Transportation System Plan 2018-2038

Table J-1 Continued TRP Implementation Measures Issue TPR Citation Medford Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Code Off-site Im provem ents 045 (3) (c) 10.291 – Could be im proved Internal Pedestrian Circulation 045 (3) (e) 10.772-10.776 - Adequate Design Support for Transit Routes and Transit Access 045 (4) (a) and (5) (d) 10.806-10.808 - Adequate Preferential Carpool Parking 045 (4) (d) 10.809 - Adequate Transit Oriented Developm ent 045 (4) (g) and (5) (a) 10.235 and 10.270 – Could be im proved Dem and Managem ent Program 045 (5) (b) RVTD Program – City could take action to improve com pliance Parking Plan 045 (5) (c) 10.741-10.746 – Not Adequate Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan for Developed Areas 045 (6) Included in TSP - Adequate Street Standards 045 (7) Included in TSP - Adequate Land Use Approvals for Transportation Projects The TPR [ 660-12-045(1)] requires that local governm ents am end their land use regulations to implem ent their adopted TSP and to clarify the land use appr oval process for transportation-related projects. Medford does not specifically identify transportati on projects as perm itted or conditional uses in its zoning. Each zone should allow transportation im provem ents listed in the TSP as an allowed use. The residential use table does perm it pedestrian, transit and bicycle facilities as an allowed use. Additional provisions for transportation projects not in th e TSP could be m ade with the developm ent of corresponding criteria. The LDC does include a provision in 10.205 that indicates that “land use issues decided at the tim e of approval of the TSP do not have to be reexam ined at the tim e of project developm ent.” This section does not appear to m eet the full intent of this TPR requirem ent. Suggested Code Language Add a section to both the residential and com mercial use tables that perm its the following use: • “Transportation projects that com ply with the Transportation Sy stem Plan.” J-2