Dr. Robert Malone on WHO Amendments (Tony Perkins)

Document text

Dr. Robert Malone on WHO Amendments (Tony Perkins)
YouTube video by Dr. Robert Malone (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ESB_zEalX4). Transcript is the auto-caption track — verbatim ASR, not a certified transcript.

Dr Anthony fouchy the former head of the National Institute of allergy and infectious diseases testified before the house oversight and accountability select subcommittee on the Corona virus pandemic yesterday now throughout his time before the subcommittee he both downplayed his influence on government pandemic guidance and denied that he sought to cover up investigations into a lab leak causing as the origins being the origins of the pandemic now despite the fireworks throughout the hearing did Dr fouchy deflect accountability or did we come any closer to getting answers well with me now to talk about this is Dr Robert Malone chief medical and Regulatory officer for the unity project and internationally recognized physician scientist who specializes in advanced development of medical counter measures to infectious diseases Dr Malone welcome back to Washington watch good to have you thank you for having me on Tony I hope you're doing well I'm doing quite well thank you I want to get your thoughts on Dr fouche's testimony yesterday in particular that he acknowledged that some of the dictates evidence yes so uh in particular the six- foot distancing but uh throughout all of this what was clear in Dr fouche's testimony was number one that he had been very well coached uh this was extremely smooth presentation uh we saw an a Shooks uh down home Tony that I uh have never seen it's not his real personality and we saw very skillful deflection and blaming of others in the case of these things like the six foot distancing mask usage Etc he put the blame for these policies that were he acknowledged were not based on science directly on the CDC and by inference on Bob Redfield who uh he does not get along with uh the the whole exercise of his presentation was fascinating to watch uh from the agulation uh that was given by particularly the Democratic side um painting him as a hero through uh the uh very collegial friendly kind of chummy uh conversation that he had with the Republican uh Council towards the end he made a number of statements in which he threw people under the bus basically uh and notably uh this gentleman Dr Moren right who has the title of being a senior adviser to Dr fouchy had been with Dr fouchy for decades um if you believe Dr moren's emails they have a close workking relationship see each other regularly it sounded like at least on a weekly basis Dr moren's has the ability to visit Tony and his home and pass documents but Dr fouchy basically acted as if he hardly knew him and uh said that the title of senior advisor was really just basically honorific uh it was just a particular governmental title it didn't really mean anything in terms of the relationship with bouchi and yet we have this series of emails in correspondence between Mr daik uh a kind of a intermediary at Boston University and Mr Morin's Dr moren's in in which uh Dr Moren is relating to Dr dazak conversations that he's having with Dr fouchi on a regular basis um down to the level of granularity of talking about Dr fouchy getting rather colorful in his language when he's expressing his sympathy for Dr dazak and all he's been through but Tony acts like Tony fouchy acts as if he hardly knew the guy this is just not credible based on the emails he also uh said that if the great barington declaration had been adopted I believe he said there would be a million more deaths that's completely at odds with the data and remember that the great barington Declaration was basically a restatement of what had been US government and wh policy up until the point when the US government adopted and who adopted basically the cccp solution uh but uh Dr fouchi uh in in his efforts to defend himself uh basically said that the authors of the great barington declaration uh would have caused a million deaths if they had had their way with people uh again striking example of Dr fouchy just going um aggressive directly against people that were saying things that were inconvenient for him this happened all the way through the testimony but he did it with a smile so let me kind of dig down on that Dr Malone to to see kind of what's behind this because when you look at the consequences and and and he you know putting on that different front maybe it's designed to just make this thing go away they can move on but there was some acknowledgement that there were consequences non-public Health consequences to the decisions for shutdowns and such but I don't see any evidence to suggest that any in the scientific field there or here in Washington are acting upon that information in fact you've been tracking the World Health Organization it looks like they're trying to cement into concrete everything that was done wrong during the covid-19 pandemic uh into marching orders for all member states cement and more really further expand uh Dr Tedros uh Power to act unilaterally and uh there's some new Clauses in there about the importance of uh nation states building capabilities in their communication systems for public health to counter Miss and disinformation there two separate statements in I think it's Annex number one right what was particularly striking about what happened in Geneva and of course I was there because I was involved in a conference that was being held simultaneously and then a protest that was held last Saturday against the World Health Organization in front of uh the UN building but uh what was remarkable was that the this um meeting of the World Health assembly which is an annual meeting of representatives from all the nations states that are members of the World Health Organization signatories uh they have uh rules about adoption of new regulations or modifications to these International Health regulations IHS and uh that requires that they complete the draft and then allow the nation states for months to review them but instead what they did is they literally worked late into the night behind closed doors to come up with these modifications to the IHS and then pass them by acclamation no actual vote uh I hear the rumor was that they even turned off the microphones uh for many of the nation states so that they wouldn't interfere in the discussions of uh among those that are were empowered to participate uh this type of unilateral Behavior Uh really arrogance seems to be typical of the World Health Organization under Mr Tedros gabos Dr Tedros uh and uh that is a another reason for serious concern about these policies that are being put in place because he's been given a lot of power he basically is completely unaccountable to anybody that's elected so let me ask you about their procedures that require these to be published in advance so that the member states can review them is there any enforcement mechanism that would require them to adhere to these stated guidelines and procedures only in the sense that if they fail to comply with these agreed upon procedures then uh multiple International lawyers uh from the UK us and elsewhere have asserted that that would make any product work product coming out of their deliberations literally illegal uh it would have no uh weight in terms of international law which is what they're trying to uh Advance is basically a treaty this uh International Health regulations is functionally a treaty and uh so by violating the rules that have been agreed upon by the member states and uh proceeding with this by acclamation rather than an actual vote and I understand that uh at least five nation states subsequently objected to this even though they asserted that it was uh unanimous uh that makes the document uh um not legally binding that's that's the enforcement is that if this was taken into International Court it would it wouldn't hold up so that that would be the remedy then for those concerned about this it would have to go to the international court and be challenged would it have to be by one of the member states who opposed or do individual citiz yeah no member states would be the ones with standing but I'm not a lawyer I'm not an international lawyer but that's my understanding what we have so that's one remedy and and that's obviously challenging and time consuming the other one has been really piloted by the state of Louisiana in which uh uh States within the United United States you know we're focused here on ourselves have uh the state of Louisiana has passed legislation that says that they will not abide by the dictat of the World Health Organization and by the US Constitution uh the right to regulate the practice of medicine is not assigned to the federal government and therefore vests to the States but this sets up is a constitutional crisis because these are being treated as treaties even though the Senate has not reviewed and approved uh and so that gets into some really dicey issues with the Constitution about the Primacy of the Constitution relative to any International treaties that are agreed upon by the executive branch this turns out to not be entirely clear in in the US Constitution as well because no one envisioned that we would be marching down this path to Global governance which is exactly what this this is I we just have a couple minutes left Dr Malone I want to I want to go back to and these two issues are very relevant to what Dr fouchy had to testify before committee uh yesterday and the World Health Organization because what we what we saw during the covid pandemic and what the bite Administration did as you talked about restricting uh communication setting up these systems by which it could be suppressed um the mandates the the closures the masking all of these the vaccinations vaccine cards vaccine cards are included digital or paper we we don't have any evidence to suggest that all of these things worked in fact in some cases it's contrary thank you Tony um yes I could I I could reach out and hug you for saying that uh precisely uh as you point out they're doubling down on failed policies and the L IC is that somehow the World Health Organization with all of its self- congratulation has has done a good job during this and that's absolutely not the case but the logic is they've done such a good job that they deserve more power more Authority and uh more Capital so is so I I want to go back to ear my earlier question is was this the coaching for Dr fouchy knowing that you he represented what the who is after after and so he needed to come in before committee and deflect it and not be combative hoping this will go away so the world World Health Organization is able to advance their agenda I I uh I wish uh I could endorse that Dr fouchy had such a global long range view my personal bias is that Dr fouchy is mostly focused on Dr fouchy and evading accountability for his role in the mismanagement of the covid crisis he showed all the signs of somebody who'd been carefully prepared as one does for instance if you're going into an expert witness situation against hostile lawyers and uh um came came across very effectively uh with this uh as Shu down home kind of tone which was uh contrasted with an audio clip that was played by one of the congressmen one of the uh Physicians who practiced uh during the covid crisis practiced emergency medicine and he played a clip in which Dr fouchy was being extremely aggressive in an interview stating that basically it was going to be necessary to force people to take the vaccine right by uh withdrawing their ability to earn a living uh um and support their families uh as a way to overcome their ideologic uh issues um with taking the vaccine as you know one of those ideologic issues is uh religious exemptions right right which they completely swept just swep aside Dr Malone we're out of time uh always great to talk with you thanks so much for uh joining us today thanks for having me on Tony