Document text
Charlie Kirk Told Everyone How He Would Feel About His OWN Assassination
YouTube video by Baron Coleman Clips (@BaronColemanClips) (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DeA1LxkRID0). OPINION COMMENTARY by Baron Coleman (Baron Coleman Clips (@BaronColemanClips)) — one commentator's contested analysis of the Charlie Kirk assassination and the State v. Tyler Robinson prosecution. These are his own assertions and theories, NOT the court record, NOT established fact, and NOT endorsed by profoundd; some make unverified allegations about named individuals. Archived here, attributed and lane-separated as commentary, so the claims can be weighed against the primary record — the tyler-robinson-trial hearings and filings in this same collection. Inclusion in this archive is not evidence of truth.
You could read the statement he gave, uh read it together with the statement he gave at the university there where he was talking to that young college student, and then you put it with the tweets, and you I mean you could come to the conclusion that Charlie Kirk believed the government might So, I want to get to the biggest conspiracy theorist who ever lived. He had some really deep thoughts when it comes to what it is he believes about the government participating in high-level assassinations in broad daylight. You guys might recognize this guy. He's not foreign to many of you. Most of you know who he is. It's the guy on the left here. His name's Charlie. Charlie is standing here on a campus. This fine gentleman will be asking him a question, and he will respond. And I think the response is incredibly interesting when you listen to the content of the response. This man behind him in the black shirt will one day step forward and touch his right arm. About a third of a second after he does that, a loud bang will be heard. And unfortunately, this guy sitting up right here will be killed. He'll be killed in what is either the most coincidental, strangest, poorly timed step forward and pat your right arm in history, or that guy was in on it. But that's not the purpose of tonight. I just noticed it. I want to play this for you because I think it's very interesting how Charlie thought about high-profile assassinations with lots of questions and lots of weirdness versus how his employees feel about it. >> So, I wanted to get like some insight and perspective on what you think of the JFK assassination and why Israel's like kind of tied to it a lot. >> Yeah, so there's really no evidence Israel's tied to it. I mean, the fact Mossad is mentioned in the JFK files doesn't mean Israel's tied to it. I I actually don't believe it was Lee Harvey Oswald that acted alone. I think it's much more >> Wait, what? What? You're telling me a guy was identified by the government, Charlie, as the lone gunman in a high-profile assassination involving a high-powered rifle, and you don't believe he did it acting alone? Are you out of your mind? Are you a conspiracy theorist? That sounds like something a demonic podcaster would say. Are you kidding me? Are you Are you out of your mind? >> Likely that it was Cuban intelligence and our own government that killed JFK. >> OUR OWN GOVERNMENT? CHARLIE! NOW, THIS sounds like Candace Owens. Are you serious with this right now? The government has spoken, Charlie. The FBI has spoken. They had an entire commission with the Supreme Court Chief Justice heading it up. Are you crazy right now? >> Okay, for multiple reasons, and I believe there was a second shooter. >> A what? You think someone else was involved? This is out of This is un- >> You could go through all the reasons as to why, but I think it defies logic that Lee Harvey Oswald, who was a notoriously bad shot, somehow found himself all the way up in the, you know, what, the fourth floor or the fifth floor of the Texas School Book Depository right as that motorcade was flying in a single bolt-action rifle being able to administer, I think it was three shots in 5 seconds with lethal precision, even though we all saw with our lying eyes in the Zapruder film, uh, John F. Kennedy's head go back into the left. >> Oh, that's weird. So, you're suggesting, Charlie, when you get shot, you fall to the direction from the gunshot? You don't You don't lean in? What?This is so weird. I don't believe this for a second. Who is this guy? I I'm Some of you may not who you know who he is. He was a famous political personality. He had a podcast. He wrote books. His name's Charlie Kirk. He was tragically gunned down, uh, I you know, ironically, I guess, in light of this conversation. Tragically gunned down or tragically taken down. And there was some discussion about whether or not it happened. And there were some insane podcasters. I mean, truly insane podcasters. People who'd lost their minds. And they came out after he went down, and they started saying maybe the government was involved. Maybe there were others involved. Maybe there was a second person involved. Maybe there were more Obviously, these people were demonic. Obviously. I'm just shocked to hear him saying this. >> If there are two shooters, that means that the Warren Commission, which was the official report on the JFK assassination, was fault fraudulent and was faulty. >> What? No. You're telling me a government commission rigged No. No. Stop it. This is ludicrous. This is ludicrous. I feel like I'm watching Candace Owens. This is nuts. Second shooter. The Supreme Court Chief Justice headed up the Warren Commission. A future president was on the Warren Commission. Congressmen, senators. This was our federal government putting its seal of approval on the fact that it was a lone gunman acting alone with a high-powered rifle from a distance shooting a high-profile political figure in broad daylight. It's over. There's no There's There's no question. Anyone who would suggest otherwise, I don't know if they're on I don't know if you're on the payroll of Qatar, Russia. Are you anti-Semitic? >> This is nuts. >> And we know from dozens of eyewitnesses and many first-person accounts that the thing called the grassy knoll, which is right there, which you all can visit in downtown Dallas, that there was activity there. They wouldn't allow people up there. People heard gunshots from there. If it wasn't for the Zapruder film, all this would just be hearsay. >> No. No. Because at his assassination, again, this is a guy named Charlie Kirk, at his assassination, dozens of people claimed that the bang actually came from much closer to the tent, that it didn't come from far away. And they said it sounded more like a firecracker than a high-powered rifle. I mean, the irony that he would even suggest this, that there's some grassy knoll. I mean, that's like a conspiracy theory. We all know this. We've heard this since childhood. The grassy knoll. It's a joke. I I got to turn I got to stop this. This is too much. It's the government, Charlie. It's the government. They don't lie to us. Why would they lie to us? They want to solve crimes. They knew it was Lee Harvey Oswald alone with a rifle from a distance shooting a high-profile political figure in broad daylight. I don't care about the 15 or 20 weird things. 15 or 20 weird things happen every day. People tell lies. This is ridiculous. Oh, it must have been LBJ. Why? Cuz he took Because he took Kennedy's place, that's why it had to be LBJ. There were all these different things that were happening that day for the first time. Well, thing different things happen, Charlie. Different things happen. I'm assured that's the only time he said something silly like that. He would never, for example, have sat down with Tucker Carlson and said something so stupid. Not Charlie Kirk. No. No. No. Not Charlie Kirk.He would never have sat down with Tucker Carlson and and indulge in conspiracy theories. Cuz we all know Tucker Carlson is, in fact, a conspiracy theorist. What say you, Charlie Kirk? >> Talk about JFK. It's so obvious why they're keeping that declassified. Because, at the very least, the government knew it was going to happen. And at the probable, the government was involved in the assassination of JFK. >> Can you imagine if I got on a podcast and said something so absurd I'll give you I'll give you a modern parallel. If I got on this broadcast and I said it it's probable the government was aware of the death of Charlie Kirk, for example. That it was they were aware of what happened. And it was probable the government was involved in the assassination of Charlie Kirk. That is absolute lunacy. That is conspiracy-level tier stuff. That is crazy crazy stuff. The government has spoken. There was a commission. The Supreme Court Chief Justice was on it. This is absolute lunacy, Charlie. Hopefully, he's done with this foolishness. >> And therefore, now this is important, cuz therefore, it is an introductory radicalization event. And they know that. An introductory radicalization event is what all of you had during COVID, which is where you start to then go down a sequence of questions, and once you begin, there's no stopping you. >> Wait. What Wait. What? What? You You You said JFK's assassination was an introductory-level radicalization event. That that's like saying people who are concerned that the government might have been involved or the covered up the means and the and the how the who the how and the why of the death of Charlie Kirk. That would mean that could be considered an introductory radicalization event. Are you out of your mind? COVID? We know what happened with COVID. It was a bat in China. It's unfortunate. Very unfortunate. And what he's suggesting is that perhaps the government was lying to us. And that that was some sort of an introductory radicalization attempt uh event. That that that you might have lived through that and then you would have trouble believing the government the next time they come along and say a lone gunman with a high-powered rifle assassinated a high-profile political figure by himself in broad daylight. You might have trouble believing that. And that's foolishness. That's fool- That's conspiracy level stuff. That's the kind of only people that watch Candace think that. That's that's foolishness. That's ludicrous. I can't I can't believe this guy. I can't believe this guy. Oh my gosh, what is this? Is this a tweet of his? Did he write this? Oh, no. No, no, no, no, no. Not Charlie Kirk. Surely not. Char- Charlie would never write something like Oh my gosh, he did. A former CIA director said, "Thank God for the deep state." Oh, he's one of those people that believes in the deep state. Oh my gosh. Well, we know what people are who think of the deep- believe in the deep state, huh? Hello, lunatic. Char- Charles uh Chuck Schumer warned Trump not to mess with the intel community because they have six ways from Sunday to take you out. I remember that and we all know Chuck didn't really mean that. This was never some right-wing conspiracy. This was a concerted effort to destroy the president.Ladies and gentlemen, I I don't want you to take this tweet out of context, so I'm going to put it in context because it would be easy to read this tweet and believe that what Charlie Kirk is saying is sometimes the federal government the United States federal government conspires to engage in illegalities that destroy people. And you could read that tweet and you could conclude that. But but we know that's not true. We know they would never do something like that. That's that's foolishness. So, what he obviously meant was uh uh >> [sighs] >> what he obviously meant was uh Candace is demonic. That's right. That's what he meant. That's That's what we know he meant. That's what we know he meant. So, guys, knock it off, okay? Just [snorts] knock it off. This is This is gone too far. This is gone too far. Oh my gosh, is he bringing up JFK again? Are you kidding me? Can you leave it alone with the government conspiracy theories already? 60 years ago today JFK was murdered in broad daylight. That's weird. A moment that would alter the trajectory of American history and shatter the public's trust in the federal government. Well, that's That's interesting. Today, the same intel agencies whose fingerprints are all over the JFK assassination are more unaccountable and more weaponized than ever? You know, they killed JFK for saying this stuff. If you believe the conspiracy theories, you might be tempted to believe that when JFK said he was going to destroy the intelligence agencies and scatter them to the winds that they would have killed him over something like And and and here's Charlie Kirk saying something similar. So, I know some of you will leap to that conclusion that oh my gosh, maybe the government did have something to do with Charlie Kirk's Please, by all means, ladies and gentlemen, let's not get carried away. Let's hear the rest of what he has to say. Maybe he clears it up. But now they have vast technological powers from universal surveillance to the new tool of AI. Huh? You're saying the intelligence community that you were just talking bad about has vast technological powers, meaning they might have weapons we don't know about? The ability to spy on you and know your true thoughts, read your text messages and emails, and know whether or not you're a danger to their power or their entrenched power in their deep state? What? No, no, no. Oh gosh. What What's next? Surely you're going to clear this up. Because right now what he's doing is he's taking on the military-industrial complex. And we know that some people jump to conclusions, but I'm sure he'll clear that up here. When you take on the military-industrial complex and the police state, okay, finally, get Talk to reason. Settle us down here, Charlie. Don't be surprised when those in power call call for for you to be eliminated. Well, I think I read that wrong, guys. I apologize. Let me let me restate that. I The way I read it sounded really dark. So, let me let me try that again. When you take on the military-industrial complex and the police state, don't be surprised when those in power call for you to be eliminated. Huh? Well, surely you're not going to turn around and take on these powers, then, right? Because that might lead that might lead them to want to eliminate you. This last sentence should clear this up. Surely he'll step away from that.11/22/63 should be a day that reminds us that power must be returned to We the People, the sovereign, and America's intel agents agencies must be brought to heel. That that almost reads like he's going after the very intel agencies he just said could eliminate you if you challenge them. That's weird. That is weird. I never knew this about this guy. I never knew that about this guy. This is this is wild stuff. This is really wild stuff. Cuz cuz you could read all this together. I mean, you could look at the pod the the appearance he gave and with Tucker you could read the statement he gave and read it together with the statement he gave at the university there where he was talking to that young college student, and then you put it with the tweets, and you I mean, you could come to the conclusion that Charlie Kirk believed the government might take him out if he challenged them. That's dark. >> [music]