2%, 1956.
7. A motion bi. defendant STEIN for
dismissal of the indictment on Constitutional grounds.
This motion was submitted without oral-=srgment and
was denied on April 24, 1956.
8. A motion for severance of the case
of defendant STEIN from the trial of defendants CHARNEY
and TRACHTENBERG on the ground that the previousconvictions of cawaway and TRACHTENBERG would be prejudiciél
to defendant STEIN. This motion was submitted without '
oral argument and was denied on April 2H, 1956.
United States District Judge BICKS on
February 2, l956,heardI srguent on motions by defendant
STEIN for an order striking out that portion of the
indictment charging STEIN with dissolving the Communist
Political Association and organizing the Communist
Party, and for an order dismissing the indictment against
STEIN on grounds of double Jeopardy. The first motion
' 29 P
I
ii
._1,.;l
-1
1
r".
.. -n"P
02:; '
§.. .
"?*7. "--' .1 :.1'=_-Z'-'."§92-' - r.-__, .. 1_, . _,
0.1
J;_ .. n
"~31
faI5»! Q-'3 '1'=-.7», 1.7;
M .
.~ .
,-.v<
Q1 1 "A A ~- -+~_;~--- 1..l-,*-"-1-III! 71- 1 ~' n * '_
If} 1:! _
NNY 100-81752
was granted in effect by Judge BICKS on April 17, 1956,
when he read the indictment on voire dire and omitted
those portions concerning organizing the Comunist
Party. _The second motion was denied by Judge BICKS in
an opinion filed_on April 2h, 1956.
United States District Judge BICKS on
February 24, 1956, executed an order permitting co-
defendants CHARNEY, TRACHTENERG, BACHRACH, FTNE, NARRON,
and JACKSON to visit defendant STEIN at the Federal
House of Detention, New York City, for the purpose of
preparing for trial.
On April 2h, 1956, United States DistrictJudge BICKS, after oral .8$gument held on February 27,
195 , denied the application of defendant JACKSON for
severance from the trial of the other defendants and
granted his application for an order permitting him to
Join in the motions filed by the other defendants.
Argument was heard by United States ,
District Judge BICKS on March 30, 1956, on s motion by
all defendants for a postponement of the trial until
sometime in the fall of 1956 on the ground that the
publicity resulting from the United States Treasury
Department's levying an attachment against the assets
of the Communist Party for taxes and seizure of the
premises occupied by the Communist Party on March 27,
1956, was of such an inflammatory and prejudicial
nature that defendants would be unable to obtain a
_ fair trial. This motion was denied on April 3, 1956.
Defendant BACHRACH's application for
severance because of poor health was denied by United
States District Judge BICKS on April 3, 1956, in view
of the court-appointed physician's finding Doctor
GEORGE THOMAS PACK! that BACHRACH was physically able
to stand trial.
-30-
=__-._.-w...._:-1-4 _ --4- - 66" W U"
L
,.~ 1.'. .=I -'ti, ,-.
=i"" e'ij
Q
f
IL
8
" 1
'-1
'..'
I 92 L :._»;="92-
Y ' .
'.:-.__
'1"
.%i
gs-Q?. '1':é'¬_<'- ::.-r~., W .
'? :l,=
.':f»_-
- v_i __ _ __i_ A . ..V._|---|.»?I- ---r *:__,* T7 -,,_, »~ -- :e:s_,-7- A~A;t"T ""4
Q. K!
NY 100-B1752
E. Trial
The trial began in the United States
District Court, Southern District of New York, on
April 9. 1956, United
BICKS prepiding._ The
peremptory challenges
in the selection of a
peremptory challenges
Jurors.States District Judge ALEXANDER
defense was granted twenty-two
and the Government was granted six
Jury. Each side was granted two
in the selection of four alternate
A The preliminary examination of the Jury
panel was conducted on April 9, 10, 13, 16, 1956, by
United States District Judge BICKS for the purpose of
excusing those who might suffer hardship from extended
Jury service in the case. On April 16, 1956, the
deense applied ier an increase in their peremptory
challenges from twenty-two to thirty-two and Judge
BICKS granted them twenty-eight.
During the voire dire on April 17, 1956,
Judge BICKS, in reading the indictment omitted the
paragraphs in it relating to organizing the Communist
Party and this constituted the granting of the previous
defense motion to strike those portions of the indictment
The voire dire began on April 17,
1956, and continued until April 23, 1956, when twelve
Jurors and four alternate Jurors were impanelled. The
twelve Jurors were as follows:
:5 Mrs. BEATRICE LOSHAK
33H west 87th Street
New York, New York
Housewife
JAMES J. MARNS
673 Union Avenue
Bronx, New York
Sales, A & P Tea Company
- 31 -
2 '5
. 1-
_ b
_ . ,1- __ _-Fix
?~.:_._
- 5- I
-
E5:41_*4
9;. ,1. I, 1:5
92;i_J
. I /I
-;'3
5
'92._r..
Q-
L-
..¢.'
92-_:,: N____ _______k _. -- --11.;-.1
92NY 100-81752
ALFRED 0. ZIEGLER
1427 Taylor Avenue- <5} O
New York 60, New York
Route salesman, Borde
WAYMAN L. COOPER
919 Lester Avenue
Mamaroneck, New Yorkn's
Machine operator, Arnold Bakery
Mrs. VIOLA ELIZABETH VENTURA
l866 Bronxdale Avenue
Bronx, New York
"Homemaker"
JAMES VILLAFANA
247 Nest 61st Street
New York 23, New York
Post Office Clerk, Un
Office, Morgan Annexited States Post
EEIGY M. B. CHAI~EERLIIv'
325 East 72nd Street
New York, New York
Salesman
THEODORE HOTALING
396 Sawmill River Roa
Hawthorne, New York
Route-driver, Borden-
GERARD LEROUXd
willow Brook
150M Metropolitan Avenue
Bronx 62, New York
Locksmith, Parkchester Housing
Mrs. FRANCES LOEWEHTH
M10 Central Park west
New York, New YorkAL
Houaewiie and clerk, Associated Hospital
Service of New York
- 32 -
S
24-it
.5,-
If
- ._._-on'.''1"I-Q _
17-"5 .
5
.11.!;»",f.92__..
IL ,-
92.
i -
,,' 1.
let
-;r
$
s.._. .._. ___ ~~ _ ____w_" H _ _ _ __ ._,,,_,__ -_-_1- n- + -in-n
C O
92
NY 100-81752
Miss MARY E. CASEY
326 West lhth Street
New York, New York
Bookkeeper, Consolidated Edison Company
MORRIS L. LEVY
5741 Post Road
Riverdale 71, New York
Manufacturer of blouses, Mayfair
Manufacturing Company
_. _ _. . . _ __ IThe fgyr alternate Jurors were as fol1ows:92none
serve
HAROLD TAYLOR
342# Gates Place
New York 67, New York
Serviceman, Consolidated Edison Company
Mrs. MARION JESSOP
75 Park Terrace East
New York, New York
Housewife
Mrs. FLORENCE CHAMBERS
6h west 93rd Street
New York, New York
Clerk-typist
ARTHUR CHARLES THOMPSON
308 East 209th Street
New York, New York
Maintenance man, Consolidated Edison
Company
Chief Assitant United States Attorney,
Southern District of New York THOMAS B. GILCHRIST, JR.
made the opening statement for the Government on April 30,
1956, Opening statements by defense counsel NEWMAN LEVY
end ROYAL N. FRANCE were made en April 3O, l956, the
_ 33 -
_, v.
'.'§-'.=- E-Ii;
I71;
-4
1;
_ i
,2
§,
'3?
. I
.3
-
- _-92' .. ~,
' .-Li;- __
T. '1'.:_ Z,
, H.-.
.--v
.7, I.--.Y.w0:,i_- R T V V - V::_ J __.__H u;,_____* ' 'f
- <3 ~f>
NY 100-81752
opening statement by Defense counsel FRANK D. REEVES wasmade on April 30, 1956, and on May 1, 1956, Defensecounsel VINCENT HALLINAN and JOHN MC KIM MINTON made theiropening statements. ~
The Government began presentationof its case on May 1, 1956, and used the following
witnesses:
Jozm LAUTNER I
J. E. MATTIEEJS
ROBERT PITCOFF
BERENIECE BALD?/.IN
WILLIAM JOHN 1-:I.'..cus
AMERICO FIORE
C-.l92.1'{FIELD mention
MILDPED BLAUVELT
DOIiO'I'H. K. FUT-IN sum
MARY MABKWARD
BAPLPRA HARTLE
LEOIJIDAS HAYNES
ANZELM czasnowsm
RALPH CLAYTON cLo1~r.'z, JR.
S'I'EPH.EN J. sczzsr/zmsxs
mo LANE KOHALL
MONA LUMER
I-El-FRY CAPOZZI
DANIEL J. WHITEHEAI!
CARRIE PATTEN
WILLIAM TIESS
JOHN KISSIK
ETILEL MC CALL
c0NsUELo LLOYD
CHARLES REGAN
PEARL KNEPPAR mm!
RA192ION.RUIZ'
sr. JOSEPH P. MC CANN
The Government rested its direct caseon June 6, 1956.
-.31.}...
I7"-T": Ia. . J92
_ A
e,»._
LP
_._
* *'_.,_
I
1
-r.v*-
ibi
. #7.'_'2
I.19%.-i
-:5, '
?i?;"5
1'- I a
:51 i;. 1 .
-5
. El
$3-. .'92-51'. - 0 __ _____ ,__ i ._ _._ _,_ _,____ _,__, _.,;-__~.__-_-_-_-e-._-.-~- -~ sea; ..4-In-I- '---I-L» ' - -~. _ . ....- e4-7;, I- --1'-I
a !! . i
no
1 F
NY 100-8175?
On May 2, 1956, United States District
Judge BIGKS had denied an application by defendants =
JACKSON and CIIARNEY to allow them to pfiocféd 1.n_I.f0rrna
pauperis and for an crder directing that they be »
furnished with a daily stenographic transcript. United
States District Judge BICKS ruled that they were not
entitled to proceedztuforma pauperis and he ruled that
defendant TBACHTENEERG pay one half the cost of a
daily stenographic transcript, the other half to be
paid by the Governmaht.
On June 12, 1956, defense attorney
CHARLES T. DUNCAN moved on behalf of all defendants to
strike certain portions of the testimony and other
evidence received during the presentation of the Govern-
ments case. This motion related to three general
categories of evidence:
l. Hearsay declarations of third party intro
ducod'through Government witnesses
2. Statements made by witnesses
themselves regarding things that they did or views they
expressed
3. Documentary exhibits introduced
through various Government witnesses
Defense Attorney MARY M. KAUFMAN
argued on June 13, 1956, that the Government had failed
to establish that the defendants interpretation of G
the principles of Marxism - Leninism was the same as
the interpretation given by Government witnesses and
by documents in evidence.
At that time Defense Attorney DUNCAN
moved to strike the entire testimony of Government Wit-
nesses ETHEL HG CALL and CDNSHEUDLLOYD on the ground
- 35 -
n ,
~§__ .-
-ii
.'_
iii
"0 -__
r -_-4
1
~.*92v.
_iI
Q 14'
I-lb 92 |'
.1 _'3
.1
. _,.
V '-In
-
1-,
'.;';=~_; :2
K 1.
Er;3
L
1..
-- -'192-
11;
*1
- e.5 '7
ere,
-$33,-:
r..._, .E1-'?""iv_
--'.r'-ii;
. i 1'
1-4
1.
P-1":
¥' ' s
A_ ___v ______ __? i:_ _,_i -V-_ , - _ ei hgiy _ -- -VI 1-, qr ____
. "1<_ L3
NY 100-81752
that there was no connection between the witnesses
. testimony and defendant JACKSON. This motion_was
granted by_United States District Judge BICKS.
On June 13, 1956, Defense
W. FRANCE argued that the Government had
that a clear and present danger existed.
Attorney BERNARD V. MC CUSTY argued that clear and
present danger was shown by evidence of Communist Party
teachings, aims, and objectives as well as the nature of
the Communist Party, USA,Attorney ROYAL
failed to show
Departmental
Defense attorneys moved on June lh,
1956, for a directed verdict of acquittal for all
defendants on the grounds of insufficiency of evidence.
On June 15, 1956, and June 18, 1956,
the Government argued in opposition to defendants
motion for a directed verdict. On June 18, 1956,
Defense Attorney MINTON moved that all testimony
regarding the flight of fugitives NORMAN and FINE 5
be stnbken since there was insufficient evidence to
prove flight. United States District Judge BICKS'
granted a defense motion to strike Government exhibits
138 and 160 warrant for the arrest of defendant
JACKSON and FBI Identification Record on JACKSON,
respectively!.
On June 18, 1956, United States Distriet
Judge BICKS granted the motion for directed verdict of
acquittal for defendant BACHRACH on the ground that
the evidence was insufficient to sustain a conviction.
At the same time he denied motions for directed verdicts
of acquittal for the other six defendants.
On June 18, 1956, United States District
Judge BICKS granted a defense motion to strike Government
exhibits 120, 121, and 122 relating to defendant MARRON.
These exhibits were introduced through Government witness
--
1-I _.
U I-.1
,r-1. ' -
Q.2..-at-.
as-if-:
-
-.1
5..
_~_ w.~ c___.,s
_" '-1!
1..-
-1v-. '<.~"-,3;;.-;fv.;;__:4.;-' 1tst
inn
-P.="f:...1~.
-' 1- ' an
.__-'
-
-
gr-P . 1'»;
ii;
"92-
.4
P"?-1:H 7_7 _ 7*i_ 7 _:i __¢_- kr;
. ""*.' '92/1, Q
NY 100-81752
CHARLES REGAN and consisted of Gomunist Party literature
obtained by REGAN at Communist Party Headquarters, .
Buffalo, Pew York. The defense began presentati0n'of
its case on June 19, 1956, with defendant CHAHHEY as
the first defense witness. Other defense witnesses were
as follows:
y} ~rr-92r|:92e~| 1: n-h -rnrn.-c92r9292921 01:: .- .-.-.J-I-, qJJ'al'Ll2nD DU H-A-U UHLIILDULI, D11.
of defendant J1 .CKSON!
DOXEY ALFONSO UILKERSON
DP. U, E. B. DU BOIS
IOMH DANIEL COKE
JOHN SOMERVILLE
SIMON W. GERSO]
At the conclusion of GERSON's testimony
9:?
. ti.
'r
-,
1 1-,
_i
-3
-47;-ii
P q _§;, L 7'-92
:-;'l292-
-st"-1.e=T-{$52 -..§ -. ,.: -.
edF!" 1
h,
.. ,_..H _.,.,..
l" Y
aw I1 Li."t
92._ -nr V
§
1Hm i: -Ai F-by W;ir*A A- Lt-r4T L-
-- ~ 2.1} 0
NY 100-81752
GARFIELD HERRON
DOROTHY K. FUNN SWAN
- MARY NARKUARD
ANZLEM CZARNOWSKI
MARLANE MAC LANE KOWALL
RALPH C. CLONTZ, JR.
CHARLES REGAN
STEPHEN J. SCHEMANSKE
Defense counsel agreed to accept in __
lieu of the presentation of these records a stipulation
setting forth payments to these witnesses.
On July 19, 1956, the defense rested
its case subject to submission of the stipulation of
payments made to Government witnesses. Defense attorneys
then moved for directed verdicts of acquittal for all
defendants based on grounds of additional evidence
that had been introduced by defense witnesses and on
all grounds previously urged at the conclusion of the
Government's case. These motions were denied by United
States District Judge BICKS. The court granted a defense
motion to strike all testimony relating to the filing
of the warrants of arrest, the arraignment,and date of
arraignment of defendants FINE and MARRON.
On July 19, 1956, the following
additional motions were denied by Judge BICKS:
1. A motion to strike the testimony
of Government witness CAPOZZIthstCAPOZZI had not ob-
served defendant STEIN at his residence,
2. A motion to strike and remove from
consideration of the Jury Government's exhibit 152
photograph of cabin where defendant STEIN was apprehended!.
- 38 -
i _ _T_i_ _,_ ___ _ i $_____ __;_, ___ _;____v;1I~l-I '- -*~' 7 7
¢,e
ii
-_.-.
.-
. :1
.1-3.1
. .§
.93
1/:1
fr .2
W.#1,.
1', *9,
'9
-.1
=2.1 .4
-1
_ 92_
.-.--3
- 1
F. 4e ...1- 1
-7-H
l
=5.1-.-'Q...
es.
.-, Q
1'_ _ 1 ._ - We-- -- pi|-;.n.gj_.11|- ;-%@-Z ___~ ___~ ___: ~i"1 "
."92' ' J a rK-.1
I .| 92
NY 100-81752
3. A motion to strike a portion of
Government witness FIORE's testimony. 7
' The Government agreed on July 23, 1956,
to a stipulation setting forth information that various
universities and libraries purchased the Harxist- "
Leninist classics. This stipulation was not used in
evidence by the defense.
The Defense accepted on July 25, 1956,
a stipulation by the Government setting forth payments
by the Government to witnesses LAUTNER, BALDWIN, HERRON,
SWAN, MAPJCWARD, CZARNOWSKI, KOUALL, CLONTZ, BEGAN, and
SCHEMANSKE.
United States District Judge BICKS read
into the record that he had found that a clear and present
danger existed at the return-jof the indictment in
June, 1951, United States District Judge BIOKS denied '
the Government's application for reinstatement of
testimony regarding the flight of defendant JACKSON
and struck from the record the entire testimony of
Government witness J. B. MATTHEWS. Portions of the
testimony of Government witness ROBERT PITCOFF and
Government exhibit eight testimony of defendant
TRACHTENBERG before the House Un-American
Activities Committee in 1939!.92
Defense attorneys began their summations
on July 25, 1956, and completed them on July 26, 1956.
The Government's summation was made by Chief Assistant
United States Attorney THOMAS B. GILCHRIST, JR. on
July 27, 1956. United States District Judge BICKS
charged the Jury on July 30, 1956, and they retired to
deliberate at 12:50 p.m.
On July 31, 1956, at 3:00 p.m. Forelady
BEATRICE LOSHAK announced the Jury had found all defendants
guilty as charged. On motion of Defense counsel the Jury
- 39 _
- -_ ._- .--IIIIQII- --W 7 W" "5 "' H 66: -__ ._ wean __..._... ~_|. . #1._ in-n_ **- 4' -P "
-er?
-1-
? E
t"
it
us ,
51*.
l-'
'.".~ 4 e
._..
. ,__;l
92'
,¢92.~;. .-*-»~ =-
$?g¢§:»§;
gigfr-i
F'.,a;". . _:
3
.,_
.__.
"_ ig-. "4
at:
ff! .
5;;
Ff?_ . _,_ A er -1,.¢1,_¢- _*-_-_ -A~ t _,IHII-I1""_I'-~' " __ _ _ -_- _ _ '5-1;
mu. ' Q2 ; I
NY 100-81752
was polled as to its verdlot and eaeh Juror responded
that he had found all defendants guilty.
United States District Judge BICKS set
September 17, 1956, as the date for sentencing and '
granted a defense motion to defer the filing of eddiionl
defense motions until the date of sentencing.
Theuiefense moved to continue all
defendants on their present bail pending sentencing.
The Government moved to increase the bail of all defendants
except defendant STEIN to $30,000 and to increase STEINs
bail to $50,000. The court granted the defense motions
to continue defendants on their present bail pending
sentencing.
On re-application of the Government on
August 2, 1956, United States District Judge BICKS increased
CHARNEY'S bail to $15,000 and TRACHTENBEHG'S bail t0
$10,000. ~
_ Pi -
j _._;~ i _? A i *4 7 i i 4 7 i i i M _
4-
~~~ rs J
O-0"
.v-F
1~¢ .-
=-' NY 100-81752
. LEAD
NEW YORK
., _
-IrAt New Y°El1i;e "E! 3°21?
WL11 follow and report sentencing
e and appellant proceedings.
1'-_7 '1 I
£"%_ __ L REFERENCE
rs
-._.-_1
r». .."-____,_¢-~'u. ;,92';.1.g» .- .37!1, &_, _
' I I;-' _ .4A%"w,J
aw '1 -
I4'1..
-g r 7-5X _ V." ,
nu?» -
I! -... _. i
._ .5iigh -
-in ,1-§"1:;1'
§' {-1.
;"I';'.'381-"? gr ski 3/2»/53 GW OJ -
ADMINISTRATIVE PAGE
_ #1 _
4-_- ==:'
ar
-p-
.-.1;
*'r.¢ "
5:»
'3'
.1-'15.-H,. , ,_
4,
?s.
a 1*--*3 --*_92.:'* liq
if ,-.
5;.
uni?
:1"
-
C
Q, ;
.4
15:
....92.
' 1-.-
~_=92
__.-3-92-J
,-- ','2; 0.~ -- 0;V I_ _ _._ _ __ ....__»:._-1.4: -7 ,.._-_-__1 rm.-_.---92...=-..._.-__ ~.-- - .....
.:..........-..* ,1 ' 1,
Ojce Memozndum ~ UNITED s'r1n"Bs GOVERNMENT
w - m=w.=r,rB1 00-72390! $1.11, Iovuber 20, 1956
q-zen . Legal mucus, London 00-1201! - I j -,7? 1I Q wlusc-r= unncibnss, with 0 _ _ . j_'§_94"R "%:'r:ra:1L sacvnm A -- -
... 1 . _ Rewlet 7/11/56 M 0 ' - - 7 - l
IIICB, this hatter I111 continue being carried pending 1na.ct1n. ' lél
<6! $2,;
°£j;§l§§¥<:y~ G. 5 . A1,":-I »te 0 Dec SS ' 0 0 A - ._, ° /2?; sf G 0 L 0 ;;iP-i?-?»a=' { " 92 1"!
w4'"°"..- ow> ~""w . I .1- NM _ W-.~.;-.*. 0 /o 0 -..-_-@;_'.'..':'~T_{"-'-?. <%_%,-.-.,921_T» _ @!RDEU ' 55 .
__ .-92 .0 .'1_-'. .- 9
_ ' _. ___._ __,we s9292°* 10 sec 4-1905 1
A L%;lV.;; 9/9/ 5 '2 DEC s
107" M - "28 ¢"" '
4/M0//4 92/0/J5 S
x, 0/WE
-1
_¥" *-I
u. _,-'
£4:-_.-~r,_ , r
- 3:-2¢'.-:7 -
.:,
I_1I92 92
8I'nn92|u:|=uIu4m._ u.
J Irn'E1=mL SECURITY c Pr -v-*YH"Q 92-
Q _ _ 1 _Remy1et 11/2B/56_._'; U
UACB this matter will continue being carried pending mactive.q
r;'j___ .7
-L 3 A -mt!:_;$3Jm .q-1| :<,1,L>J¢, ZI Oce M1rim1.m;.::;m - UNITED smiit G9
To _ Director, FBI 00-72390! /aw £1 DATE: lay 23, 1957
_;_=-5,;-,1-_,, 0 , Legal Attache, London 00-1201! Y! 0. Emu ET. 1L5. La _ - ' I , .
.- , - W3 . AITDIA JONES, with ases ,P_1,,§ 5Q1__}"¢IR$_/:1 / __ , - _ E _j _. ___ f___ ___'.'
-- , . I.""- '
92 . NWO <91: .1 " T2 B u:~:c92.nss92¥lE9 .
_ ~ H ¢-".'~31§r-1 guess snuwu cl M* <2! _ '7"<='.».>.-|92_..:920....~e~,b-;[&.§-""' nEc0RuEn-3r3*=§ Z="i% , Z1 5 7&1 '
1.: b_--3" -6 Ir ; V]/F , t_,,-V..;: ' _,_92'{§.-if.-' l$8-' /92 U 92 1 ~92 '9", 281961 1 [J ,, -92_F__ fl '1 , '6 /"*" t' MAY47 P 92 1{1_}192a§92s.921'92e-L1 ->9292 5 8° ; é " 0 -:-¢J;s- B » Q r__ FY xe'9292P" gin .é'§iiYd= °" 'go/*' 2 / 1§E>a;;.,i ~ f '4: §¢i Y1 ' fU
an cunm3
" _._ { -J ...,-2 -. 1' 3;.-'-J '_-- --- I-I" »--v ,- ~" ' ' - - i . -- '-' " ..~ .~" . -. o.92 .' .__ .92 :1.-'~ . ;-- 1 .. F." ,92 !92- . '¢,,--:92- '- - 1~'- -- 1 - - . . ... .-_, . . . ,- t . . _ . . _ _ ___ _ , _ _ ,_E ; H~ l - _ ____ - 92- 1 . ,.- ~_ - ,.,.-: 4»:-I.=> _-,1--..--1*, _..- 921_*- .7--. . _~- --J V. ._¢. 11"; ...'--- -- .- -- -- - . - '1.-'_r_ *-Jr".---=7-1'-.1_-.-_,*.. ' .---92~ i -.~ -:.-..»-'0. ~.,.* -~ -9. _ ,._ . - -A-__-,92--0 -. ~ ':--.-_--.==-- _.--_. W ' _,._ ~ ..92~ -C.-» -~ ~ .... -,-
+750 -7-79!
XXXXXX
XXXXXX
XXXXXX
FEDERAL BUREAU DF INVESTIGATION
FDIPA DELETED PAGE INFORMATION SHEET
Z2Page s! withheld entirely at this location in the le. One or more of the following statements, where
indicated, explain this deletion.
Bf Deleted under exemption s! ___ _ _ _ _ _ with no segregable
material available for release to you.
Cl information pertained only to'a third party with no reference to you or the subject of your request.
[:1 Information pertained only to a third party. Your name is listed in the title only.
[:1 Document s! originating with the following government agencyes! 7
__ _ _. _, , was/were forwarded to them for direct response to you.
Pagelsl referred for consultation to the following government agencyes!; ___~..~%a_=W_..__.
__ as the information originated with them. You will
be advised of availability upon return of the material to the FBI.
_._. Page s! withheld for the following reason s!:
[3 For your information: _ _
%FhE following number is to be used for retgrence regarding these pages:_ _ ... -0.. A A. .92 4 1.; .14-0
_l_QU-"1-L "AP/8-"-5'! ?_
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXE oanarao PAGEXS! §no DUPLICATION FEE X
XXXXXX X FOR THIS PAGE X
XXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXX
FBI/DO.!
9. 1*. P""
. .1-11* - '..:':Ojfitf M671 D 772 U TE Ll O'ER192g?.
Director, FBI 00-72390! on: Ila1rember_ 27, 1957
;+_-
_._;
.- 54 ff
.-1:1: ;1,'
'- Y¢§;;',
.. 1
'1--'.' '
1.._4._
_;'.' .-1
7: ---I-"I_!- "-_-
;;
.5. ,_'.
._ . ,:_.__-
. W
~ "-;.'.
Q-I. ..,_ i.-I: -_ -_--:13.
v-._~;.-:.-.:¢" 1 w... . . 5.
-I P Inf,"_§?3: ¬§ } _.~».;_.!.=-.;<.1><~;»{'41-__ .1 .,,_
.~~'~.'F. '1/-.'.._-_ .-:'T.92.¬', T . r 7- .. ~ 1--2
:@-_- 3.;
_ 4_- " <4.1". =1-'
'1-
.¢-.-Ilh f1-4 ,./#4
LB I ILggal Attache, London 00-1201! S
IBN S06 MN
gugjgcf UDIA JONES, I11-h 8.118598 _ dcJ F L 7 » A__ __ ;;,§c..:21
UACB this matter will continue being carried pending inactive,
Classmed by 4 5:5. av ZxerDT Fmm t ' O gogd mit Q 3QE1536 of Declas Iw-=H'»5F* Yf-558* "0 ..Z...._.7"3.'7.Z.?""* °
4-750 -7-79!
XXXXXX
XXXXXX
XXXXXX
FEOEBAL OIJIIEAU OF INVESTIGATION
FOIPA DELETED PAGE INFORMATION SHEET
Pageisl withheld entirely at this location in the le. One or more of the following statements, where
{-1-I-I A A I ' Fl-1 A 'I 4; nluuiu, ¬X|'.|131 14115 u¬1¬:,|Cu1.
l2/I!eleted under exemption s! ' I _.__________ with no segregable
Cl
U
Cl
Clmaterial available for release to you.
Information pertained only to a third party with no reference to you or the subject of your request.
Information pertained only to a third party. Your name is listed in the title only.
Docurnent s! originating with the following government agencyes! _
. .. __ . __ , was/were forwarded to them for direct response t0 you-
Pgell referred for consultation to the following govemrnent agencyes!; H.E__,_._____o
. We _ _ . __ , i__,_ _ as the information originated with them. You will
be advised of availability upon of the material to the FBI.
Pagetsl withheld for the following reason s!:
For your information:
l2/The following number is to be used for reference regarding these pages:
XXX
XXXX
XXXXXXI ° ° E '79~3"'°_ i =1? if to _
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX§ DELETED PAGE S! X
X no DUPLICATION FEE
x FOR THIS PAGE
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
FBI/DOJ
4-750 -7-79!
XXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXX
FEDEIML BIIRERU OF INVESTIGETIDN
FIJIPA DELETED PAGE INFORMATION SHEET
________ Page s! withheld entirely at this location in the le. One or more of the following statements, where
indicated, explain this deletion.
lzl/Deleted under exemption s! b l _ with no segregable
material available for release to you.
l::l information pertained only to'a third party with no reference to you or the subject of your request.
El Information pertained only to a third party. Your name is listed in the title only.
El Documenttsl originating with the following govemment agencyes! ___ , o,
o_ e _ _ _e 1 , was/ were forwarded to them for direct response to you.
Pagetsl referred for consultation to the following government agency/ ies!; l__._________
___ at _ ' __o as the information originated with them. You will
be advised of availability upon retum of the material to the FBL
i_ Pagetsl withheld for the following reason s!:
Cl For your information: _ _ _ g___
E/The following number is to be used for reference regarding these pages:
. '92!92, fl-r -2Qn,. on!
[J-J ll} JV»-J i i
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxX DELETED PAGEXS! §§No DUPLICATION FEE X
XXXXXX X FOR THIS PAGE X
XXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXX
Fl /DOJ
4-750 -7-79!
XXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXX
FEBEB-ll. BIJREMI OF |lWESTlGlTl0Il
FOIPA DELETED PAGE IIIFUBMIJIOII SHEET
i Pagelsl withheld entirely at this location in the le. One or more of the following statements, where
material available for release to you.
El
Cl
Clindicated, explain this deletion.
Deleted under exemptionlsl b l _ with no segregable
Information pertained only to a third party with no reference to you or the subject of your request.
Information pertained only to a third party. Your name is listed in the title only.
Document s! originating with the following government agencyes!
T7 _. ._ , was/ were forwarded to them for direct response to you.
i Page s! referred for consultation to the following government agencyes!; +m..aa,.mn_m.mm____,.n.n
ft 7 77 _ as the information originated with them. You will
be advised of availability upon return of the material to the FBI.
_._i Page s! withheld for the following reason s!:
El For your information: _,_,,_ ___ _ y __
1
l]/The following number is to be used for reference regarding these pages:
XXXXXX
XXXXXX
XXXXXXzoo-7.>.r>°l0-NF> I-P115? __ - _
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
osusrso PAGE S! §
NO DUPLICATION FEE X
X FOR THIS PAGE X
_ __ Y __ X . - XXXXX
FBHDOJ
-V I77_. '-_92TT:.- - *1; ii-
.+_ '' '.'_-:-:u_..
.i:|_.<=
. ' _."T-1
-' "In" 1, -1 i. $5.4.Q1; _.'
*1..' 3-,4."5
1'
.9».
. Hz,-"'
LL??? -'= .1-tad"
:., .'- '--=92-.-"vs; .3. -2 -17...- 92l':i-;?'~J" E?+1»-?&=z§$:§
L"! 5:.
. . rt-,_,_ 92_1.:-.* ..
5:5
.4?
Q .
' . r
r
,.,?
- v-I _
_ . __;_
1?- _~
1.--1.?-ti
I
>-
.
"i
¬_ ._i, ~= - _ __=f____A_ ___ " 4' -n-1-1:-_ #1 _-
F!-35 F V. l2l3-55!92 I92
' - 5IQ. '-. » Y OFBI I"
Date: 8 1 61 3PLAIN mm /1 / 7}Transmit the foilowinq In i _p_ /J4p n plain Bast or c c! I W i
Via W Q _,p_ i__ _ i _ _ __. ' _p I
Priority or He d nfldilillgl
AIRTEL nscxsrsnsn HAIL
J 1'0: nmscmon, FBI i ,|-19°!-1/ FROM: sac, summons 00-Dead!umunn germs - __ ,1,13 .. c _ -'.1-3-1'.-5
O0: New York --"h'L"" ~ ' - -
-Enc1osed"forthe Bureau, New York, and Lega, London,I are appropriate p es ofia letterhead memorandum, suitable fordissemination. wo, > M; . C
/ - isIn the event any infonnati'on in the attached letterhead
; memorandum is used in areport, it ahould_be paraphrased in sucha way as to completely protect informant ' - H
eau E1101;/g! <R:;i.3s. 1 e i"?$ E:;:§eZ%Rb W-"' ,,» 8.80-Dead& q;!é?_ __ ._ .51/ ___ I
1
$315 AUG 12 1961
M 92_TT"E;uEIIrwmm 1. I 0 ,r,Egl rs wzcmséffarnm [J3 j_._ . __;-;- {st_.92.'ED /_ I -2sEa$$mW S as We '- _, ~ ' Classufmd .5; . ,.1 <3
4-750 -7-79!
_/-FEDERAL BIIBEMI DF IIIVESTIIMTIDN
FOIPA DELETED PAGE NIFDRPMTIDII SHEETXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXX
Page s! withheld entirely at this location in the le. One or more of the following statements, where
indicated, explain this deletion.
/ rl] Deleted under exemption s! b _ _ __ _ __ _ with no segregable
El
[I]
U
1:2
E1
XXXXXX
XX.Y. XX
XXXXXXmaterial available for release to you.
Information pertained only toa third party with no reference to you or the subject of your request.
Information pertained only to a third party. Your name is listed in the title only.
Do-cument s! originating with the following govemment agency ies!
____ ,__,_,_,_ _ , was/were forwarded to them for direct response U0 you.
Page s! referred for consultation to the following govemment agencyes!; __i___.___c.i.._._._m..___l_.__
_ ._ E __ ___ as the information originated with them. You will
be advised of availability upon return of the material to the FBI.
Page s! withheld for the following reason s!:
For your infonnation: _ _ _
The following number is to be used for reference regarding these pages:
1oo"7.,923q0 - ave W W
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
DELETED PAGE S! §
NO DUPLICATION FEE X
X FOR THIS PAGE X
. Y .. Y .. Y . - XXXXX
FBI/DOJ
4-750 -7-79!
XXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXX
FEDERAL BUREAU OF 1llVE$TlGlTlDN
FDIPA DELETED PEGE IHFDRHATIDN SHEET
__._._._ Page s! withheld entirely at this location in the le. One or more of the following statements, where
inriinnfnri nvnlnin H-iii: rlnlc|finn_ 11 man u92./ml 92..n|.uu | uuu IJ92Il92tIl 921
bl|%Deleted under exemption s! with no segregable
material available for release to you.
[:1 lnformation pertained only to'a third party with no reference to you or the subject of your request.
E Information pertained only to a third party. Your name is listed in the title only.
E] Document s! originating with the following government agencyties! ,,
__ , was/were forwarded to them for direct response to you.
_.___. Pagets! referred for consultation to the following government agencyes!; ii
_. *a,.____*_ as the information originated with them. You will
be advised of availability upon return of the material to the FBI.
...__i Page s! withheld for the following reason s!:
[:1 For your information: _,,, ____ _,_ _
{The following number is to be used for reference regarding these pages:
-. 1 h .. fl; Jan 1 n /1
IUU '° ""__',-Lf, ""', elf, ,m " ,_ ,
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxX osurrno PAGE S! §
§No DUPLICATION FEE X
igggggg x FOR THIS PAGE X
XXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXX
FBI/DOJ
4-750 -7-79!
XXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXX
FEDERAL BUREAU DF INVESTIGATION
FDIPA DELETED PAGE IIIFDBMATIDII SHEET
4
E Page s! withheld entirely at this location in the le. One or more of the following statements, where
indicated, explain this deletion.
BK Deleted under exemption s! __ _ __ _r___ _r with no segregable
material available for release to you.
[:1 Information pertained only to'a third party with no reference to you or the subject of your request.
, atron pertained only to a third party. Your name is listed in " "
Cl Documentlsl originating with the following government agencyes!
__ " r , was/were forwarded to them for direct response to you.
i Page s! referred for consultation to the following government agencyesl; ne
__,r_r_r g_____ as the information originated with them. You will
be advised of availability upon return of the material to the FBI.
E Pagets! withheld for the following reason s!:
E For your information: _ __ __ __ H ____
.:_-',_ _. _'_- -'2? . an-
- ,;__1:_
iee-Q:4. '.;_=~=___, - 1
v
i.3_-
*2?-T
..92 _ '
*- " 1*._ .-,....._.... ,_.'..- .1-t .7 J!-1-1--_-"a'~, 1* =_,..
-_ 4
'¢ -.5: -" ,I'..=L--"§:I'~ =-~.92- "F -.-'-..'-'--g
%%§;25L@-.1-1--'3-2-."-7<L=~?}.-J1/"12.;-;--,<.**.i*
Y-._ - .¢.:n._-_:~'- ' 7:. _ -,1-¢,~; . .--"titty ;-¢- '.'--e~q,,.=._..LQ __;-_ -J-* '
_-___ :1-3..
I-I ; _;'- "re ." -1- _. ...»
"' _% 'J ". " -s
. "=-3* .'-
... J ~__- E
Iat . . "»1- .
_, 1'
- "-, n ,4 -- --*
i Ii,-in.s':3_ f __E__'T-
1;:--"'_.,-*T*il.,".,
' ' ' J
' :-_ _,_ 4: _._.--.__- .-_._.....,_..._.¢:':_ ti- -;_ i_ A , __ Ak - _ .. _-::_____
[ o
g 5/5W. - ~ DUNITED srxms -1-_vmN'r 1 5
¢,Mem0r¢...m;m M» _
100 72390! ' mm: 2/25/65 go : Director, FBI -
92 u 92on : Legat, Lpndon 29-1201! RUC! .. A-
sunyzcr: CLAUDLS JONES, was. - " _ - .-,_ C " ' V -ES ___ Y 1? .-00: Iew oi'k =»
'.i
Remylet 2/4/63
Above is submitted for information. -1/1
7 ' NE&4*-"" ALE 92NFORh1lT92BN CONT?-13 _,. Bureau HEBFJN IS u-:4cLA§j$j*F}§>,;. -../1' - Liaison sent direct! ;;;;g5?T 921'HERE.Su_u92u;.__io _
1 - London .-3;-;.;E;2_'-,=1§E"E _ _
Classified by »_. I _ A A_A[Z._____ Exempt From GS 0 ego =3...I5 P*°" Date of Declas If . |n- ndenib
action .._.é'.' t e ,,,, ,, mi? ; o
é .
$9 -Qo / 0-'7» ..;2O/£5 -® 0 ~iF¬?.t§gE1- F ,=;;-;f;3,,1.=°m ,1» 4; 55> MAR 1
LPONF rmW 3 "* H4 .2: 1.!!-I o }%.¢ !»"
7