IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE

EFTA00722577 Dataset 9 6 pages Download original PDF Download as text
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, N AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 Plaintiff, Case No. 50 2009CA040800)OOO(MB AG v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and M., individually, Defendants. / EPSTEIN'S FIRST REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO EDWARDS Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, pursuant to Ha. R. Civ. P. 1.370, requests that Defendant, BRADELY J. EDWARDS ("Edwards" and/or "You" and/or "Your") admit or deny the following: 1. Admit that You caused to be filed a Complaint (DE #1) on behalf of M. in the case styled M. v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 09-CV-81092 in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, Miami Division on July 24, 2009. A copy of the Complaint is attached as Exhibit A. 2. Admit that a Complaint (DE #1) was filed on behalf of M. in the case styled MI. v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 09-CV-81092 in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, Miami Division, under your name, Florida Bar number and e-mail address while you were employed by Rothstein, Rosenfeldt Sr Adler ("RRA"). 3. Admit that the Complaint (DE #1) in Case No. 09-CV-81092 is two hundred thirty-four (234) pages, contains six hundred forty-four (644) paragraphs and one hundred fifty-six (156) counts. EFTA00722577 Epstein v. Rothstein, et al. Case No. 50 2009CA040800)OCOMB AG Epstein's First Request for Admissions to Edwards Page 2 of 6 4. Admit that in Your March 23, 2010 deposition you testified under oath (at page 226) that you had no other professional e-mail addresses while at RRA except 5. Admit that a Motion to Keep True Name Sealed in Envelope (DE #2) was filed in Case No. 09-CV-81092 under Your name, Florida Bar number and email address. 6. Admit that a Motion to Proceed Anonymously (DE #3) was filed on behalf of LM in Case No. 09-CV-81092 under Your name, Florida Bar number and e-mail address. 7. Admit that the Motion to Proceed Anonymously (DE #3) asserted that LM "was an identified victim by the FBI and U.S. Attorney's office in a criminal investigation against the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein." 8. Admit that the assertion in Request No. 13 is false. 9. Admit that in Your March 23, 2010 deposition You testified under oath (at page 12), there are only three cases in existence against Jeffrey Epstein in which You represent a plaintiff (Jane Doe, and M.). 10. Admit that the testimony described in Request No. 16 is false. 11. Admit that in Your March 23, 2010 deposition you testified under oath You only filed three cases against Jeffrey Epstein. 12. Admit that the testimony described in Request No. 18 is false. 13. Admit that in paragraph 8 of Your answer to the Complaint in this action, You asserted that "RRA never filed a lawsuit on behalf of M." 14. Admit that the assertion described in Request No. 20 is false. 15. Admit that in paragraph 8 of Your answer to the Complaint in this action, EFTA00722578 Epstein v. Rothstein, et al. Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXIAB AG Epstein's First Request for Admissions to Edwards Page 3 of 6 You asserted that lawsuits filed on behalf of M. and other victims "were filed by EDWARDS prior to any association with or knowledge of RRA." 16. Admit that the assertion described in Request No. 22 is false. 17. Admit that in paragraph 17 of your answer to the Complaint in this action, You admitted that " [r]elevant to this action, EPSTEIN is currently named as a defendant in three civil actions alleging, inter alia, sexual assault and battery that were handled by RRA and its attorneys including EDWARDS prior to its implosion - one of which is filed in federal court (Jane Doe v. Epstein, Case No. 08-CIV-80893, =I. Fla.)(Jane Doe is a named Defendant herein), and two of which have been filed in state court in the 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, State of Florida, a. v. Epstein, Case No. 502008CA028051XXXXMB AB; v. Epstein, Case No. 502008CA028058)OOCXMB AB), (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Civil Actions," and IM is a named Defendant herein). The Civil Actions were all filed in August and September of 2008." 18. Admit that in Your answer to the Complaint in this action, you never referenced the Complaint (DE #1) in Case No. 09-CV-81092. 19. Admit that in Your March 23, 2010 deposition, You never disclosed the existence of the Complaint (DE #1) in Case No. 09-CV-81092. 20. Admit that in Your March 23, 2010 deposition, You never mentioned a fourth case, Case No. 09-CV-81092, in responding to numerous questions which referenced that You only had three pending cases against Epstein. kg 3/23/10 Deposition of Brad Edwards at 12, 26, 59-60, 71, 80, 83-84,124, 301-03. 21. Admit that Scott Rothstein was involved in the decision to file the Complaint EFTA00722579 Epstein v. Rothstein, et al. Case No. 50 2009CA040800)0000a AG Epstein's First Request for Admissions to Edwards Page 4 of 6 (DE #1) in Case No. 09-CV-81092. 22. Admit that Russell Adler was involved in the decision to file the Complaint (DE #1) in Case No. 09-CV-81092. 23. Admit that Ken Jenne was involved in the decision to file the Complaint (DE #1) in Case No. 09-CV-81092. 24. Admit that Michael Fisten was involved in the decision to file the Complaint (DE #1) in Case No. 09-CV-81092. 25. Admit that in paragraph 9 of the Complaint (DE #1) in Case No. 09-CV-81092 it is alleged that Epstein "coerc[ed] or forc[ed] the then-minor M. to perform oral sex on him." 26. Admit that in her September 24, 2009 deposition LM testified under oath (at page 71), that she never had oral sex with Epstein. 27. Admit that the allegations described in Request No. 34 are false. 28. Admit that in paragraph 12 of the Complaint (DE #1) in Case No. 09-CV- 81092 it is alleged that Epstein "knowingly transported M. and other minors in interstate commerce with the intent that the [sic] M. engage in prostitution..." 29. Admit that in her February 9, 2010 deposition LM testified under oath (at page 611) she never traveled with Epstein. 30. Admit that in paragraph 18 of the Complaint (DE #1) in Case No. 09-CV- 81092, is incorrectly identified as Jane Doe 101. 31. Admit that had previously filed an action against Epstein on September 11, 2008 styled M. v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 502008CA028051XXXXMB in the Fifteenth EFTA00722580 Epstein v. Rothstein, et al. Case No. 50 2009CAO40800XXXXMB AG Epstein's First Request for Admissions to Edwards Page 5 of 6 Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida. 32. Admit that the lawsuit described in Request No. 46 was pending in July 2009 when the Complaint (DE #1) in Case No. 09-CV-81092 was filed. 33. Admit that the lawsuit described in Request No. 46 is still currently pending and seeks damages based on theories other than exclusive remedies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §2255. 34. Admit that the individual who signed the Complaint (DE #1) in Case No. 09- CV-81092 is currently a partner at the law firm of Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, PL. 35. Admit that the individual who signed the Complaint (DE #1) in Case No. 09- CV-81092 is currently an employee at the law firm of Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos Sr Lehrman, PL. Certificate of Service I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was sent by fax and U.S. Mail to the following addressees on this day of Tune , 2010: Gary M. Farmer, Jr., Esq. Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos Sr Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 954-524-2822 - fax Attorneys for Defendant,.. Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart Si Shipley, P.A Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 Fax: 561-835-8691 Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein MARC S. NURIK, ESQ. Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One East Broward Boulevard EFTA00722581 Epstein v. Rothstein, et al. Case No. 50 2009CAO40800XXXXMB AG Epstein's First Request for Admissions to Edwards Page 6 of 6 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 FL 33301 Suite 700 383-9424F Attorneys for Defendant Bradley Edwards Attorneys for Defendant Scott Rothstein FOWLER WHITE BURNETT, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein Espirito Santo Plaza 1395 Brickell Avenue, 14th Floor *3131 305.789.9201 fax By: Lilly A. Sanchez, Esq. Florida Bar No. 195677 EFTA00722582

📷 Images in this document (6 detected)

AI-generated factual descriptions of embedded images (llava:13b). These are searchable across the corpus.

[Image 1] The image shows a document with text, which appears to be a form or a letter. The text is in English and includes various statements and questions that the reader is required to answer. The document is structured with numbered sections, and there are blanks where personal information should be filled in. The text is organized into paragraphs, and there are checkboxes next to some of the statements [Image 2] The image shows a document with text, which appears to be a legal or official letter. The document is titled "NOTICE OF ACTION" and includes a case number and a date. It mentions a defendant and a plaintiff, and there are references to legal codes and court cases. The text is partially obscured with redacted sections, indicating that some information is being withheld. The document is a formal not [Image 3] The image shows a document that appears to be a legal or official notice. It contains text and a signature at the bottom. The document is titled "NOTICE OF DEFAULT AND INTENTION TO FORECLOSE" and is addressed to a named individual or entity. The text mentions a case number and a specific property address. The document is dated and signed by an individual whose name is redacted. The visible text in [Image 4] The image shows a document with text, which appears to be a letter or a report. The document is titled "REPORT OF INVESTIGATION" and includes sections such as "RECIPIENT," "DATE," "REPORT NO.," and "Prepared by." There is a date at the top of the document, which is redacted, and a recipient's name is listed, which is also redacted. The body of the document contains a description of an investigatio [Image 5] The image shows a document with text, which appears to be a court filing or legal document. The text is redacted, with certain sections blacked out, indicating that the document contains sensitive information. The visible text includes case numbers, dates, and references to legal proceedings. The document is structured with numbered paragraphs, which are typical in legal documents to organize info [Image 6] The image shows a document that appears to be a court order or a legal notice. It is a scanned document with text and a header that includes the name of the court and the case number. The visible text includes a title that reads "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA," followed by the name of the court and the case number. There is a section titled "ORDER" with a subsection titled "Defendan