Document text
0 of 3 Premium Clicks used this month SUBSCRIBE Print + Online Subscriber Activation | Register x Forgot Password | Need an Account? e-edition | subscribe | newsletter | deals Classifieds Jobs Autos Real Estate FEATURED » NEWS NOW Our View: Highway 62 bypass — just get it done ... Cooking up some fun ... After six years, wilderness trail is open ... Our View: Highway 62 bypass — just get it done ... Cooking up some fun ... After six years, wilderness trail is open ... ANOTHER VIEW Michael Gerson: Two cheers for Obama, not three Comment MailTribune.com Writer Posted Oct. 3, 2014 at 12:01 AM Posted Oct. 3, 2014 at 12:01 AM » Social News It is a long, long way from the "JV team" to the "network of death." It is even longer from the arguments of President Obama's 2014 West Point commencement address — which ridiculed "tough talk," criticized a "military solution" in Syria and ignited various straw men of military adventurism — to the substance of Obama's 2014 United Nations address. It is the remarkable shift between the speeches — separated by four months and many ideological light-years — that is historic. Conservatives who obsessed about the reference to Ferguson, Mo., in Obama's U.N. remarks managed to miss a herd of charging, trumpeting elephants in the room. The president used the General Assembly's green marble backdrop to assert: (1) That global order is under mortal, unappeasable threat from jihadism; (2) that America has an indispensable leadership role in confronting the disorders of the Middle East; and (3) that a comprehensive response to jihadism will include the military pre-emption of emerging threats — in this case, conducted by a coalition of the willing without United Nations approval. And the United Nations applauded. For the first time during his stewardship of the war on terrorism — or whatever it is called nowadays — Obama at least sounds single-minded. If not quite Henry V, he is no longer Hamlet. Having settled on a strategic approach in Iraq and Syria, Obama seems anxious to explain it, rather than to hastily move on to domestic matters. What he describes is a phased, multi-year approach. America is disrupting immediate threats to the homeland, both from al-Qaeda-related terrorists (such as the Khorasan group) and the Islamic State. Having helped secure a measure of legitimacy for Iraq's government, the Obama administration is attempting to build up ground forces where they can be found (or recruited) — the Iraqi military, the Kurdish peshmerga and national guard units from Sunni areas. Since efforts in Iraq cannot succeed with an Islamic State safe haven next door in Syria, America (with the helpful veneer of an Arab coalition) is using airstrikes to "degrade" enemy forces across the border, buying time while non-Islamist Syrian opposition forces can be trained (overtly by the Department of Defense and covertly by the CIA). The objective: Roll back Islamic State forces in Iraq over the next year or so while building capacity in Syria. If, at that point, the Islamic State is retreating and off balance, Syrian ground forces might begin to operate effectively with U.S. air and (perhaps) Special Operations support. For Obama, the most surprising element of this strategy is something he didn't say. Uncharacteristically, he did not set a deadline for the completion of military action. The administration knows this will be a long fight. Much of this strategy remains inchoate, and questions are alarmingly easy to raise. Can the Iraqi government actually function? Will the Syrian rebels cohere? Are the proposed means sufficient to the stated ends? Putting such issues aside (which a columnist has the luxury of doing), it is an unreservedly good thing that the president is no longer living in denial or seeking excuses for retreat. Two cheers for Obama. So why does he make it so hard to give a third? Policy is only one element of leadership. In explaining his approach, Obama has a number of unfortunate and (apparently) unbreakable habits. He has a maddening tendency to describe the events of his own presidency as if he were a spectator or commentator. As the Islamic State rose, Obama recently told CBS' Steve Kroft, "they underestimated what had been taking place in Syria." They? He talks as though his past judgments were infallible, even though his current strategy consists mainly of measures — arming the Syrian rebels, bombing in Syria, strengthening Iraqi institutions — that he had previously ignored, dismissed or mocked. Through delay, all are now more costly and less likely to succeed. And Obama remains reluctant to level with Americans about the nature of American involvement. First it was "no boots on the ground" — though we have 1,600 and counting. Then it was no "combat mission" — which seemed (absurdly) to prevent the use of special forces. Most recently, Deputy National Security Adviser Tony Blinken ruled out a "U.S. ground invasion" — leaving monumental wiggle room. Rather than downplaying American risks, Obama should be explaining why they are worth taking. These are more than quibbles. But the two cheers are genuine. We need the determined, unfamiliar leader who spoke at the U.N. to succeed. Michael Gerson's email address is [email protected]. MailTribune.com Writer Posted Oct. 3, 2014 at 12:01 AM » Comment or view comments Reader Reaction » STAY INFORMED Email NewsLetter Sign Up Today Sign up for our newsletter and have the top headlines from your community delivered right to your inbox. Southern Oregon Directory Featured Businesses Loading... Business Name address Location, ST | website.com Find Southern Oregon Attractions Bars Restaurants Beauty Salons Entertainment Doctors Medical Specialists Contractors Education Lawn Services Lawyers Shopping Travel Tanning Used Cars Wedding Services ▼ Add your business here + Events Calendar Connect with MailTribune.com Facebook Twitter RSS Back to top Reader Services Reader Services Home Subscriptions Subscriber controls Contact us Submissions Photos Events Letters to the editor Corrections Announcements Obituaries Story ideas Since you asked Alerts Email Alerts RSS Feeds Text Alerts Advertise Media Kit Home Products and services Ad rates Advertising contacts Propel Marketing Mail Tribune Daily Tidings The Nickel Shop Our Valley Blogs Mobile Site Stay Informed Email newsletter Sign Up Today Sign up for our newsletter and have the top headlines from your community delivered right to your inbox. Your privacy is important, read our privacy policy. © Copyright 2015 Local Media Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Local Media Group Publications Original content available for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons license, except where noted. MailTribune.com | P.O. Box 1108, Medford, OR 97501