ICIG News Summary Report suspected fraud, waste, and abuse
ICIG News Summary Report suspected fraud, waste, and abuse
ICIG Hotline 855.731-32601 Fax: 571.204.8088
Secure ICIG Hotline: 933.2800
Email: ICIGHotline@dn7gov
Secure Email: ICIGHollIneakinlic.gov
wwwcinl.govilCIG-WhIstleblowerl
Public/Media Inquiries: IC_IG_PAOradni.gov
Office of the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community
Online version available at icig.bulletinintelligence.com
DATE: WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 20, 2019 8:00 AM EST
TODAY'S EDITION
This Day In History
1945: Nuremberg Trials Begin In Germany. 1
Whistleblowing News
Trump Says He Will "Strongly Consider Providing Written
Responses To House Impeachment Questions 1
Witnesses Offer First-Hand Accounts Of Trump-Zelensky Call 3
Trump Highlights Taylor, Kent Reluctance To Identify
"Impeachable Offense." 6
Trump Dismisses Impeachment "Hoax; Will Release Transcript
Of First Zelensky Call 8
Lawmakers Question OMB's Sandy, Release Transcripts From
Another Two Closed-Door Impeachment Hearings 9
Additional Commentary On Whistleblower Issues 10
Assange's Attorney Tells Court He Has Unsuitable Computer In
Jail 12
ICIG In the News
Trump Criticizes Intelligence Inspector General For Seeking
"Publicity For Himself: 12 Graham Says Horowitz Will Testify About FISA Abuse Probe
On Dec. 11 12
Other IG News
Epstein Guards Charged With Falsifying Records 13
DOJ IG Finds Security Risks In FBI Handling Of Confidential
Sources 13
Pentagon IG: US Withdrawal From Northern Syria Helps ISIS
Reconstitute 14
Giuliani Offers Bizarre Explanation For "Misleading' Claims
About Clinton 14
Watchdogs Say VA Continues To Struggle With Cybersecurity
Issues 14
OIG Reports Says HHS' Failure To Modernize Data Practices
Will Limit Ability To Improve Nation's Health. 14
DHS OIG Report USCIS 'Flags Leadership, Cyber Issues: 15
DOL OIG Calls For Faster Migrant Worker Application
Processing 15
DOE: Hanford Employees Lack Protections 15
Government Now Flagging Nursing Homes Recently Cited For
Abuse 15
THIS DAY IN HISTORY:
1945: Nuremberg Trials Begin In Germany. on
November 20, 1945, the Nuremberg trials began in
Nuremberg, Germany. Lord Justice Geoffrey Lawrence
"presided over the proceedings, which lasted 10 months and
consisted of 216 court sessions: The trials 'Were conducted
by an international tribunal made up of representatives from
the United States, the Soviet Union, France and Great
Britain:
WHISTLEBLOWING NEWS:
Trump Says He Will "Strongly Consider"
Providing Written Responses To House Impeachment Questions. In a tweet Monday
morning, President Trump said he would 'strongly consider"
consider submitting written testimony to the House
impeachment inquiry "in order to get Congress focused
again: Trump wrote, "Our Crazy, Do Nothing (where's
USMCA, infrastructure, lower drug pricing & much more?)
Speaker of the House, Nervous Nancy Pelosi, who is petrified
by her Radical Left knowing she will soon be gone (they &
Fake News Media are her BOSS), suggested on Sunday's
DEFACE THE NATION that I testify about the phony
Impeachment Witch Hunt. She also said I could do it in
writing. Even though I did nothing wrong, and don't like giving
credibility to this No Due Process Hoax, I like the idea & will,
in order to get Congress focused again, strongly consider it!"
Reuters (11/18, Wolfe, Lynch) reports lawmakers "have
not formally called Trump as a witness in the impeachment
inquiry? but House Speaker Pelosi said on CBS' Face The
EFTA01653163
Nation Sunday, 'The President could come right before the
committee and speak all the truth that he wants if he wants to
take the oath of office...or he can do it in writing. He has every
opportunity to present his case."
Norah O'Donnell said on the CBS Evening News
(11/18, story 3, 1:30, 4.62M) that Trump "surprised his own
White House staff' with the tweet. Bloomberg (11/18, 4.73M)
says Trump's tweet "contrasts with his defiant approach to
the impeachment inquiry thus far," and The Hill (11/18,
Samuels, 2.98M) that it comes "despite his repeated refusal
to cooperate with the investigation thus far." USA Today
(11/18, Jackson, 10.31M) reports, "Some legal analysts
expressed skepticism about Trump's sincerity."
Lester Holt said on NBC Nightly News (11/18, story 4,
0:50, 6.22M) that "there are questions if it would really
happen," and Jim Acosta said on CNN's Situation Room
(11/18, 838K), "Democratic aides at this point say they are
not taking" Trump's comments "very seriously." Similarly, on
ABC World News Tonight (11118, story 4, 2:50, Muir, 6.97M),
Mary Bruce also said Trump's testifying "seems unlikely."
Likewise, Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-CA) said on CNN's
Situation Room (11118, 838K), "He hasn't turned over his
taxes despite saying for years that he would do that. He didn't
show up in person with Bob Mueller despite saying he would
do that. He sent written answers, which hit looks like he may
have falsified, to the Mueller team. But more than that, we
would like him to just allow the witnesses we have
subpoenaed to come to Congress and the documents we
have subpoenaed to be provided to the committee. So, he's
not serious in this process and I don't think it's worth our time
engaging with him on this other than to say we have a lot of
evidence right now and we shouldn't allow him to dictate the
terms for this investigation."
Politico (11/18, Marshall, 4.29M) says that if Trump
"were to submit a written statement rather than appearing in
person, he would avoid live questioning that could put him in
danger of accidentally perjuring himself." However, "his
answers would still be considered under oath." The AP
(11/18, Miller) says Trump "provided written answers to
questions from special counsel Robert Mueller during his
probe into Russian interference in the 2016 election." But,
Mueller "found many of Trump's answers in the Russia probe
less than satisfying."
House Investigators Looking Into Whether Trump
Lied In Written Answers To Mueller. The New York Times
(11/18, Savage, 18.61M) reports that Douglas Letter, the
general counsel for the House, told a federal appeals court
Monday that House impeachment investigators are "exploring
whether President Trump lied in his written answers- to then-
Special Counsel Robert Mueller, thereby "raising the prospect
of bringing an additional basis for a Senate trial over whether
to remove- Trump from office. Letter "told a federal appeals
court panel that impeachment investigators have an
'immense' need to swiftly see the grand jury evidence — redacted portions of the Mueller report, as well as the
underlying testimony transcripts they came from."
The Washington Post (11/18, Marimow, Hsu, 14.2M)
reports that Letter's "request followed closely on the heels of
Friday's conviction of longtime Trump friend Roger Stone."
According to the Post, "Testimony and evidence at his trial
appeared to cast doubt on written replies from Trump to
Mueller about the president's knowledge about attempts by
his 2016 campaign to learn more about the release of hacked
Democratic emails by the anti-secrecy group WildLeaks."
Reuters (11/18, Wolfe) says that during Stone's trial,
Rick Gates, Trump's former deputy campaign chairman,
"suggested in testimony during a jury trial in a criminal case
that Trump talked to...Stone about WikiLeaks during the 2016
campaign." According to Reuters, Gates' testimony
"appeared to conflict with sworn written statements that
Trump gave Mueller." Mueller wrote to Mueller, "I do not recall
discussing WikiLeaks with [Stone]. Nor do I recall being
aware of Mr. Stone having discussed WikiLeaks with
individuals associated with my campaign."
Pelosi Argues Leaving Trump's Fate To The
Election Would Be "Dangerous." The Washington Post
(11/18, Wagner, Shammas, 14.2M) reports that in a letter to
House Democrats Monday, House Speaker Pelosi asserted
that -the facts of the impeachment inquiry are 'uncontested,'"
and that Trump "abused his power for his own personal,
political benefit, at the expense of our national security
interests." Pelosi "also argued that it would be "dangerous" to
leave Trump's fate to next year's election because 'the
President is jeopardizing the integrity of the 2020 elections."'
ABC Poll: 70% Call Trump's Ukraine Actions
'Wrong'; 51% Support Impeachment And Removal. ABC
News (11/18, 2.97M) reports on its website that according to
a new ABC NewslIpsos poll, "an overwhelming 70% of
Americans think President Donald Trump's request to a
foreign leader to investigate his political rival...was wrong,"
and 51 percent believe Trump "should be impeached and
removed from office." Politico (11/18, Forgey, 4.29M) reports
that "13 percent also deemed the president's push for foreign
investigations of his rivals to be wrong, but believed he
should neither be impeached nor convicted by Congress. A
quarter of respondents, 25 percent, said Trump did nothing
wrong." The New York Times (11/18, Stolberg, 18.61M)
reports, "The survey found 58 percent of Americans are
following the [impeachment] hearings closely or somewhat
closely."
Impeachment Inquiry To Hear From Officials Who
Were On Trump-Zelensky Call. Mary Bruce reported on
ABC World News Tonight (11/18, story 4, 2:50, Muir, 6.97M)
that Congress on Tuesday will 'bear from three officials who
were on that call between Trump and the Ukrainian
President. Jennifer Williams, a special adviser to the Vice
President, called it 'unusual and inappropriate, - and Lt. Col.
Alexander Vindman, who told investigators, "I did not think it
2
EFTA01653164
was proper to demand that a foreign government investigate
a US citizen." Bruce added that 'he most anticipated witness
of the week is Gordon Sondland, the Trump mega-donor
turned US Ambassador to the EU. Sondland has already
revised his testimony once, admitting he personally told the
Ukrainians that if they wanted nearly $400 million of military
aid, they would have to publicly commit to investigate the
Bidens." Bruce added that democrats announced Monday
that David Holmes, who "testified he overheard one of their
phone calls in a restaurant in Kiev," will "testify in public on
Thursday."
State Officials Heard Of Zelensky's Concerns About
Biden Probe Pressure In May. The AP (11/18, Butler,
Biesecker) reports that State Department officials were
informed that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky "was
feeling pressure from the Trump administration to investigate
former Vice President Joe Biden even before the July phone
call that has led to impeachment hearings in Washington."
According to the AP, in May, "officials at the U.S. Embassy in
Kyiv, including then-Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch," were
told Zelensky Vas seeking advice on how to navigate the
difficult position he was in," and Vas concerned' Trump and
"associates were pressing him to take action that could affect
the 2020 U.S. presidential race."
Embassy Staffer Who Says He Overheard Trump-
Sondland Call To Testify Tuesday. The CBS Evening
News (11/18, story 2, 2:30, O'Donnell, 4.62M) reported,
"Democrats added a new witness to the impeachment inquiry
late today: the embassy staffer who says he overheard the
President on the phone asking about investigations into the
Bidens. David Holmes will be the ninth witness in a rapid-fire
round of hearings that kick off tomorrow." The AP (11/18)
reports Holmes "overheard Trump talking about the
investigations on a phone call" with US Ambassador to the
EU Gordon Sondland. The Washington Post (11/18,
Zapotosky, Demirjian, Nakashima, Viebeck, 14.2M) reports
Holmes 'told lawmakers last week that he was shocked to
overhear" the call in which Sondland "assured President
Trump that Ukrainian officials would pursue an investigation
of interest to the U.S. commander in chief — a probe which
the diplomat later suggested was of former Vice President
Joe Biden. Holmes "also testified that the Ukrainians
'gradually came to understand that they were being asked to
do something in exchange' for a White House meeting or
military aid."
Vindman To Appear Before Impeachment Panel
Tuesday. The Washington Post (11/18, Hamburger,
Leonnig, Bade, 14.2M) reports, "The House impeachment
hearing Tuesday is set to feature one of the Democrats' star
witnesses: Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, a Purple Heart
recipient who is expected to testify about his alarm at
President Trump's request that Ukraine investigate his
political opponents." Republicans "are also seizing on
Vindman's testimony as an opportunity, signaling that they plan to try to discredit one of the key witnesses in the inquiry
by questioning his motives and his loyalty to the president."
The Post says the "high-stakes appearance could provide
some of the most contentious moments in the public
hearings."
"Sources" Tell CNN Trump Has Said He Wants To
Fire Impeachment Witnesses. Anderson Cooper said on
CNN's Anderson Cooper 360 (11/18, 969K), "Sources tell
CNN that President Trump has again said he wants to fire
witnesses who have testified against him in the impeachment
hearings, prompting his aides to consider moving those
witnesses, some of them out of the White House, and back to
their home departments within the government."
McConnell Predicts Impeachment Trial Will Carry
Into 2020. Politico (11/18, Everett, 4.29M) reports Senate
Majority Leader McConnell said Sunday that the House will
likely be considering impeachment until Christmas, which will
push a trial in the Senate into 2020. McConnell told reporters
in Louisville, "It looks to me like the House is going to be on
this until Christmas, then it comes over to the Senate. It
displaces all other business. ... I don't know how long
senators will want to continue the trial, but I'm pretty confident
that in the end impeachment will not lead to ouster." Politico
says that timeline means the trial "is almost certain to conflict
with the efforts of a half-dozen Democratic senators to win
the party's nomination for president."
How House Staffers Learned US Aid To Ukraine
Was Frozen And What They Did Next. NBC News (11/18,
6.14M) reports on the events that led to the discovery that
financial assistance to Ukraine had been frozen and actions
taken to get the money released. Two days after "a
whistleblower secretly filed a complaint about President
Trump's dealings with Ukraine in August, two top
congressional staffers arrived in Kyiv on a routine business
trip that ended up setting off alarm bells on Capitol Hill.' The
aides "work for the Democratic leadership of the House
Appropriations Committee, which is responsible for federal
spending.' They had been "dispatched to make an on-the-
ground assessment of the cash Congress has been pumping
into former Soviet states — including Moldova, Georgia and
Ukraine — to aid their defenses against Russian aggression."
But after traveling from Chisinau, the staffers 'were shocked
to learn from US embassy officials that there was no new
money coming into Ukraine."
Witnesses Offer First-Hand Accounts Of
Trump-Zelensky Call. According to the AP (11/19),
"Republicans have consistently criticized the House
impeachment inquiry by saying witnesses didn't have
firsthand knowledge of" President Trump's "role in trying to
persuade Ukraine to investigate a chief political rival."
However, the AP says that after today's public hearing, -that
posture is suddenly more difficult to maintain" because "the
two witnesses in Tuesday morning's session each listened to
3
EFTA01653165
the July 25 phone call in which Trump prodded his Ukrainian
counterpart to investigate Democratic rival Joe Biden."
Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman testified before the House
Intelligence Committee today that Trump's call with Ukrainian
President Zelensky was Improper" and he considered it his
"duty to pass along his concerns. However, the AP (11/19,
Mascaro, Jalonick) says Republicans on the panel "tried to
undercut the national security official with pointed exchanges
questioning his loyalty: The AP also says Vindman "deflected
repeated Republican efforts to divulge everyone he told about
it — thwarting Trump allies' attempts to identify the
anonymous whistleblower who spurred the impeachment
probe."
Politico (11/19, Bertrand, Forgey, Marshall, 4.29M)
reports that Vindman 'explained that he had already 'alerted'
White House lawyer John Eisenberg to Gordon Sondland's
push for political investigations during a July 10 meeting at
the White House with Ukrainian officials, and that subsequent
to reporting the contents of that meeting to Eisenberg he was
'invited to follow up with any other concerns.- Politico adds,
"So he reported Trump's July 25 comments to Eisenberg
'without hesitation,' he testified.-
The New York Times (11/19, Hakim, 18.61M) reports
that "because [Vindman] was a key point of contact with
Ukrainian officials, they sought his guidance on" Rudy
Giuliani's "efforts to push the investigations." According to the
Times, Vindman, "reflecting the National Security Council's
policy...advised Ukrainian officials, including Mr. Zelensky, to
steer clear of American politics."
The AP (11/19, Mascaro, Jalonick) says the
Republicans' lead counsel "asked at one point about an offer
to Vindman from a Ukrainian official to become the country's
defense minister." According to the AP, Vindman "called it
'comical' and said he swiftly reported it up his chain of
command." Politico (11/19, Bertrand, Forgey, Marshall,
4.29M) reports that Vindman 'testified that Alexander
Danyliuk, Zelensky's national security adviser, on at least
three occasions offered him the role of Ukrainian defense
minister." Bloomberg (11/19, 4.73M) reports that Danyiyuk
said today that 'the suggestion 'was made in joking manner,
which was clear by the context and tone,"' and "added that is
was also clear that Vindman took it as a joke."
Reuters (11/19, Zengerle, Freifeld, Landay) reports that
"even as he was testifying, the White House's official Twitter
account attacked [Vindman's] judgment — even though he is a
current White House official, and the president's son Donald
Trump Jr. assailed him in a separate Twitter post as 'a low
level partisan bureaucrat and nothing more."
Pence's National Security Adviser: Williams Never
Voiced Concerns About Trump-Zelensky Call. Politico
(11/19, Desiderio, Cheney, 4.29M) reports that Jennifer
Williams, an adviser to Vice President Pence described the
Trump-Zelensky phone call as "unusual" because it 'involved
discussion of what appeared to be a domestic political matter,' rather than U.S. foreign policy goals in the region.
The references to Biden 'struck me as political in nature given
that the former vice president is a political opponent of the
president,' Williams said, but she declined to speculate about
Trump's motives."
Bloomberg (11/19, 4.73M) reports that Keith Kellogg,
Pence's national security adviser, "said in a statement
Tuesday that he listened to Trump's July 25 phone call
with...Zelenskiy and that he 'heard nothing wrong or
improper.'" Bloomberg says Kellogg issued the statement
after Williams testified that she "didn't inform him of any
concerns after the call." Kellog said, "In fact, she never
reported any personal or professional concerns to any other
member of the vice president's staff, including our chief of
staff and the vice president."
The New York Times (11/19, Baker, Shear, 18.61M)
reports that Marc Short, Pence's chief of staff, "went on Fox
News to make the same point. 'She said she found the call
unusual yet she never raised any concerns with her
supervisor General Kellogg, she never raised any concerns
with the chief of staff, she never raised any concerns with the
vice president,' he said."
In a profile of Williams published before her appearance
today, the New York Times (11/19, Shear, 18.61M) says
Democrats are "interested in what Mr. Pence knew about the
effort to withhold security aid in exchange for a commitment
to investigate the Bidens." According to the Times, 'During
the closed-door deposition, Ms. Williams told lawmakers that
she was not aware that the vice president was involved in any
discussions about the investigations. She said Mr. Pence did
not mention investigations to Mr. Zelensky."
Morrison: Trump-Zelensky Call Included Nothing
Illegal. The New York Times (11/19, Baker, Shear, 18.61M)
reports that Timothy Morrison, the former senior director for
Europe and Ukraine at the National Security Council, "said he
did not think the president's July 25 call...was inherently
wrong or illegal, but feared it would ignite a political storm if it
became public." Morrison is quoted as saying, "I feared at the
time of the call on July 25 how its disclosure would play in
Washington's dimate.... My fears have been realized."
Volker Says He Misunderstood Import Of Push For
Burisma Probe. The Washington Post (11/19, Wagner,
Itkowit, 14.2M) reports that Kurt Volker, a former envoy to
Ukraine, testified before the House Intelligence Committee
today that he "should have realized President Trump's true
motives in demanding that Ukraine investigate Burisma, a
natural gas company that employed former vice president
Joe Biden's son Hunter." Volker is quoted as saying, "I did not
understand that others believed that an investigation of the
Ukrainian company Burisma, which had a history of
accusations of corruption, was tantamount to investigating
Vice President Biden. I drew a sharp distinction between the
two: However, the Post says Volker's testimony is "belied by
text messages that he tumed over to the House Intelligence
4
EFTA01653166
Committee last month, which show acting U.S. ambassador
to Ukraine William B. Taylor Jr. raising precisely that
concern."
Both Vindman And Williams Say Transcript Of July
25 Was Generally Accurate. The Federalist (11/19, Marcus,
126K) says both Vindman and Williams testified that "the
transcript of the July 25 phone call between President Trump
and Ukrainian President Zolodymyr Zelensky was
substantively accurate." According to the Federalist, "In direct
response to a question as to whether the transcript was
complete and accurate, neither suggested that it was not,
except for minor details they found in their notes of the call."
The Federalist says that "blows up a month-long lie pushed
by Democrats and their media allies that the transcript was
partial, or redacted, suggesting that the White House was
potentially hiding important details."
Nunes Questions Vindman's Claim To Not Know
Whistleblower's identity. The Daily Caller (11/19, 716K)
reports that House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam
Schiff "quickly interrupted" Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman during
his testimony today after he "admitted that he had spoken to
others about" President Trump's July 25 call with Ukrainian
President Zelensky. The Daily Caller says Rep. Devin Nunes
(R-CA), the top Republican on the panel, sask[ed] who
Vindman might have spoken to about the call and his
concerns about the implications of that call." Schiff said, "We
need to protect the whistle-blower. Please stop. I want to
make sure that there is no effort to out the whistle-blower
through these proceedings." However, Nunes "pointed out
then that LTC Vindman had, in his deposition, stated that he
did not know the identity of the whistleblower — which
Vindman confirmed. 'How it is possible for you to name the
people and then out the whistle-blower?' Nunes asked then."
The Federalist (11/19, 126K) reports that Vindman
today "admitted...to leaking information to the anti-Trump
whistleblower at the center of the Democrats' partisan
impeachment proceedings." According to the Federalist,
"When pressed on who Vindman spoke with about the call,
Vindman said he spoke with two individuals not in the White
House, including Deputy Assistant Secretary George Kent
and another individual in the intelligence community that
Vindman refused to name before being cut off by...Schiff."
The Federalist says Vindman lestified under oath in a private
deposition last month that he was unaware of who the
whistleblower was." Today, Nunes "pressed Vindman on how
it is possible that he might out the whistleblower if he does not
know the identity of the whistleblower."
The New York Times (11/19, Baker, Shear, 18.61M)
reports that Nunes also "sought to turn the focus away from
Mr. Trump to Mr. Biden, leading the witnesses through a
series of questions intended to suggest that the former vice
president had intervened in Ukraine's domestic affairs to
benefit his son, Hunter Biden, despite the lack of evidence." Johnson Cites Whistleblower Attorney's Anti-
Trump Comments. The Washington Examiner (11/17,
Pearce, 448K) reports that in an appearance on NBC's Meet
The Press (11/17, 2.8M), Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) cited past
statements from the whistleblower's attorney as evidence that
the impeachment inquiry is partisan. Johnson said, "Now, if
this whistleblower is to be lionized by the Washington Post,
then maybe we ought to take a look at who he hired.... He
hired Mark Zaid, who said, 'Coup has started. First of many
steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately.' Now, that is not an
unbiased officer of the court. So, there is something going on
here, Chuck. That's my point." Johnson was referring to "a
tweet Zaid sent out on Jan. 30, 2017, just days after Trump
was inaugurated." Zaid wrote, ltcoup has started. First of
many steps. #rebellion. /*impeachment will follow ultimately.
#lawyers."
The Washington Post (11/17, Sonmez, Demirjian,
Macmillan, 14.2M) reports Johnson said Administration
officials who provided information to the whistleblower about
the President's efforts to pressure Ukraine "exposed things
that didn't need to be exposed' Johnson said, "This would
have been far better off if we would've just taken care of this
behind the scenes.... We have two branches of government.
Most people, most people wanted to support Ukraine. We
were trying to convince President Trump."
In a tweet Sunday afternoon President Trump again
called for the whistleblower to come forward. Trump wrote,
"Where is the Fake Whistleblower?"
Bannon Says He Pushed For Alleged Whistleblower
To Removed From NSC. The Daily Caller (11/17, Ross,
716K) reports former White House chief strategist Steve
Bannon said in an interview with VICE published Friday 'that
when he was at the White House in 2017, he was involved in
an effort to remove an intelligence officer suspected of being
the Trump whistleblower from the National Security Council
due to concerns about leaks." Bannon "said he does not
believe that the whistleblower needs to be identified publicly,
but he did confirm his involvement in efforts to remove an
individual now rumored to be the whistleblower from the
NSC." He said, "I don't think the individual naming of the
whistleblower is important, although there was a story in The
Washington Times...that tied me to the efforts to get, at least,
the gentleman who was named out of the National Security
Council." Asked if the story was true, Bannon said, 'The
individual that was named, absolutely true."
Trump: Whistleblower's Identity Is "No Great
Secret." The Hill (11/15, Cohn, 2.98M) reports that on 'The
Dan Bongino Show," President Trump on Friday "claimed the
identity of the whistleblower who first raised concerns about
his relationship with Ukraine is known to everyone in D.C."
Trump said, "Everyone in Washington knows who it is, by the
way. The whistleblower is no great secret." He added,
"Everybody knows who the whistleblower is, and [it] has to be
5
EFTA01653167
revealed." However, The Hill says that Trump did not state
the name.
SEC Rethinking Plans To Alter Whistleblower
Program, Sources Say. The Securities and Exchange
Commission "is rethinking a proposal that could weaken a
landmark whistleblower program after a pushback from
whistleblower lawyers and advocates, people with knowledge
of the deliberations told" Reuters (11/15, Johnson, Prentice),
which reports the program "is widely considered a major
success, resulting in more than $2 billion in penalties against
firms such as JPMorgan and Bank of America and $387
million in rewards. Weakening the program would hamper the
agency's ability to detect and prosecute white collar crime,
say lawyers."
Trump Highlights Taylor, Kent Reluctance To
Identify "Impeachable Offense." In a tweet
Thursday, President Trump highlighted that in their testimony
Thursday, Acting Ukraine Ambassador William Taylor and
State Department official George Kent did not respond when
Rep. John Ratdiffe (R-TX) called on them to identify the
"impeachable offense" in his call with Ukrainian President
Volodymyr Zelensky. Trump wrote, "@RepRatcliffe asked the
two 'star witnesses, 'where is the impeachable event in that
call?' Both stared straight ahead with a blank look on their
face, remained silent, & were unable to answer the question.
That would be the end of a case run by normal people! — but
not Shifty!"
Taylor, Kent Say Volker Advised Ukrainian Officials
Against Investigating Political Rivals. The Washington
Examiner (11/14, Gehrke, 448K) reports that Acting Ukraine
Ambassador William Taylor and State Department official
George Kent testified last month that a Sept. 14 meeting led
by Kurt Volker, the State Departments lead negotiator for the
war in Ukraine at the time, "deteriorated into an angry
confrontation: Taylor was present at the meeting along with
Ukrainian presidential adviser Andriy Yermak. Taylor and
Kent testified that in the meeting, 'Volker discouraged
Ukrainian officials from investigating former President Petro
Poroshenko, whom current President Volodymyr Zelensky
defeated in April: Volker "argued that it is wrong to use the
judicial system to target political rivals. But Zelensky's aide
dismissed that rebuke by invoking Trump's desire for
investigations into Democratic politicians." The Examiner
says the exchange "underscores the Zelensky team's
perception that they were being pressured to accuse Biden of
corruption in order to help President Trump's reelection
campaign."
Second Source Claims To Have Overheard
Sondland Talking To Trump From Kiev. The AP (11/14,
Butler) reports that "a second U.S. Embassy staffer in Kyiv
overheard a cellphone call between" Trump and Gordon
Sondland, the US ambassador to the EU, "discussing a need
for Ukrainian officials to pursue 'investigations.'" The July 26 call Vas first described during testimony Wednesday by
William Taylor, the acting U.S. ambassador to Ukraine," who
"said one of his staffers overhead the call while Sondland was
in a Kyiv restaurant the day after Trump's July 25 phone call
with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy that triggered
the House impeachment inquiry: According to the AP, "The
second diplomatic staffer also at the table was Suriya Jayanti,
a foreign service officer based in Kyiv." The Washington Post
(11/14, Wagner, 14.2M) reports that Jayanti was the
embassy official tasked with accompanying Sondland
throughout the day of the call."
Mary Bruce said on ABC World News Tonight (11/14,
story 6, 0:30, Muir, 6.71M) that on Friday, lawmakers will hear
from David Holmes, the Taylor aide who heard Trump's
phone call with Sondland. Holmes 'will be pressed on what
he overheard the President saying." Bruce added,
"Lawmakers may want to question the other staffer who
reportedly also overheard the phone call."
Peter Alexander said on NBC Nightly News (11/14,
story 4, 0:55, Holt, 5.7M) that Democrats say the call "lies
President Trump to the pressure campaign on Ukraine." Rep.
Andre Carson (D-IN) said on CNN's Situation Room (11/14,
1.06M), "What is dear is that what' Taylor's aide "witnessed
and what he overheard, I think it reaffirms what we already
know, that President Trump attempted to use Congress-
approved taxpayer dollars to hang over the head of the
Ukrainian government in an attempt to get them to get
information on a political rival, i.e. Joe Biden.-
Longtime OMB Employee To Break Ranks, Testify
In Impeachment Inquiry. The Washington Post (11/14,
Werner, 14.2M) reports Mark Sandy, "a longtime career
employee" at OMB "is expected to break ranks and testify
Saturday in the House Democrats' impeachment inquiry,
potentially filling in important details on the hold-up of military
aid to Ukraine." The Post says OMB has so far 'served as a
bulwark for President Trump against the impeachment
inquiry, since top officials have refused to testify." The Post
adds that a "senior Administration official...discounted the
importance of Sandy's testimony and criticized" House
Speaker Pelosi and House Intelligence Chairman Adam
Schiff 'for calling him to testify: The official said, "With
nothing to show after three years trying to impeach the
President, Speaker Pelosi and Rep. Schiff have resorted to
threatening dedicated civil servants with subpoenas and
depositions without the ability to even have agency counsel
present."
WPost: Yovanovitch Testimony Injects Gender Into
Impeachment Inquiry. The Washington Post (11/14,
Viebeck, 14.2M) reports former Ukraine ambassador Marie
Yovanovitch "has crucial knowledge to impart when she
testifies at Friday's impeachment hearing: Yovanovitch
"enters the spotlight as the latest woman who has refused to
acquiesce to Trump in the face of personal and gender-
specific attacks." The story of her "removal as Ukraine
6
EFTA01653168
ambassador reflects some of the most complicated gender
and political dynamics of Trump's presidency. Now the
impeachment probe is magnifying those dynamics as the first
woman to publicly testify prepares to confront Trump's
fiercest congressional defenders, nearly all men, about a
campaign by other male allies of the president to force her
from her post."
Ukraine FM: Sondland Never Linked Aid To Biden
Investigations. The Washington Examiner (11/14, Pearce,
448K) reports Ukraine Foreign Minister Vadym Prystaiko said
Thursday that US Ambassador to the European Union
Gordon Sondland never tied military aid to Ukraine to that
country's government launching investigations into Burisma.
Prystaiko "told reporters...that Sandland never asked him for
investigations into Joe Biden's son's role with the energy
company while Biden was vice president, according to
Interfax-Ukraine." Prystaiko said, "Ambassador Sandland did
not tell us, and did not tell me exactly, about the relation
between the [military] assistance and the investigations. You
should ask him. ... I do not recall any conversation with me as
with foreign minister. It was not we, the Ukrainian officials
[who were told this]. ... I have never seen a direct link
between investigations and security assistance. Yes,
investigations were mentioned, you know, in a Presidential
conversation. But there was no dear connection between
these events."
Pelosi Claims Trump Committed "Bribery." The AP
(11/14, Mascaro, Jalonick) reports House Democrats are
"refining part of their impeachment case against the president
to a simple allegation: Bribery." House Speaker Pelosi on
Thursday "brushed aside the Latin phrase 'quid pro quo' that
Democrats have been using." Pebsi said of Trump's July 25
phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy in
which he asked the Ukrainian leader for a favor, "It's perfectly
wrong. It's bribery." Mary Bruce said on ABC World News
Tonight (11/14, story 4, 1:00, Muir, 6.71M) that Pelosi's use of
the word "bribery" is 'a new and explicit allegation, and a
major step for the Speaker! Nancy Cordes said on the CBS
Evening News (11114, story 3, 1:10, O'Donnell, 4.08M) that
this was the first time Pelosi used the term, which 'has been
gaining steam in her party."
Peter Alexander said on NBC Nightiv News (11/14,
story 3, 1:10, Holt, 5.7M) that Pebsi called Wednesday's
testimony from Ambassador William Taylor and State
Department official George Kent "devastating! Politico
(11/14, Caygle, 4.29M) quotes Pebsi as saying the testimony
"corroborated evidence of bribery uncovered in the inquiry
and that the President abused power and violated his oath by
threatening to withhold military aide and a White House
meeting in exchange for an investigation into his political
rival." Politico says Pelosi nevertheless "cautioned" that she
"isn't yet ready to say whether the House will vote to impeach
Trump, an outcome many lawmakers think is all but certain to
happen by the end of this year." The Hill (11/14, Lillis, 2.98M) says Pebsi "accused
Trump of committing offenses more severe than those of
President Nixon, who resigned in 1974 amid an impeachment
proceeding." She said, °What President Trump has done on
the record — in terms of ... [asking] a foreign power to help
him in his own election and the obstruction of information
about that, the cover up — makes what Nixon did look almost
small."
McCarthy Says Schiff Has "Lied Numerous Times."
The Washington Post (11/14, Wagner, 14.2M) reports that
House Minority Leader McCarthy on Thursday "accused"
House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff "of lying when he
said Wednesday that he does not know the identity of the
whistieblower." According to the Post, when "pressed for
evidence to back up his claim, McCarthy did not directly
answer the question but instead repeatedly accused Schiff of
lying." Speaking at his weekly news conference, McCarthy
said, "I think Adam Schiff has lied numerous times." The
Washington Examiner (11/14, Ferrechio, 448K) says
McCarthy "said Schiff has a history of lying, and he pointed to
Sthiff's public, unsubstantiated claims that there is evidence
Trump colluded with Russians ahead of the 2016 election."
WPost Analysis: GOP's Hearsay Impeachment
Defense Is "Extremely Risky." A Washington Post (11/14,
Bade, Debonis, Dawsey, 14.2M) analysis says the White
House and Republicans "have seized on the lack of
witnesses with firsthand knowledge of President Trump's
actions on Ukraine to try to undermine the Democrats' case
for impeachment." But the strategy "is extremely risky....
While it is true that the diplomats testified that they were told
by others that Trump pressured Ukraine, a witness with
firsthand information — possibly former national security
adviser John Bolton — could still emerge." The Post adds that
"if Republicans were so concerned about secondhand
accounts, Democrats say, they should allow Trump
associates who do have firsthand information — acting White
House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney and Energy Secretary
Rick Perry, for example — to testify." Mary Bruce said on ABC
World News Tonight (11/14, story 5, 2:10, Muir, 6.71M),
"Democrats say they want to talk to firsthand witnesses,"
including Mulvaney and Bolton, "but Trump is blocking them
from testifying."
Aides Move To Cast Trump As Presidential, Above
Impeachment Fray. Politico (11/14, Cook, 4.29M) reports
that while the President "typically mocks the idea of acting too
presidential — equating it with being boring," that is "exactly
what Trump appears to be attempting this week during the
first public impeachment hearings." Aides 'have sought to
cast Trump as presidential, busily focused on his policy work
and above the fray of the impeachment proceedings." Politico
cites a "senior Administration official" who said that the White
House "has been making a concerted effort to schedule
presidential work and meetings on Syria, opioid abuse and
the trade talks with China in an effort" to highlight the contrast
7
EFTA01653169
"between who he is and what he is focusing on versus the
partisan impeachment underway in the House."
Senate Republicans Divided Over How To Proceed
With Impeachment Articles. The New York Times (11114,
Hulse, 18.61M) reports some Senate Republicans are
"arguing for a speedy vote" on impeachment articles, which
are expected to come from the House, while others see "an
opportunity to drag out the historic proceedings and tie down
some Democratic senators at a prime moment in their
presidential campaigns." According to Republican senators,
"the split over how to approach what is likely to be the first
presidential impeachment trial ever to unfold in an election
year has been on vivid display in their private weekly lunches
in the Capitol."
Trump Dismisses Impeachment "Hoax," Will
Release Transcript Of First Zelensky Call.
Politico (11/13, Forgey, Okun, 4.29M) reports that at the
White House yesterday alongside Turkish President Recep
Tayyip Erdo'gan, President Trump "dismissed the House's
impeachment proceedings as a 'hoax and said he was 'too
busy to watch' — and then blasted Democrats' choice of
questioners at a hearing he said he hadn't been briefed on."
Trump is quoted as saying, "I'm sure I'll get a report.... I have
not been briefed, no. There's nothing there. I see they're
using lawyers that are television lawyers. They took some
guys off television. I'm not surprised to see it because Schiff
can't do his own questions." The Washington Times (11/13,
Boyer, 492K) says the comment "was an apparent reference
to Democratic counsel Dan Goldman, who is conducting
much of the questioning." Fox News (11/13, Re, 27.59M) also
reports on its website that Trump slammed "the hearsay-
laden 'witch hunt" and said, "I'm going to be releasing, I think
on Thursday, [another] transcript, which actually was the first
of the two [phone calls with Ukraine's leader]."
The AP (11/13, Colvin) casts Trump as "professing
disinterest and disdain," but adds that "even as" he "tried to
suggest that he was above the fray, the president repeatedly
laid out his many grievances against the process playing out
on the opposite end of Pennsylvania Avenue." Said Trump, "I
hear it's a joke. I haven't watched for one minute.... This is a
sham, and it shouldn't be allowed." The Washington
Examiner (11113, Dilly, 448K) reports that the White House
has "been keen to portray an image of a president intent on
delivering his promises to the American people, continuing to
work on overhauling the healthcare system, striking a trade
deal with China, and mulling further tax cuts even as
Democrats pursue impeachment." However, the Examiner
adds, "as a heavy consumer of TV news, White House
watchers are keeping a close eye on Trump's Twitter feed to
see how he reacts to the hearings."
The Washington Times (11113, Munoz, 492K) reports
that in advance of Wednesday's hearing, "the Trump 'war
room' kicked off the defense" of the President, "releasing a video targeting House Speaker Nancy Pebsi." The video
"threads together clips of the California Democrat toeing the
line on impeachment, warning that it would be divisive for the
country, before showing the stark party-line vote that
formalized the impeachment inquiry." Also Wednesday,
Trump tweeted a campaign ad with the caption,
"DEMOCRATS ARE PUTTING POLITICS BEFORE
COUNTRY!"
NBC Nightly News (11/13, story 3, 2:00, Holt, 6.34M)
described the President "and his White House [as]
downplaying what they describe as a witch hunt, decrying it
as boring, and disputing" witness William Taylor's claims in
his testimony. Trump was shown saying, "I know nothing
about that. First time I've heard it.... I don't recall. No, not at
all. Not even a little bit." The CBS Evening News (11/13, story
3, 2:10, O'Donnell, 4.47M) further pointed out Trump "denied
ever talking to EU Ambassador Gordon Sondland about
investigations in Ukraine." ABC World News Tonight (11/13,
story 5, 1:25, Muir, 7.16M) showed Trump adding, "The one
thing I've seen that Sondland said was that he did speak to
me for a brief moment and I said, 'no quid pro quo under any
circumstances,' and that's true. And the other, I've never
heard this." The Hill (11/13, Chalfant, 2.98M) reports "Trump
has aggressively pushed back against the inquiry, accusing
Democrats of a partisan effort to damage his political
prospects." He "has also taken aim at witnesses like Taylor, a
member of his administration, accusing them of being 'Never
Trumpers.'"
ABC World News Tonight (11113, story 6, 0:40, Karl,
7.16M) reported "the bottom line from the White House
perspective is that nothing changed" Wednesday, as "House
Democrats are still on the road to impeaching the President,
but not a single Republican has shown any indication of
breaking ranks. That means" that 'without significant,
dramatic changes, there's no way the Senate would vote to
remove the President, and his fate ultimately will be
determined by voters next November."
However, Politico (11/13, Orr, Cook, Kumar, 4.29M)
says while White House aides "dismissed the landmark event
as a tedious affair," the "attempt to project calm within the
West Wing was belied throughout the morning by a cascade
of combative email blasts, tweets and statements that flowed
from Trump's outside allies and his campaign war room."
John Roberts said on Fox News Special Report (11/13,
1.53M), "The White House's rapid response organization was
buzzing today, pushing back against every piece of evidence
the Democrats extracted from their witnesses, criticizing
Taylor for relying on hearsay and conjecture, some 17 times
during his opening statement, insisting that" Kent
"contradicted the Democrats' assertion that there was a quid
pro quo."
Politico (11113, Kumar, 4.29M) reports, however, that
"frustrated allies are urging Trump to stop talking about
himself and focus on his army of supporters." According to
8
EFTA01653170
Politico, Trump's advisers want the president to hammer
Democrats for trying to subvert the will of the voters in 2016,
depriving the country of Trump's strong economy and
America First foreign policy.' A 'former Trump adviser who
remains close to the White House" is quoted as saying, "What
it does is go to the broader argument: Partisan Democrats
are trying to undo an American election.... It's 'us against
them' instead of 'him against the world.'" The CBS Evening
News (11/13, story 3, 2:10, O'Donnell, 4.47M) reported 'two
spokespeople...are slated to join the White House staff,
including the former Attorney General of Florida, Pam Bondi,
don't have start dates." CBS News "has learned they're in the
process of completing paperwork, which takes time. And a
senior White House official told us it won't make much
difference because they say the current messaging plan is
working."
Also on the CBS Evening News (11/13, story 4, 0:40,
O'Donnell, 4.47M), Major Garrett said "the President knows
and his staff knows for this week and next week, this will be
Washington's biggest story. What does that mean
for...Trump? Awkwardly, he'll be the sub-headline in
Washington's biggest headline story. Not accustomed to
being there." The White House also "knows this complicates
his entire domestic agenda, and talks to advert a government
shutdown possibly next week. And, all these other things
bleed away at the margins what political clout he has on
Capitol Hill."
Taylor Testifies Zelensky Told Him Right After
Trump Call That It Was "Fine" And He Was "Happy" With
Breitbart (11/13, Pollak, 673K) reports "Ambassador Bill
Taylor testified Wednesday that Ukrainian President
Volodymyr Zelensky told him July 26 that his July 25 call with
President Donald Trump had been 'fine' and that he was
'happy' with ft." Taylor, "appearing alongside the State
Department's George Kent, was answering questions from
Republican counsel Steve Castor in the House Intelligence
Committee on the first day of public hearings in the
'impeachment inquiry.- Asked whether he was
"with...Zelensky the very next day" after the call, Taylor said
he was. Pressed on whether "Zelensky raise any concerns
about his views of the call," Taylor replied, "He said — so,
right, so — so I, Ambassador [Kurt] Volker, Ambassador
[Gordon] Sondland, were in his office, and we asked him, I
think, how the call [went]. He said, 'The call was fine. I was
happy with the call."
Eric Trump: No One Outside Beltway "Gives A
Damn" About Hearings. Eric Trump said on Fox News' The
Story (11/13), 'There is not a single person outside the
Washington Beltway that gives a damn about what happened
today. It's boring.... No one was watching it. No one cares.
This is going to change one person's mind. They flopped
horribly.'
Rove: Impeachment Effort Could Help Trump Win
Reelection. In his Wall Street Journal (11/13, Subscription Publication, 7.57M) column, Karl Rove criticizes Democrats'
handling of the impeachment inquiry and argues the probe
could actually help the President's reelection effort.
Lawmakers Question OMB's Sandy, Release
Transcripts From Another Two Closed-Door
Impeachment Hearings. On the NBC Nightly News
(11/16, story 2, 2:28, Diaz-Balart, 5.31M), which was the sole
network newscast to broadcast last night, Jose Diaz-Balart
said Congress Vrapp[ed] up an historic week in the
impeachment inquiry into President Trump with a rare
Saturday session" that featured the 'career budget official"
Mark Sandy, the deputy associate director for national
security programs at the White House Office of Management
and Budget, who "broke ranks with the President to tell his
side of the story: Garrett Hake added that in "another crack
in the White House impeachment fire wall."
The Washington Post (11/15, Demirjian, Bade, Itkowit,
Werner, 14.2M) reports Sandy lestified...that the White
House decision to freeze military aid to Ukraine in mid-July
was highly irregular and that senior political appointees in the
Office of Ma
📷 Images in this document (15 detected; 6 largest described)
AI-generated factual descriptions of embedded images (llava:13b). These are searchable across the corpus.
[Image 1] The image appears to be a photograph of a printed document, specifically a newspaper or magazine article. The text is too small to read in detail, but it seems to be a list of articles or topics covered in the publication. The document includes headlines, subheadings, and possibly dates or bylines, but the specific content of the articles is not legible due to the resolution of the image. The layo
[Image 2] The image appears to be a photograph of a printed document, specifically a newspaper article. The text is too small to read in detail, but it seems to be a news article with headlines and subheadings. The document is printed on a white background with black text. The visible portion of the text includes phrases such as "WHITE HOUSE," "TRUMP," "WHISTLEBLOWER," "REPORT," "CONGRESS," and "INVESTIGATI
[Image 3] The image displays a document with text, which appears to be a list of news articles or headlines. The text is organized in a table format with columns and rows. The content of the text is not fully visible due to the resolution of the image. The visible portion of the text includes phrases such as "Trump," "CNN," "New York Times," "Washington Post," "Biden," "Russia," "Ukraine," "China," "North K
[Image 4] The image shows a page from a printed document, which appears to be a newspaper or magazine article. The text is in English, and it discusses various topics, including political events, legislation, and social issues. The text is organized into paragraphs, each with a heading that seems to be related to the content of the paragraph. The document contains a mix of text and images, with the images a
[Image 5] The image appears to be a photograph of a printed document, specifically a newspaper or magazine article. The text is too small to read in detail, but it seems to be a list of articles or topics covered in the publication. The visible text includes headlines and possibly the names of authors or contributors. The document is not a handwritten note, but rather a printed page with a structured layout
[Image 6] The image appears to be a photograph of a printed document, possibly a newspaper or a magazine article. The text is too small to read in detail, but it seems to be a news article or editorial piece. There are visible headings and subheadings, but the specific content of the text is not clear due to the resolution of the image. The document is printed on a white background, and there are no visible