IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISI4N)A
RECEIVED
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISI4N)A
DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN z 4 2017
DUDLEY, TOPPER
AND FEUERZEIG, LLP
1000 Froderksberg Gado
em 766
Thorn's, U.S %U. 00&34-0756
0.40) 774.4422 LSJE, LLC
Plaintiff,
v.
BETTEROADS ASPHALT
CORPORATION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. ST-16-CV-615
THIRD-PARTY HEAVY MATERIALS, LLC'S NOTICE OF REMOVAL & DISPOSAL
Heavy Materials, LLC ("Heavy Materials") —the prior landlord of Defendant, Betteroads
Asphalt Corporation a/k/a Betteroads Asphalt LLC ("Betteroads")—respectfully notifies the
parties and the Court that it intends to remove and dispose of the asphalt plant ("Plant")1 which
still remains on Heavy Materials' property located in Estate Bovoni, St. Thomas ("Premises")
over five (5) months after Betteroads' month-to-month lease of the Premises ended.
Betteroads' failure to remove its property, including the Plant, from the Premises
necessitated the filing of a forcible entry and detainer action by Heavy Materials to establish its
right to restitution of the Premises. On December 8, 2016, the Court entered judgment granting
Ileavy Materials the right to immediate restitution of the Premises. A copy of the Judgment is
attached as Exhibit 2. The Court's order correctly stated that "removal or disassembly of the
asphalt plant on the premises is really an issue for which Defendant [Betteroads] is responsible,
unless the parties can arrive at a mutually satisfactory agreement to resolve same." See id. at p.
3. Subsequent to the entry of the Judgment, Heavy Materials made multiple requests for
Betteroads to remove the Plant from the Premises. As of the date of this Notice, Betteroads has
not removed the Plant.
The component parts of the Plant are specifically set forth on Exhibit 1 hereto.
EFTA00803380
LSJE, LW v Eetteroads
Case No. St-16-CV-615
Heavy Materials' Notice of Removal and Disposal of Asphalt Plant
Page 2 of 3
DUDLEY, TOPPER
AND FEUERZEIG, LIP
1007 Fro666006669 Gabe
Da( 766
z Thomas. V.S. V.I. 008060756
040) 774.402 As recognized by the Court in the portion of the Judgment quoted above, the law imposes
a duty on the outgoing tenant to restore the premises to its former condition by removing his
personal property. See Coin Amusement Co., Inc. v. R.C. Spenceley, Inc., 14 V.I. 561, 565 (Ten.
Ct. 1978). A tenant may not, after termination of the lease, interfere with the landlord's right to
exclusive use and possession of the premises. Id. at 566. In the absence of an agreement
between the parties to the contrary, a building erected by a tenant for the purposes of his trade or
business is to be regarded as a trade fixture which is the tenant's personal property and is
removable by the tenant during or at the expiration of his tenancy. Resevic v. Henderson, 7 V.I.
326, 332 (Ten. Ct. 1969). The tenant may remove the structure during his tenancy or a
reasonable time thereafter. Id.; see also Coin Amusement, 14 V.I. at 565 ("Restoration of the
premises must be effected within a reasonable time of termination of the lease if termination is
neither foreseeable nor due to the tenant's default; otherwise it is at the time the lease
terminates."). Virgin Islands law has defined a "reasonable time" for a former tenant to remove
property from the leased premises as a month after the tenancy ends. See Coin Amusement, 14
V.I. at 566-7. Notably, if the tenant fails to remove a structure within a reasonable time he
thereby relinquishes his ownership of the structure to the owner of the land upon which it has
been left and the latter may thereafter deal with it in any way he sees fit without incurring any
obligation to its former owner for its value, use or destruction. Resevic, 7 V.I. at 332.
Accordingly, Heavy Materials intends to remove the Plant from its Premises and dispose
of the same.
EFTA00803381
LSJE, LLC v Betteroads
Case No. St-16-CV-615
Heavy Materials' Notice of Removal and Disposal of Asphalt Plant
Page 3 of 3
Respectfully submitted,
DUDLEY, TOPPER AND FEUERZEIG, LLP
DUDLEY, TOPPER
AND FEUERZEIG, LLP
1070 Frideriksterg Cede
■ Box 756
7_ Thomas US Y.L. COSO4-0756
1:740) 774-4422 DATED: May 22, 2017 By:
Lisa Michelle Kiimives
V.I. Bar No. 1171
Law House - 1000 Frederiksberg Gade
PO Box 756
St. Thomas, VI 00804-0756
Telephone: (340) 774-4422
Teleco ier: (340) 715-4400
ttorneys or eavy aterials, LLC
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
THIS IS TO CERTIFY that on May 22, 2017, I served a copy of the foregoing, THIRD-
PARTY HEAVY MATERIALS, LLC'S NOTICE OF REMOVAL AND DISPOSAL, which complies
with the page and word limitations set forth in Rule 6-1(e), by U.S. Mail on:
Marjorie Whalen, Esq.
Kellerhals Ferguson Kroblin PLLC
9053 Estate Thomas, Suite 101
St. Thomas, VI, 00802
mwhalen@kelliercom
Attorneys for LSJE, LLC
RADOCS\53291721DRFTPLOGAI 785928.DOCX Eugenio W.A. Geigel-Simounet, Esq.
Law Offices of Wilfredo Geigel
Box 25749
stiansted, VI 00824
ttorneys or Btteroads sphalt Corp.
nit(' Wldb-)
Michele Barber
EFTA00803382
EXHIBIT 1
EFTA00803383
Betteroads Asphalt Corporation
#3G Estate Bovoni
St. Thomas, USVI
Sent Via Email Components List
Date: January 20, 2017
Re: Plant #7
Location:St. Thomas, USVI
Prepared By: E. Jeffers
Qty. Description Condition Remarks
4 Cold Aggregate Feed Bins Fair Contains aggregates
I Cold Aggregate Feed Conveyor Fair Not serviced since July 2016
1 Counter Flow Dryer Drum Fair Not serviced since July 2016
1 Hot Aggregate Escalator Fair Not serviced since July 2016
1 Burner Fair Not serviced since July 2016
1 Bag House Dust Collector Fair Not serviced since July 2016
1 Storage Silo Fair Approximate 80-Ton Capacity
1 Weigh Scale Fair Not serviced since July 2016
1 Control Room Fair Unused since July 2016
1 Generator Fair Not serviced since July 2016
1 Electrical Transformer Fair Not serviced since July 2016
2 Bitumen Supply Tank Fair Contains approximately 500 gallons bitumen
2 Spare Bitumen Tank Fair May contain sludge
EFTA00803384
BETTE ROADS
ASPHALT CORP.
I Diesel Supply Tank Fair Contains approximately 100 gallons diesel
I Storage Tank Fair Contains approximately 150 gallons Tack Oil
2 Storage Tank Poor Unusable
Mixing Tower System
LINK Hot Aggregate Bins Fair Not serviced since July 2016
UNK Aggregate Scales Fair Not serviced since July 2016
N/A Vibrating Screens Fair Not serviced since July 2016
1 Pugmill Mixer Fair Not serviced since July 2016
Betteroads Asphalt Corporation Plant #7 2 Components List
EFTA00803385
EXHIBIT 2
EFTA00803386
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS 539"43-
DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN
HEAVY MATERIALS LLC CASE NO. ST-16-CV-0000678
ACTION FOR: FORCIBLE ENTRY,
DETAINER, AND RESTITUTION
VS
BETTERROADS ASPHALT CORP.
Defendant
NOTICE OF ENTRY OF
JUDGMENT
TO: ANSAEIRAVIOSIMMIVES:vESQUIRE
WILFREDO A. GEIGEL, ESQUIRE
Please take notice that on December 14, 2016 a(n) JUDGMENT dated
December 08, 2016 was entered by the Clerk in the above-entltled matter.
Dated: December 14, 2016 Estrella H. George
Acting Clerk of the Court
EFTA00803387
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS
DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN
HEAVY MATERIALS, LLC )
)
Plaintiff )
)
VS. )
) BETTEROADS ASPHALT, LLC )
)
Defendant )
)
JUDGMENT CASE NO: ST-16-CV-678
ACTION FOR FORCIBLE ENTRY
AND DETAINER
THIS MATTER came on for hearing before the Magistrate Judge Henry V. Carr, III of
the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands on Saturday, December 3, 2016.i Attorney Lisa M.
Komives (Dudley, Topper and Fuerzeig, LLP) appeared on behalf of Plaintiff Heavy Materials,
LLC. Present with her was Kurt Nose, its Regional Vice President. Defendant Betteroads
Asphalt, LLC appeared telephonically = through its counsel, Wilfredo A. Geigel. No other
representative appeared on Defendant's behalf.
The Court asked the parties whether they had an opportunity to resolve this FED case,
whether this case was an emergency, and if not, why this case could not be continued to another
date. Attorney Komives stated that Defendant,, through its counsel, would admit that Plaintiff
had a right to re-enter the premises. AttOmey Geigel stated on the record and admitted that
Plaintiff had such a right to re-enter the premises. Upon questioning by the Court, Attorney
Geigel admitted and/or stipulated that all the required lease termination and notices to quit were
properly served on Defendant. The notices required Defendant to vacate the premises October
31, 2016, and Defendant is still in possession. The reason why Plaintiff's counsel wanted an
immediate hearing was due to her client's claim of exigent circumstances by virtue of an
environment protection order. Its counsel represented that that order required Plaintiff to take
certain remediation matters regarding the premises. However, Plaintiff's counsel did not have a
This FED case was originally scheduled for hearing on Thursday, December 1, 2016 at 10:00.. It was continued
by Magistrate Carr to allow him to attend the inve=ure of the Honorable Superior Court Judge Jomo Meade held
In St. Croix, United States Virgin Islands at 10:00M. on Friday, December 1, 2016. He continued his advice of
rights as well as his FED cases until 2:30 confident that he could return in time to dispose of these matters.
However, he later learned that his scheduled return flight to St. Thomas would not leave St. Croix until Friday
night, and all other flights and airlines were booked up. He, therefore, continued his cases to Saturday morning,
December 3, 2016
I Attorney Geigel filed a motion to continue the December 1, 2016 hearing, which motion the Court denied. He
appeared In person. In light of the Inconvenience that the Court had already caused the parties, it allowed
Attorney Geigel to appear telephonically, which was his alternate request had the court denied his motion for
continuance.
EFTA00803388
Judgment
Heavy Materials v. Betteroads
Case No. 678/2016
Page 2 of 3
copy of this EPA order with her in court. Nor did she supply a copy of said order when the
Court requested same this week.
There was no dispute that Defendant operated a road paving business on a portion of a
quarry site owned by Plaintiff at Parcel 3A Estate Bovoni, St. Thomas, United States Virgin
Islands ("the premises"). The parties admitted that there was no written lease and that Defendant
maintained possession of the premises as a month-to-month tenant. They also admitted that
Defendant's asphalt plant on the premises ceased operations on September 30, 2016. The
parties, through their respective legal counsel, admitted that Plaintiff had offered to remove the
equipment, trailers and other movable items from the premises and to store them. Defendant was
concerned whether the removal of these movable items would constitute a violation of two (2)
temporary restraining orders issued in the Superior Court, Division of St. Thomas and St. John,
in Gov't of the V.I. v. Betteroads Asphalt Corp., Case No. ST-16-CV-6103, and LSJE, LLC v.
Betteroads Asphalt Corporation, Civil No. 615/2016.4 The essence of the purported violation is
based on the TROs' language which enjoined Defendant from removing any property, money, or
other assets from the territory. Defendant eventually relented and withdrew any further
challenges or objections to Plaintiff's removal of the trailers, equipment or other movables on the
premises, subject to Plaintiff storing them properly to preserve these items. Its counsel's original
reluctance to allow Plaintiff to disassemble the plant and place its parts in storage was due to its
concern that the disassembled structure would cause the plant to lose value to the detriment of its
creditors, including LSJE, plaintiff is the above-referenced case.
The Court continued the case to December 16, 2016 to review the TROs and the
preliminary injunction. It notes the specific language that the Superior Court used to distinguish
two different situations when it denied Plaintiff s 'motion to intervene in the breach of contact
action in Case No. 615:
The Temporary Restraining Order (the "TRO") prohibited Betteroads from
'removing any property, assets, or money from the U.S. Virgin Islands.'
However, there was no such language in the TRO prohibiting Betteroads from
removing any buildings, materials, equipment, or waste from the leased Premises.
Order denying Plaintiff's Motion to Intervene in Case No. 610, p. 3.
In further response in denying Plaintiff's motion to intervene in Case No. 610, the
Superior Court stated that Plaintiff will more than likely seek relief through filing an FED action
3 Plaintiff the Government of the V.I. alleged that Defendant Betteroads is in violation of the Virgin Islands Plant
Closing Law at 24 V.I.C. § 471 et seq.
4 Plaintiff LSJE, LLC alleges that Defendant Betteroads violated Its contract to pave certain roads In Little St. James
and that it is entitled to recover its 5170,833.33 deposit. There was also a preliminary injunction issued by the
Court In Case No. 615: "Defendant, and anyone acting on its behalf, are enjoined from removing any property,
money, or other assets from the territory."
EFTA00803389
Judgment
Heavy Materials v. Betteroads
Case No. 678/2016
Page 3 of 3
to re-enter the premises and to remove any remaining buildings, materials and equipment from
the premises.
This Court, therefore, cannot find any conflict or violation of the aforementioned
temporary restraining orders and permanent injunction that would occur, should it grant Plaintiff
immediate restitution of the premises and allow Plaintiff to re-enter same and to remove the
trailers, equipment and other movable items. Further, as to the asphalt plant, Plaintiff has stated
in open court that it is willing to disassemble the plant and store same. Nevertheless, the issue of
removal or disassembly of the asphalt plant on the premises is really an issue for which
Defendant is responsible, unless the panics can arrive at a mutually satisfactory agreement to
resolve same.
After review of the TROs and preliminary injunction, and based upon the agreements and
stipulations between the parties that Plaintiff is entitled to re-enter the premises and to retake
possession of same, it is hereby:
ORDERED. ADJUDGED AND DECREED:
1. Plaintiff is granted immediate restitution of the premises where Defendant operated a
paving business on a quarry site on a portion of its commercial property located at
Parcel 3A, Estate Bovoni, St. Thomas, United States Virgin Islands.
2. Copies of this Judgment shall be personally deliv c to c el for each party.
DATED: December 9 .2016
ATTEST:
ESTRELLA H. GEORGE
Actiipg Clerk of the Cou
YACINTH M. LO
Senior Deputy Clerk Y V.
Ma istrate of the Superior Court
of the Virgin Islands
AC R IFIEID TRUE COPY
DATE 1 fa 1512Bit D ESTRELLA EL GEORGE
A ING CL K OF HE CO
'BY
CO T E;12 RT
EFTA00803390
📷 Images in this document (11 detected; 6 largest described)
AI-generated factual descriptions of embedded images (llava:13b). These are searchable across the corpus.
[Image 1] The image shows a document that appears to be a court order or a legal notice. It is a scan of a printed document with visible text and a header that includes a case number, a date, and the names of the parties involved. The document is addressed to a specific individual and mentions a "Notice of Motion" and a "Notice of Hearing." It also refers to a "Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment" and a
[Image 2] The image shows a document with text, which appears to be a legal or official letter. The document is titled "NOTICE OF DEFAULT AND INTENTION TO FORECLOSE" and is addressed to a named individual. It mentions a specific property and a date of default. The text includes a reference to a "Notice of Default" and a "Notice of Intent to Foreclose" and mentions a "Notice of Default and Intent to Foreclos
[Image 3] The image shows a document that appears to be a court case summary or a legal document. It includes text and a table with columns for "Plaintiff," "Defendant," "Cause of Action," and "Demand." The visible text includes the names of the parties involved, the date of the case, and a description of the legal action. The document is a formal legal record, likely related to a civil case.
[Image 4] The image shows a document that appears to be a legal or official notice. It is a scanned copy of a page with text and signatures. The document is titled "ORDER OF ADJUDICATION AND DECREE OF FORECLOSURE" and includes a paragraph of text that seems to be related to legal proceedings, possibly regarding a foreclosure case. There are several signatures at the bottom of the page, indicating that it ha
[Image 5] The image shows a document with text, which appears to be a legal or official document. The text is too small to read clearly, but it seems to be a page from a court case or a legal document. There are no visible names, dates, places, or logos that can be discerned from the image provided. The document is a photograph and not a handwritten note or a letter. The content of the document is not legib
[Image 6] The image shows a printed document with a table and text. The table has columns with headings such as "Date," "Time," "Name," "Title," "Company," "Address," and "Phone." There are rows filled with text, which likely contains names, titles, companies, addresses, and phone numbers. The document appears to be a list or directory of some sort, possibly related to a professional or organizational conte